- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07584863
Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Versus High-Fidelity Simulation for Emergency Management Training in Medical Interns
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Virtual Reality-Based Simulation With High-fidelity Simulation for Training Novice Physicians in Emergency Management
This study is a two-arm parallel randomized controlled non-inferiority trial designed to compare the educational effectiveness of virtual reality (VR)-based simulation with high-fidelity simulation (HFS) for emergency management training in medical interns.
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either VR-based training or HFS-based training for managing desaturation and anaphylaxis scenarios. After training and structured debriefing, all participants will undergo objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and complete pre- and post-training surveys.
The primary outcome is OSCE performance score. Secondary outcomes include confidence improvement, participant satisfaction, usability (UEQ-S).
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Seoul
-
Seoul, Seoul, Corée du Sud, 03080
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria
- Medical interns enrolled in the 2026 internship program at Seoul National University Hospital
- Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Did not complete pre-training survey
- Declined participation
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Autre
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: VR Group
Participants use an immersive VR platform to manage simulated patients with oxygen desaturation and anaphylaxis.
|
Participants use an immersive VR platform to manage simulated patients with oxygen desaturation and anaphylaxis.
|
|
Comparateur actif: HFS Group
Participants use a high-fidelity simulator (Sim-Man) to manage the same emergency scenarios.
|
Participants use a high-fidelity simulator (Sim-Man) to manage the same emergency scenarios.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
OSCE Performance Score
Délai: Immediately after training
|
Mean total score of two Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations (desaturation and anaphylaxis).
Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better clinical performance.
|
Immediately after training
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Confidence Improvement
Délai: Immediately before and immediately after training
|
Self-reported confidence in emergency management measured using a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
|
Immediately before and immediately after training
|
|
Participant Satisfaction
Délai: Immediately after training
|
Participant satisfaction measured using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
|
Immediately after training
|
|
Usability (UEQ-S)
Délai: Immediately after training
|
Usability assessed using the User Experience Questionnaire-Short Version (UEQ-S).
Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a more positive user experience.
|
Immediately after training
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Task Completion Time
Délai: Immediately after training
|
Time required to complete VR emergency scenarios, measured in seconds.
|
Immediately after training
|
|
Critical Action Completion Rate
Délai: Immediately after training
|
Percentage of predefined critical actions successfully completed during VR scenarios.
|
Immediately after training
|
|
Task Sequence Accuracy
Délai: Immediately after training
|
Accuracy of procedural task sequence during VR emergency scenarios based on predefined scenario flow.
|
Immediately after training
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Sun Jung Myung, Seoul National University Hospital
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- C-2602-161-1723
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .