Impact of Concept Mapping in Case-Based Learning Among Medical Students
Impact of Concept Mapping and Its Integration Modality in Case-Based Learning on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Clinical Reasoning Development Among Third-Year Medical Students: A Prospective Randomized Study
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise.
The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.
研究概览
地位
详细说明
Case-Based Learning (CBL) is a learner-centered educational approach that promotes active learning and clinical reasoning through the discussion of authentic clinical cases. Concept maps are educational tools that help learners organize, integrate, and connect knowledge.
This prospective randomized study was conducted among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis. Eligible students who had reviewed the official preeclampsia learning module were randomly allocated to one of three educational interventions:
- Case-Based Learning without concept mapping.
- Case-Based Learning with a concept map designed by the instructor and presented at the end of the session.
- Case-Based Learning with a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
All groups were exposed to the same clinical case, learning objectives, instructor, and teaching duration. Learning outcomes were assessed using a pre-test, an immediate post-test, a delayed post-test administered two weeks later, and a synthesis exercise evaluating knowledge organization and clinical reasoning.
The primary outcome is the effect of concept mapping and its integration modality on clinical reasoning and knowledge organization, assessed through the synthesis exercise score. Secondary outcomes include knowledge acquisition and knowledge retention assessed through test scores and score variations over time.
The findings of this study may contribute to identifying effective educational strategies for improving learning and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Tunis、突尼斯
- Maternity and neonatology center of Tunis
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Third-year medical students enrolled in the Obstetrics and Gynecology rotation.
- Completion of the preeclampsia learning module before the educational session.
- Provision of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate.
- Failure to complete the pre-test, post-test, synthesis assessment, or delayed -post-test.
- Absence from the educational session.
- Incomplete study data.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:其他
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:CBL Without Concept Mapping
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
|
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
|
|
实验性的:CBL With Teacher-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map prepared and presented by the instructor.
|
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map designed and presented by the instructor.
|
|
实验性的:CBL With Student Co-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
|
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Reasoning Score
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
|
Assessment of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning using the Narrative Question Score (NQS).
The score ranges from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better clinical reasoning and knowledge organization.
|
Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Acquisition Score
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the learning session
|
Assessment of knowledge acquisition using the difference between post-test and pre-test scores.
Test scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge acquisition.
|
Immediately after completion of the learning session
|
|
Knowledge Retention Score
大体时间:Two weeks after completion of the learning session
|
Assessment of knowledge retention using the delayed post-test score obtained two weeks after the learning session.
Scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.
|
Two weeks after completion of the learning session
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Torre DM, Durning SJ, Daley BJ. Twelve tips for teaching with concept maps in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):201-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759644.
- Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, Purkis J, Clay D. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421-44. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.
- Novak JD, Cañas AJ. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools. 2008.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.