机动车驾驶员特定神经病理学的早期检测 (NeuroDrive)
早期检测机动车驾驶员中的特定神经病理学
研究概览
详细说明
本研究将分两个阶段进行。 首先,一组健康参与者将使用维也纳测试系统(VTS)接受评估。 随后,将招募一个由确诊为多发性硬化症(MS)或帕金森病(PD)患者组成的临床队列。 每位临床参与者将完成基本的神经系统检查,包括蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、25英尺步行测试(25-FWT)、符号数字模式测试(SDMT)和九孔钉板测试(9-HPT)。 然后他们将接受VTS测试。
帕金森病患者将根据Hoehn和Yahr量表进行分类,而多发性硬化症患者将使用扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)进行分期。 目的是确定哪些易于获取的临床测试与VTS结果显示出最强的相关性,从而识别出可纳入驾驶员标准医学评估的可靠标志物。
在第二阶段,将使用在本研究范围之外获得的临床旁发现来加强证据基础。 最终,该项目旨在以实用计算器的形式提出一个风险方程,供医生在评估患者驾驶适宜性时使用。 另一个预期成果是开发针对性的认知和运动训练干预措施,以帮助患有神经病理学的驾驶员保持或提高安全驾驶能力。
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Ladislav Stanke, Ph.D.
- 电话号码:+420 588 443 713
- 邮箱:Ladislav.Stanke@fnol.cz
研究联系人备份
- 姓名:Dalibor Zimek, M.D.
- 电话号码:+420 702 048 036
- 邮箱:Dalibor.Zimek@fnol.cz
学习地点
-
-
Olomouc Region
-
Olomouc、Olomouc Region、捷克语、779 00
- 招聘中
- University Hospital Olomouc
-
接触:
- Ladislav Stanke, Ph.D.
- 电话号码:+420 588 443 713
- 邮箱:Ladislav.Stanke@fnol.cz
-
接触:
- Dalibor Zimek, M.D.
- 电话号码:+420 702 048 036
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
纳入标准:
- 签署知情同意书后的个人。
- 符合特定神经系统诊断的有效诊断标准后。
- 持有有效驾驶执照并证明有积极驾驶行为。
- 年龄限制为18至85岁。
排除标准:
- 根据当前心理检查(MMSE评分24分或以下)确诊为痴呆。
- 根据捷克法律第277/2004号条例(关于驾驶机动车的医疗适宜性,经修订,尤其是第204/2025号条例)诊断出疾病或状况,该疾病或状况会阻止或显著限制安全驾驶机动车的能力(例如痴呆、癫痫、严重意识障碍)。
- 年龄小于18岁。
- 年龄大于85岁。
- 在第二组(多发性硬化症患者)中,在纳入研究前的最后6周内,经证实并治疗过的复发。
- 在多发性硬化症组中,当前EDSS评分>6.5分。
- 对于帕金森病组,当前Hoehn和Yahr量表评分大于或等于4。
- 对于两组,实验室检查显示存在感染性恶化证据。
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
|---|
|
Parkinson disease cohort
PD patients cohort will consist of 100 patients with parkinson disease aged between 18-85 years, with, with a balanced sex distribution to ensure representativeness and reduce gender bias.
The target sample size (N = 100) has been chosen to provide adequate statistical power to detect moderate to strong correlations between clinical and paraclinical measures, it is intended to acquire a regular distribution across all age groups .
Participants with premorbid cognitive impairment or those not clinically stable during the study period will be excluded, also participants with a Hoehn and Yahr stage greater than 4 will be excluded.
|
|
Multiple sclerosis cohort
Multiple sclerosis patient cohort will consist of 100 patients with multiple sclerosis.
aged between 18-85 years, with, with a balanced sex distribution to ensure representativeness and reduce gender bias.
The target sample size (N = 100) has been chosen to provide adequate statistical power to detect moderate to strong correlations between clinical and paraclinical measures, it is intended to acquire a regular distribution across all age groups.
Participants with premorbid cognitive impairment or those not clinically stable during the study period will be excluded also an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score above 6.5 will serve as an exclusion criterion.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Determination Test (DT)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Determination Test (DT). A computerized test of attention, stress tolerance, and psychomotor reactivity under complex conditions. Participants are presented with rapidly changing visual and auditory stimuli (e.g., colored lights, acoustic signals) and must respond as quickly as possible using multiple response keys or pedals. Scoring: outcomes include mean and median reaction time (ms), number of correct responses, omission errors (missed stimuli), commission errors (incorrect responses), and measures of performance stability across the task. Faster, more accurate, and stable performance indicates better attentional control and stress tolerance. Administration: conducted in a quiet environment with standardized VTS hardware and software. Trained staff provide uniform instructions and monitor performance. |
Day 1
|
|
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Reaction Test (RT)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Reaction Test (RT). A computerized assessment of simple and choice reaction time measuring perceptual speed and motor response. Participants are presented with visual and/or auditory stimuli and instructed to respond as quickly as possible by pressing a button (simple RT) or selecting the correct response among multiple options (choice RT). Scoring: main outcomes include mean reaction time (ms), number of correct responses, and error rates. Faster and more accurate responses indicate better psychomotor speed and attention. Separate scores are calculated for simple and choice conditions. Administration: conducted individually in a quiet, distraction-free environment using standardized VTS hardware and software. Trained staff provide standardized instructions and supervise. |
Day 1
|
|
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Response inhibition (INHIB)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Response Inhibition (INHIB). A computerized go/no-go paradigm measuring impulse control and inhibitory executive function. Participants are presented with a continuous sequence of visual stimuli on screen. They are instructed to respond via button press to "go" stimuli and withhold responses to "no-go" stimuli. Scoring: main outcomes include reaction time to go-stimuli, number of correct responses (hits), commission errors (responses to no-go stimuli), and omission errors (missed go-stimuli). Higher accuracy with fewer commission errors reflects better inhibitory control. Administration: conducted individually in a distraction-free environment using standardized VTS software and response panel. Trained staff provide instructions and supervise performance. |
Day 1
|
|
Vienna Test Systems (VTS) - Vigilance/Sustained attention (WAFV) - Short version
大体时间:Day 1
|
Vienna Test System (VTS) - Vigilance/Sustained Attention (WAFV). A computerized test measuring sustained attention and vigilance. Participants monitor a continuous sequence of simple visual stimuli (e.g., small changes in geometric figures) presented at regular intervals. They are instructed to respond via button press whenever a predefined critical stimulus appears. Scoring: main outcomes include number of correct detections (hits), omissions (missed targets), false alarms (incorrect responses), and reaction times. Higher hits and faster, stable reaction times indicate better vigilance; higher omissions or false alarms indicate poorer sustained attention. Administration: conducted individually in a distraction-free environment using the standardized VTS software and response panel. Trained staff provide instructions and supervise. |
Day 1
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A clinician-administered screening tool for mild cognitive impairment covering multiple domains: attention, concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The test consists of 30 items with a maximum total score of 30; higher scores = better cognition. A score of 26 or above is considered normal. If the participant has ≤12 years of formal education, +1 point is added. Administration: conducted face-to-face in a quiet environment by trained staff using validated language versions; completion requires ~10-15 minutes. Outcomes: total score and change from baseline. |
Day 1
|
|
25-Foot Walk Test (25-FWT)
大体时间:Day 1
|
25-Foot Walk Test (25-FWT). A quantitative measure of ambulatory function and walking speed. Participants are instructed to walk 25 feet (7.62 m) as quickly and safely as possible. Two trials are performed, typically with a short rest interval, and the average time (in seconds) is recorded using a stopwatch. Lower times = better mobility. Use of customary assistive devices (e.g., cane, walker) is permitted and documented. Administration: conducted in a straight, unobstructed corridor with clearly marked start and finish lines. Trained staff provide standardized instructions and supervise for safety. Completion typically requires ~5 minutes. Outcomes: average time to walk 25 feet (7.62 meters), ability to complete the test, and change from baseline. |
Day 1
|
|
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). A brief neurocognitive test of attention, processing speed, and visual scanning. Participants are shown a key pairing nine symbols with digits 1-9. Using this key, they write or orally state the digit corresponding to each symbol in a randomized sequence presented on the test form. Scoring: the number of correct substitutions completed in 90 seconds is counted. Higher scores = better cognitive performance. Errors are recorded but not included in the raw score. Written and oral versions are available; the same mode is used across visits for consistency. Administration: conducted in a quiet environment with standardized instructions, requiring ~5 minutes. Staff monitor to ensure task adherence. Outcomes: total correct substitutions and standard deviation change from the normal value. |
Day 1
|
|
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT). A standardized test of finger dexterity and fine motor function. Participants are instructed to place nine pegs into nine holes on a board, one at a time, as quickly as possible, and then remove them. Each hand is tested separately, typically with the dominant hand first, followed by the non-dominant hand. Scoring: performance time (in seconds) for each hand is recorded with a stopwatch. Lower times = better dexterity. Two consecutive trials per hand are averaged. If a peg is dropped, the participant retrieves it and continues. Administration: administered in a quiet environment by trained staff using standardized instructions. Completion time is usually 3-5 minutes for both hands. Outcomes: mean completion time for each hand and change from baseline. |
Day 1
|
|
Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT)
大体时间:Day 1
|
A neuropsychological assessment of visual memory, perception, and visuoconstructive ability. Participants are shown a series of 10 geometric designs, each displayed for 10 seconds, and then asked to reproduce the design from memory using paper and pencil (Administration A). Alternate forms may be used to minimize practice effects. Scoring: each reproduction is scored for number correct (maximum = 10) and for errors (e.g., omissions, distortions, rotations, perseverations, misplacements). Higher correct scores indicate better performance, while higher error counts indicate impairment. Administration: conducted individually in a quiet setting by trained staff; typical completion ~15 minutes. Outcomes: total correct responses, total errors, and change from baseline. |
Day 1
|
|
The Big Five Inventory-2 Short Form (BFI-2-S)
大体时间:Day 1
|
Big Five Inventory-2 Short Form (BFI-2-S). A 30-item self-report assessing five personality domains: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Negative Emotionality, and Open-Mindedness. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree strongly to 5 = agree strongly). For each domain, compute the mean of its 6 items after applying the manual's reverse-keying rules; higher scores = more of that trait. No total score is used. Administration: validated language version via paper or secure ePRO; typical completion ~5-7 min. Staff provide standardized instructions and check completeness. Outcomes: domain scores (1-5) and change from baseline. Timing: baseline and follow-ups within ±3 days of the visit window. |
Day 1
|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
大体时间:Day 1
|
An 8-item self-report of daytime sleepiness. Participants rate their chance of dozing in common situations from 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance). Total score = sum of items (range 0-24; higher = worse sleepiness). Severity bands: 0-5 normal, 6-10 higher-than-normal, 11-12 mild, 13-15 moderate, 16-24 severe. Administration: validated language version via paper or secure ePRO; typical completion ~2-3 min. Staff provide standardized instructions and check completeness before scoring. Outcomes: total score; change from baseline; response = ≥3-point reduction from baseline; remission = score ≤10. |
Day 1
|
|
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
大体时间:Day 1
|
A 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks, including today.
Each item is rated 0-3; total score ranges 0-63, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
Severity categories: 0-13 minimal, 14-19 mild, 20-28 moderate, 29-63 severe.
The BDI-II is administered in validated language versions on paper or secure ePRO, requiring ~5-10 minutes.
Staff provide standardized instructions and check completeness.
Outcomes include total score, change from baseline, response (≥50% reduction from baseline), and remission (score ≤13).
|
Day 1
|
|
Driving experience self-evaluation questionnaire
大体时间:Day 1
|
This self-report questionnaire captures recent driving exposure and perceived difficulties over the past month.
Items use 7-point Likert scales anchored "Never (1)" to "Every drive (7)".
Content includes deliberate avoidance of challenging conditions (night driving, heavy traffic, bad weather, highways, unfamiliar routes), fatigue while driving, uncertainty in traffic situations (e.g., speed limits, lane selection, right of way), perceived complexity/overload, inattention, vehicle-control errors (e.g., wrong gear, pedal mix-ups), oversight errors (e.g., missed lights/signs, failure to check mirrors), warnings from other road users, risk-taking, traffic-rule violations, and emotional arousal during driving.
A brief exposure module records typical driving frequency, lifetime kilometers, and the frequency of driving in specific conditions.
Higher scores indicate more frequent difficulties; the primary metric is the mean item score (1-7).
|
Day 1
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- OP JAK ITI VZ 1
- CZ.02.01.01/00/23_021/0008829 (其他赠款/资助编号:Operational Programme Jan Ámos Komenský financed by the European Union (EU) and the State Budget of Czech Republic)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.