此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Functional and Aesthetic Comparison of Surgical Nasal Reconstruction Versus Nasal Prosthesis (Epithesis) After Total or Subtotal Nasal Amputation (CERNAS)

2026年6月29日 更新者:Hôpital NOVO

Comparison of Epithesis and Surgical Nasal Reconstruction Using the SCHNOS Score

CERNAS is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study comparing the functional and aesthetic outcomes of two rehabilitation strategies after total or subtotal nasal amputation: surgical reconstruction (primarily paramedian forehead flap or free flap) versus nasal epithesis (prosthesis). Patients who have undergone either rehabilitation at least one year prior to enrolment will be invited to complete the validated French version of the SCHNOS (Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey) questionnaire. The study aims to provide an objective, patient-reported comparison of these two options to guide future clinical decision-making.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

详细说明

Total or subtotal nasal amputation - defined as loss of at least three nasal subunits, or two subunits including the dorsum - results in major aesthetic and functional consequences with a significant impact on quality of life and social reintegration. Currently, two main rehabilitation approaches exist: surgical reconstruction (paramedian forehead flap as the gold standard, or free flaps such as the radial forearm free flap for larger defects) and nasal epithesis (implant-retained or adhesive prosthesis).

The choice between these techniques is often guided by the surgeon's experience and patient preference, in the absence of clear consensus, as very few studies have directly compared both options using standardised, patient-reported outcome measures.

The primary objective of this study is to compare functional and aesthetic outcomes between surgical reconstruction and epithesis groups using the SCHNOS questionnaire validated in French. Secondary objectives include comparison of subgroups by complications, comorbidities, patient profile, and identification of patients who switched rehabilitation modality.

Eligible patients will be identified via medical records by investigators at each participating centre. Those meeting inclusion criteria will be contacted by phone and then sent the information letter and questionnaire by mail or email. They may complete the questionnaire in paper form or via the secure Microsoft Forms platform. Questionnaire data will be exported to a centralised, password-protected Excel database for statistical analysis.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

20

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

      • Caen、法国、14033
        • CHU de Caen
        • 首席研究员:
          • Maxime HUMBERT, Doctor
      • Paris、法国、75010
        • Hôpital Lariboisière
        • 接触:
        • 首席研究员:
          • Benjamin VERILLAUD, Professor
      • Paris、法国、75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris St Joseph
        • 首席研究员:
          • Vincent BEDARIDA, Doctor
      • Pontoise、法国
        • Hopital Novo
        • 接触:
        • 首席研究员:
          • Laureline DESABRES, Doctor

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Patient who has undergone surgical or prosthetic nasal reconstruction following a total or subtotal nasal amputation.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients who have undergone total or subtotal nasal amputation (defined as loss of at least three nasal subunits, or of two subunits including the dorsum) and who have been rehabilitated either by surgical reconstruction or by nasal epithesis for more than one year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing tumour progression or tumour recurrence
  • Non-French-speaking patients
  • Patients under legal protection measures (guardianship, legal safeguarding, limited or full legal incapacity)
  • Patients unlikely to cooperate with the study (e.g. presenting with a psychiatric disorder)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Surgical Reconstruction
Patient who has had nasal reconstruction
Total score on the validated French version of the SCHNOS (Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey) questionnaire, comparing surgical reconstruction versus epithesis groups after total or subtotal nasal amputation.
Nasal Epithesis
Patient who has had a nasal prosthesis
Total score on the validated French version of the SCHNOS (Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey) questionnaire, comparing surgical reconstruction versus epithesis groups after total or subtotal nasal amputation.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
SCHNOS total score
大体时间:Single assessment at inclusion (at least 1 year after nasal reconstruction or epithesis placement)
Total score on the validated French version of the SCHNOS (Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey) questionnaire, comparing surgical reconstruction versus epithesis groups after total or subtotal nasal amputation.
Single assessment at inclusion (at least 1 year after nasal reconstruction or epithesis placement)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Subgroup comparison by complications and comorbidities
大体时间:Single assessment at inclusion
Comparison of SCHNOS scores between subgroups defined by complications, comorbidities, and patient profile (age, sex, aetiology of amputation, treatment history).
Single assessment at inclusion
Description of Clinical Profiles
大体时间:Single assessment at inclusion
Subgroup analysis of the profiles of patients who opted to change their rehabilitation treatment
Single assessment at inclusion
Benefit-risk balance of each rehabilitation technique
大体时间:Single assessment at inclusion
Comparative analysis of each technique based on implementation modalities, time to rehabilitation, complications, and reversibility.
Single assessment at inclusion

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Laureline DESABRES, Doctor、Hopital Novo
  • 首席研究员:Benjamin VERILLAUD, Pr、Hôpital Lariboisière
  • 首席研究员:Vincent BEDARIDA, Doctor、Groupe Hospitalier Paris St Joseph
  • 首席研究员:Maxime HUMBERT, Doctor、University Hospital, Caen

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年7月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年1月2日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年1月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月23日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月23日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月29日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月29日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅