Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Impact of Concept Mapping in Case-Based Learning Among Medical Students

7 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Ben marzouk Sofiene, University Tunis El Manar

Impact of Concept Mapping and Its Integration Modality in Case-Based Learning on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Clinical Reasoning Development Among Third-Year Medical Students: A Prospective Randomized Study

This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation.

Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise.

The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Case-Based Learning (CBL) is a learner-centered educational approach that promotes active learning and clinical reasoning through the discussion of authentic clinical cases. Concept maps are educational tools that help learners organize, integrate, and connect knowledge.

This prospective randomized study was conducted among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis. Eligible students who had reviewed the official preeclampsia learning module were randomly allocated to one of three educational interventions:

  1. Case-Based Learning without concept mapping.
  2. Case-Based Learning with a concept map designed by the instructor and presented at the end of the session.
  3. Case-Based Learning with a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.

All groups were exposed to the same clinical case, learning objectives, instructor, and teaching duration. Learning outcomes were assessed using a pre-test, an immediate post-test, a delayed post-test administered two weeks later, and a synthesis exercise evaluating knowledge organization and clinical reasoning.

The primary outcome is the effect of concept mapping and its integration modality on clinical reasoning and knowledge organization, assessed through the synthesis exercise score. Secondary outcomes include knowledge acquisition and knowledge retention assessed through test scores and score variations over time.

The findings of this study may contribute to identifying effective educational strategies for improving learning and clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical education.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

26

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Tunis, Túnez
        • Maternity and Neonatology Center of Tunis

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Third-year medical students enrolled in the Obstetrics and Gynecology rotation.
  • Completion of the preeclampsia learning module before the educational session.
  • Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate.
  • Failure to complete the pre-test, post-test, synthesis assessment, or delayed -post-test.
  • Absence from the educational session.
  • Incomplete study data.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: CBL Without Concept Mapping
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session without the use of concept mapping.
Experimental: CBL With Teacher-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map prepared and presented by the instructor.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map designed and presented by the instructor.
Experimental: CBL With Student Co-Constructed Concept Map
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.
Participants receive a Case-Based Learning session supplemented by a concept map progressively developed by students under instructor supervision.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Clinical Reasoning Score
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session
Assessment of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning development using the synthesis question score (NQS)
Immediately after completion of the Case-Based Learning session

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Knowledge Acquisition Score
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately after completion of the learning session
Difference between immediate post-test and pre-test scores (Δ1 = N2 - N1).
Immediately after completion of the learning session
Knowledge Retention Score
Periodo de tiempo: Two weeks after completion of the learning session
Delayed post-test score and score variation between delayed and immediate post-tests (Δ2 = N3 - N2).
Two weeks after completion of the learning session

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Actual)

31 de marzo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de marzo de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

7 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

7 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

11 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

7 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Educación médica

Suscribir