- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT07643116
Impact of Concept Mapping in Case-Based Learning Among Medical Students
Impact of Concept Mapping and Its Integration Modality in Case-Based Learning on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Clinical Reasoning Development Among Third-Year Medical Students: A Prospective Randomized Study
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise.
The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Detaljert beskrivelse
Case-Based Learning (CBL) is a learner-centered educational approach that promotes active learning and clinical reasoning through the discussion of authentic clinical cases. Concept maps are educational tools that help learners organize, integrate, and connect knowledge.
This prospective randomized study was conducted among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis. Eligible students who had reviewed the official preeclampsia learning module were randomly allocated to one of three educational interventions:
- Case-Based Learning without concept mapping.
- Case-Based Learning with a concept map designed by the instructor and presented at the end of the session.
- Case-Based Learning with a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
All groups were exposed to the same clinical case, learning objectives, instructor, and teaching duration. Learning outcomes were assessed using a pre-test, an immediate post-test, a delayed post-test administered two weeks later, and a synthesis exercise evaluating knowledge organization and clinical reasoning.
The primary outcome is the effect of concept mapping and its integration modality on clinical reasoning and knowledge organization, assessed through the synthesis exercise score. Secondary outcomes include knowledge acquisition and knowledge retention assessed through test scores and score variations over time.
The findings of this study may contribute to identifying effective educational strategies for improving learning and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education.
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Tunis, Tunisia
- Maternity and neonatology center of Tunis
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Third-year medical students enrolled in the Obstetrics and Gynecology rotation.
- Completion of the preeclampsia learning module before the educational session.
- Provision of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate.
- Failure to complete the pre-test, post-test, synthesis assessment, or delayed -post-test.
- Absence from the educational session.
- Incomplete study data.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Annen
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: CBL Without Concept Mapping
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
|
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
|
|
Eksperimentell: CBL With Teacher-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map prepared and presented by the instructor.
|
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map designed and presented by the instructor.
|
|
Eksperimentell: CBL With Student Co-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
|
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Reasoning Score
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
|
Assessment of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning using the Narrative Question Score (NQS).
The score ranges from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better clinical reasoning and knowledge organization.
|
Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Acquisition Score
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the learning session
|
Assessment of knowledge acquisition using the difference between post-test and pre-test scores.
Test scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge acquisition.
|
Immediately after completion of the learning session
|
|
Knowledge Retention Score
Tidsramme: Two weeks after completion of the learning session
|
Assessment of knowledge retention using the delayed post-test score obtained two weeks after the learning session.
Scores range from 0 to 20 points, with higher scores indicating better knowledge retention.
|
Two weeks after completion of the learning session
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Generelle publikasjoner
- Torre DM, Durning SJ, Daley BJ. Twelve tips for teaching with concept maps in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):201-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759644.
- Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, Purkis J, Clay D. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421-44. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.
- Novak JD, Cañas AJ. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools. 2008.
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- CBL/2026
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .