此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Impact of Concept Mapping in Case-Based Learning Among Medical Students

2026年6月11日 更新者:Ben marzouk Sofiene、University Tunis El Manar

Impact of Concept Mapping and Its Integration Modality in Case-Based Learning on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Clinical Reasoning Development Among Third-Year Medical Students: A Prospective Randomized Study

This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation.

Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise.

The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.

研究概览

详细说明

Case-Based Learning (CBL) is a learner-centered educational approach that promotes active learning and clinical reasoning through the discussion of authentic clinical cases. Concept maps are educational tools that help learners organize, integrate, and connect knowledge.

This prospective randomized study was conducted among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis. Eligible students who had reviewed the official preeclampsia learning module were randomly allocated to one of three educational interventions:

  1. Case-Based Learning without concept mapping.
  2. Case-Based Learning with a concept map designed by the instructor and presented at the end of the session.
  3. Case-Based Learning with a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.

All groups were exposed to the same clinical case, learning objectives, instructor, and teaching duration. Learning outcomes were assessed using a pre-test, an immediate post-test, a delayed post-test administered two weeks later, and a synthesis exercise evaluating knowledge organization and clinical reasoning.

The primary outcome is the effect of concept mapping and its integration modality on clinical reasoning and knowledge organization, assessed through the synthesis exercise score. Secondary outcomes include knowledge acquisition and knowledge retention assessed through test scores and score variations over time.

The findings of this study may contribute to identifying effective educational strategies for improving learning and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

26

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Tunis、突尼斯
        • Maternity and neonatology center of Tunis

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Third-year medical students enrolled in the Obstetrics and Gynecology rotation.
  • Completion of the preeclampsia learning module before the educational session.
  • Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate.
  • Failure to complete the pre-test, post-test, synthesis assessment, or delayed -post-test.
  • Absence from the educational session.
  • Incomplete study data.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:CBL Without Concept Mapping
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
实验性的:CBL With Teacher-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map prepared and presented by the instructor.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map designed and presented by the instructor.
实验性的:CBL With Student Co-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Clinical Reasoning Score
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
Assessment of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning using the Narrative Question Score (NQS). The score ranges from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better clinical reasoning and knowledge organization.
Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Knowledge Acquisition Score
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the learning session
Assessment of knowledge acquisition using the difference between post-test and pre-test scores. Test scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge acquisition.
Immediately after completion of the learning session
Knowledge Retention Score
大体时间:Two weeks after completion of the learning session
Assessment of knowledge retention using the delayed post-test score obtained two weeks after the learning session. Scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.
Two weeks after completion of the learning session

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年2月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年3月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年3月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月7日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月7日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月11日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月15日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月11日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅