Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Versus High-Fidelity Simulation for Emergency Management Training in Medical Interns
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Virtual Reality-Based Simulation With High-fidelity Simulation for Training Novice Physicians in Emergency Management
This study is a two-arm parallel randomized controlled non-inferiority trial designed to compare the educational effectiveness of virtual reality (VR)-based simulation with high-fidelity simulation (HFS) for emergency management training in medical interns.
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either VR-based training or HFS-based training for managing desaturation and anaphylaxis scenarios. After training and structured debriefing, all participants will undergo objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and complete pre- and post-training surveys.
The primary outcome is OSCE performance score. Secondary outcomes include confidence improvement, participant satisfaction, usability (UEQ-S).
研究概览
地位
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Seoul
-
Seoul、Seoul、韩国、03080
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria
- Medical interns enrolled in the 2026 internship program at Seoul National University Hospital
- Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Did not complete pre-training survey
- Declined participation
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：VR Group
Participants use an immersive VR platform to manage simulated patients with oxygen desaturation and anaphylaxis.
|
Participants use an immersive VR platform to manage simulated patients with oxygen desaturation and anaphylaxis.
|
|
有源比较器：HFS Group
Participants use a high-fidelity simulator (Sim-Man) to manage the same emergency scenarios.
|
Participants use a high-fidelity simulator (Sim-Man) to manage the same emergency scenarios.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
OSCE Performance Score
大体时间：Immediately after training
|
Mean total score of two Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations (desaturation and anaphylaxis).
Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better clinical performance.
|
Immediately after training
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Confidence Improvement
大体时间：Immediately before and immediately after training
|
Self-reported confidence in emergency management measured using a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
|
Immediately before and immediately after training
|
|
Participant Satisfaction
大体时间：Immediately after training
|
Participant satisfaction measured using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
|
Immediately after training
|
|
Usability (UEQ-S)
大体时间：Immediately after training
|
Usability assessed using the User Experience Questionnaire-Short Version (UEQ-S).
Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a more positive user experience.
|
Immediately after training
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Task Completion Time
大体时间：Immediately after training
|
Time required to complete VR emergency scenarios, measured in seconds.
|
Immediately after training
|
|
Critical Action Completion Rate
大体时间：Immediately after training
|
Percentage of predefined critical actions successfully completed during VR scenarios.
|
Immediately after training
|
|
Task Sequence Accuracy
大体时间：Immediately after training
|
Accuracy of procedural task sequence during VR emergency scenarios based on predefined scenario flow.
|
Immediately after training
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Sun Jung Myung、Seoul National University Hospital
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.