Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Comparison of Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage in the Management of Acute Breast Abscess (I&D VS PSD)

10 maj 2026 uppdaterad av: HARI KRISHNA GUPTA, GSVM Medical College

A Comparative Study of Management of Acute /Pyogenic Breast Abscess Using Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage

This prospective interventional study compares the effectiveness of standard incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drain placement in the management of acute pyogenic breast abscess. Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated equally into two groups. The study evaluates outcomes including postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings required, complications, and recurrence. The aim is to determine whether percutaneous suction drainage provides superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgical management.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Acute breast abscess is a common surgical condition requiring prompt intervention. Conventional incision and drainage (I&D) has been the standard treatment; however, it is associated with increased pain, prolonged healing, and frequent dressings. Minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous suction drainage (PSD) have emerged as alternatives with potential advantages.

This prospective comparative interventional study was conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, from May 2025 to Feb 2026. Eighty patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess were allocated into two groups: Group A (I&D) and Group B (PSD).

Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings, complications (residual abscess, fistula), and recurrence at 3 months. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

80

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

  • Indien
    • Uttar Pradesh
      • Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, Indien, 208002
        • Gsvm Medical College

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess
  • Abscess size ≥ 3 cm on ultrasonography
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abscess size < 3 cm on ultrasonography
  • Patients unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Pre-existing skin disorders involving the breast
  • Significant comorbid conditions (e.g., coagulopathy, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, hepatitis B or C)
  • Diagnosed cases of antibioma
  • Tuberculous mastitis
  • Breast malignancy

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Icke-randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: Incision and Drainage
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess
Procedur: Incision and Drainage
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess with evacuation of pus.
Experimentell: Percutaneous Suction Drain
Minimally invasive suction drain placement for breast abscess
Procedur: Percutaneous Suction Drain
Minimally invasive placement of suction catheter for drainage of breast abscess.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Postoperative pain
Tidsram: Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a patient-reported pain assessment scale ranging from 0 to 10, where:

0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain scores will be recorded on postoperative Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, and Day 90 after the procedure.
Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure
Number of Dressings
Tidsram: Within 30 days post-procedure
Total number of postoperative dressings required per patient in number
Within 30 days post-procedure
Length of Hospitalization
Tidsram: Up to 15 days post-procedure
Length of hospital stay measured in days from procedure to discharge
Up to 15 days post-procedure
Wound healing
Tidsram: From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)
Time to complete wound healing, defined as the number of days from the procedure to full epithelialization of the wound with absence of discharge, assessed by clinical examination.
From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Residual Abscess
Tidsram: Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of residual abscess, defined as the presence of a persistent or recurrent fluid collection at the original site confirmed by clinical examination and/or ultrasonography after the initial procedure.
Within 30 days post-procedure
FISTULA FORMATION
Tidsram: Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of fistula formation, defined as the development of a persistent abnormal tract with discharge from the wound site following the procedure, confirmed by clinical examination.
Within 30 days post-procedure

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

GSVM Medical College

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Allmänna publikationer

  • Hassan SSU et al. (2024). Comparative study on recurrence rates: incision and drainage versus percutaneous aspiration in breast abscess. DOI: 10.54112/bcsir.v2024i1.783
  • Prashanth C et al. (2024). Institutional comparative study: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus incision and drainage in 50 patients-success, healing, recurrence. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241308
  • Khan MH et al. (2023). Prospective comparative study: percutaneous needle aspiration versus conventional incision and drainage in 120 breast abscess patients. DOI: 10.53350/pjmhs020231712516
  • Singh SP et al. (2022). Extended cohort analysis: open incision and drainage versus ultrasound-guided minimally invasive procedures in breast abscess. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6001
  • Singh SP et al. (2022). Prospective cohort study: incision and drainage versus ultrasound-guided minimally invasive drainage-healing, complications, recurrence. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5857
  • Reddy KS et al. (2022). Clinical comparison of incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drainage: healing, hospital stay, and scar quality. DOI: 10.33545/surgery.2022.v6.i3a.913
  • Chorma A et al. (2022). Comparative three-arm investigation: conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drainage versus ultrasound-guided aspiration. DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i11.45696
  • Ali MN et al. (2020). Clinical study: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus surgical incision and drainage-outcomes and patient selection. DOI: 10.3329/taj.v33i1.49817
  • Dayal P et al. (2019). Prospective randomized controlled trial: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus conventional incision and drainage in 100 patients with breast abscess. DOI: 10.32553/ijmbs.v3i4.201
  • Kataria R et al. (2019). Randomized controlled trial: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus suction catheter drainage for breast abscess. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20193682
  • Oditya S et al. Comparative clinical study of conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction catheter drainage in puerperal breast abscess. 2016. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20162751

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

15 maj 2025

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

15 februari 2026

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

15 februari 2026

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

4 april 2026

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

10 maj 2026

Första postat (Faktisk)

14 maj 2026

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

14 maj 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

10 maj 2026

Senast verifierad

1 maj 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Nyckelord

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • GSVMC-INT-2024-01

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

IPD-planbeskrivning

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to institutional policy and patient confidentiality.

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera