Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage in the Management of Acute Breast Abscess (I&D VS PSD)

10. maj 2026 opdateret af: HARI KRISHNA GUPTA, GSVM Medical College

A Comparative Study of Management of Acute /Pyogenic Breast Abscess Using Standard Incision and Drainage Versus Percutaneous Suction Drainage

This prospective interventional study compares the effectiveness of standard incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drain placement in the management of acute pyogenic breast abscess. Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated equally into two groups. The study evaluates outcomes including postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings required, complications, and recurrence. The aim is to determine whether percutaneous suction drainage provides superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional surgical management.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Acute breast abscess is a common surgical condition requiring prompt intervention. Conventional incision and drainage (I&D) has been the standard treatment; however, it is associated with increased pain, prolonged healing, and frequent dressings. Minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous suction drainage (PSD) have emerged as alternatives with potential advantages.

This prospective comparative interventional study was conducted at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, from May 2025 to Feb 2026. Eighty patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess were allocated into two groups: Group A (I&D) and Group B (PSD).

Outcomes assessed included postoperative pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, wound healing time, number of dressings, complications (residual abscess, fistula), and recurrence at 3 months. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

80

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Indien
    • Uttar Pradesh
      • Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, Indien, 208002
        • Gsvm Medical College

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with acute pyogenic breast abscess
  • Abscess size ≥ 3 cm on ultrasonography
  • Willing to participate and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abscess size < 3 cm on ultrasonography
  • Patients unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Pre-existing skin disorders involving the breast
  • Significant comorbid conditions (e.g., coagulopathy, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, hepatitis B or C)
  • Diagnosed cases of antibioma
  • Tuberculous mastitis
  • Breast malignancy

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Incision and Drainage
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess
Procedure: Incision and Drainage
Standard surgical incision and drainage of breast abscess with evacuation of pus.
Eksperimentel: Percutaneous Suction Drain
Minimally invasive suction drain placement for breast abscess
Procedure: Percutaneous Suction Drain
Minimally invasive placement of suction catheter for drainage of breast abscess.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Postoperative pain
Tidsramme: Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a patient-reported pain assessment scale ranging from 0 to 10, where:

0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain scores will be recorded on postoperative Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, and Day 90 after the procedure.
Day 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post procedure
Number of Dressings
Tidsramme: Within 30 days post-procedure
Total number of postoperative dressings required per patient in number
Within 30 days post-procedure
Length of Hospitalization
Tidsramme: Up to 15 days post-procedure
Length of hospital stay measured in days from procedure to discharge
Up to 15 days post-procedure
Wound healing
Tidsramme: From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)
Time to complete wound healing, defined as the number of days from the procedure to full epithelialization of the wound with absence of discharge, assessed by clinical examination.
From procedure to complete wound healing (up to 30 days)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Residual Abscess
Tidsramme: Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of residual abscess, defined as the presence of a persistent or recurrent fluid collection at the original site confirmed by clinical examination and/or ultrasonography after the initial procedure.
Within 30 days post-procedure
FISTULA FORMATION
Tidsramme: Within 30 days post-procedure
Incidence of fistula formation, defined as the development of a persistent abnormal tract with discharge from the wound site following the procedure, confirmed by clinical examination.
Within 30 days post-procedure

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

GSVM Medical College

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

  • Hassan SSU et al. (2024). Comparative study on recurrence rates: incision and drainage versus percutaneous aspiration in breast abscess. DOI: 10.54112/bcsir.v2024i1.783
  • Prashanth C et al. (2024). Institutional comparative study: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus incision and drainage in 50 patients-success, healing, recurrence. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241308
  • Khan MH et al. (2023). Prospective comparative study: percutaneous needle aspiration versus conventional incision and drainage in 120 breast abscess patients. DOI: 10.53350/pjmhs020231712516
  • Singh SP et al. (2022). Extended cohort analysis: open incision and drainage versus ultrasound-guided minimally invasive procedures in breast abscess. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6001
  • Singh SP et al. (2022). Prospective cohort study: incision and drainage versus ultrasound-guided minimally invasive drainage-healing, complications, recurrence. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5857
  • Reddy KS et al. (2022). Clinical comparison of incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drainage: healing, hospital stay, and scar quality. DOI: 10.33545/surgery.2022.v6.i3a.913
  • Chorma A et al. (2022). Comparative three-arm investigation: conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction drainage versus ultrasound-guided aspiration. DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i11.45696
  • Ali MN et al. (2020). Clinical study: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus surgical incision and drainage-outcomes and patient selection. DOI: 10.3329/taj.v33i1.49817
  • Dayal P et al. (2019). Prospective randomized controlled trial: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus conventional incision and drainage in 100 patients with breast abscess. DOI: 10.32553/ijmbs.v3i4.201
  • Kataria R et al. (2019). Randomized controlled trial: ultrasound-guided needle aspiration versus suction catheter drainage for breast abscess. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20193682
  • Oditya S et al. Comparative clinical study of conventional incision and drainage versus percutaneous suction catheter drainage in puerperal breast abscess. 2016. DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20162751

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

15. maj 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

15. februar 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

15. februar 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

4. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

10. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

14. maj 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

14. maj 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

10. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • GSVMC-INT-2024-01

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to institutional policy and patient confidentiality.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Acute Breast Abscess

Kliniske forsøg med Incision and Drainage

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Burundi

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner