The Impact of Symptom Management Nursing Intervention on the QoL of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: Mediation of Self-management Efficacy and Regulation of Psychological Resilience
2026年6月25日 更新者:Jie Zeng
Dahua Hospital, Xuhui District, Shanghai
Symptom management nursing intervention can improve the self-management efficacy, psychological resilience, and QoL of patients with advanced lung cancer.
研究概览
地位
完全的
详细说明
Self management efficacy is an important mediating variable in the impact of Symptom management nursing intervention on patients' quality of life.
Psychological resilience plays a negative moderating role in the effect of Symptom management nursing intervention.
Late stage lung cancer patients with low psychological resilience can obtain more significant self management efficacy and quality of life improvement from Symptom management nursing intervention, and are the key beneficiaries of the intervention.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
176
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200031
- Dahua Hospital, Xuhui District, Shanghai
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
不
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- According to the diagnostic criteria of primary lung cancer [9], the clinical stage was stage ⅢB-Ⅳ
- aged 18-75 years old
- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥60 and expected survival ≥3 months
- Patients had clear consciousness and normal cognitive function, and could complete the questionnaire independently or with the assistance of the researcher
- have basic communication skills and can cooperate to complete the whole intervention
- Patients or their families informed and signed the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- primary malignant tumors in other parts
- history of severe heart, liver, kidney and other important organ failure, severe infection or mental illness
- Unable to cooperate with the study due to cognitive impairment, visual and hearing impairment
- participating in other similar nursing intervention studies.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:其他
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
其他:Routine nursing group
Patients in the routine group were given routine care, including disease monitoring, medication care, diet and nutrition guidance, basic life care, routine health education on admission and discharge, symptomatic treatment of patients' discomfort symptoms, telephone follow-up twice a week to understand the patient's condition, and no systematic and personalized SM nursing intervention.
|
Patients in the routine group were given routine care, including disease monitoring, medication care, diet and nutrition guidance, basic life care, routine health education on admission and discharge, symptomatic treatment of patients' discomfort symptoms, telephone follow-up twice a week to understand the patient's condition, and no systematic and personalized SM nursing intervention.
|
|
其他:standardized systematic SM nursing group
On the basis of routine nursing, implementation of systematic SM nursing intervention for 8 weeks, the specific content is as follows: (1) The intervention group was established.
(2) Baseline assessment and file establishment (within 24 hours of admission).(3)
Implementation of core intervention (1st to 8th week).
|
On the basis of routine nursing, implementation of systematic SM nursing intervention for 8 weeks, the specific content is as follows: (1) The intervention group was established.
(2) Baseline assessment and file establishment (within 24 hours of admission).(3)
Implementation of core intervention (1st to 8th week).
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Scale
大体时间:Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale will be used to assess changes in quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.
The scale consists of 36 items across five domains: physical health status, social and family conditions, emotional well-being, functional capability, and lung cancer-specific supplementary concerns.
Each item is scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 144.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
The scale has demonstrated good reliability and validity in Chinese populations (Cronbach's α = 0.88-0.92).
|
Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-Management Efficacy as measured by the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (SUPPH) Scale
大体时间:Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
|
The SUPPH scale will be used to assess changes in disease self-management efficacy.
The scale includes 28 items across three dimensions: Positive Attitude, Self-Applied Stress Reduction, and Independent Decision-Making.
Each item is scored on a 1-5 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 28 to 140.
Higher scores indicate greater self-management efficacy.
The Chinese version has excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.96 for the total scale).
|
Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
|
|
Change in Psychological Resilience as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
大体时间:Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
|
The CD-RISC will be used to assess changes in psychological resilience.
The scale measures three dimensions-Tenacity, Self-Improvement, and Optimism-using 25 items.
Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate stronger psychological resilience.
The Chinese version has demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.91).
|
Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mediating Effect of Self-Management Efficacy on the Relationship between Symptom Management Intervention and Quality of Life
大体时间:Assessed at 8 weeks (post-intervention) using post-intervention scores
|
This outcome will examine whether self-management efficacy (SUPPH score) mediates the relationship between the symptom management nursing intervention (group assignment) and quality of life (FACT-L score).
The mediating effect will be analyzed using the PROCESS macro with bootstrap resampling (5,000 iterations).
Indirect effect, direct effect, and total effect will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals.
An effect is considered significant if the 95% CI does not include zero.
|
Assessed at 8 weeks (post-intervention) using post-intervention scores
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
赞助
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2023年6月10日
初级完成 (实际的)
2024年10月27日
研究完成 (实际的)
2025年12月12日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年6月25日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年6月25日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年7月1日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年7月1日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年6月25日
最后验证
2026年6月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 20230509
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.