此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Comparison of Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage in the Management of Acute Breast Abscess (I&D VS PSD)

2026年5月10日 更新者：HARI KRISHNA GUPTA、GSVM Medical College

A Comparative Study of Management of Acute /Pyogenic Breast Abscess Using Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage

This prospective interventional study compares the effectiveness of standard incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drain placement in the management of acute pyogenic breast abscess. Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated equally into two groups. The study evaluates outcomes including postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings required, complications, and recurrence. The aim is to determine whether percutaneous suction drainage provides superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgical management.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Acute breast abscess is a common surgical condition requiring prompt intervention. Conventional incision and drainage (I&D) has been the standard treatment; however, it is associated with increased pain, prolonged healing, and frequent dressings. Minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous suction drainage (PSD) have emerged as alternatives with potential advantages.

This prospective comparative interventional study was conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, from May 2025 to Feb 2026. Eighty patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess were allocated into two groups: Group A (I&D) and Group B (PSD).

Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings, complications (residual abscess, fistula), and recurrence at 3 months. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

80

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

  • 印度
    • Uttar Pradesh
      • Kanpur、Uttar Pradesh、印度、208002
        • Gsvm Medical College

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess
  • Abscess size ≥ 3 cm on ultrasonography
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abscess size < 3 cm on ultrasonography
  • Patients unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Pre-existing skin disorders involving the breast
  • Significant comorbid conditions (e.g., coagulopathy, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, hepatitis B or C)
  • Diagnosed cases of antibioma
  • Tuberculous mastitis
  • Breast malignancy

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：治疗
  • 分配：非随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Incision and Drainage
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess
程序：Incision and Drainage
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess with evacuation of pus.
实验性的：Percutaneous Suction Drain
Minimally invasive suction drain placement for breast abscess
程序：Percutaneous Suction Drain
Minimally invasive placement of suction catheter for drainage of breast abscess.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Postoperative pain
大体时间：Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a patient-reported pain assessment scale ranging from 0 to 10, where:

0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain scores will be recorded on postoperative Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, and Day 90 after the procedure.
Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure
Number of Dressings
大体时间：Within 30 days post-procedure
Total number of postoperative dressings required per patient in number
Within 30 days post-procedure
Length of Hospitalization
大体时间：Up to 15 days post-procedure
Length of hospital stay measured in days from procedure to discharge
Up to 15 days post-procedure
Wound healing
大体时间：From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)
Time to complete wound healing, defined as the number of days from the procedure to full epithelialization of the wound with absence of discharge, assessed by clinical examination.
From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Residual Abscess
大体时间：Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of residual abscess, defined as the presence of a persistent or recurrent fluid collection at the original site confirmed by clinical examination and/or ultrasonography after the initial procedure.
Within 30 days post-procedure
FISTULA FORMATION
大体时间：Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of fistula formation, defined as the development of a persistent abnormal tract with discharge from the wound site following the procedure, confirmed by clinical examination.
Within 30 days post-procedure

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

GSVM Medical College

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

  • Hassan SSU et al. (2024). Comparative study on recurrence rates: incision and drainage versus percutaneous aspiration in breast abscess. DOI: 10.54112/bcsir.v2024i1.783
  • Prashanth C et al. (2024). Institutional comparative study: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus incision and drainage in 50 patients-success, healing, recurrence. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241308
  • Khan MH et al. (2023). Prospective comparative study: percutaneous needle aspiration versus conventional incision and drainage in 120 breast abscess patients. DOI: 10.53350/pjmhs020231712516
  • Singh SP et al. (2022). Extended cohort analysis: open incision and drainage versus ultrasound-guided minimally invasive procedures in breast abscess. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6001
  • Singh SP et al. (2022). Prospective cohort study: incision and drainage versus ultrasound-guided minimally invasive drainage-healing, complications, recurrence. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5857
  • Reddy KS et al. (2022). Clinical comparison of incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drainage: healing, hospital stay, and scar quality. DOI: 10.33545/surgery.2022.v6.i3a.913
  • Chorma A et al. (2022). Comparative three-arm investigation: conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drainage versus ultrasound-guided aspiration. DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i11.45696
  • Ali MN et al. (2020). Clinical study: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus surgical incision and drainage-outcomes and patient selection. DOI: 10.3329/taj.v33i1.49817
  • Dayal P et al. (2019). Prospective randomized controlled trial: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus conventional incision and drainage in 100 patients with breast abscess. DOI: 10.32553/ijmbs.v3i4.201
  • Kataria R et al. (2019). Randomized controlled trial: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus suction catheter drainage for breast abscess. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20193682
  • Oditya S et al. Comparative clinical study of conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction catheter drainage in puerperal breast abscess. 2016. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20162751

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年5月15日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年2月15日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年2月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年4月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月10日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月14日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月14日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月10日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • GSVMC-INT-2024-01

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

IPD 计划说明

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to institutional policy and patient confidentiality.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅