Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

The Impact of Symptom Management Nursing Intervention on the QoL of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: Mediation of Self-management Efficacy and Regulation of Psychological Resilience

25 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Jie Zeng

Dahua Hospital, Xuhui District, Shanghai

Symptom management nursing intervention can improve the self-management efficacy, psychological resilience, and QoL of patients with advanced lung cancer.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Self management efficacy is an important mediating variable in the impact of Symptom management nursing intervention on patients' quality of life. Psychological resilience plays a negative moderating role in the effect of Symptom management nursing intervention. Late stage lung cancer patients with low psychological resilience can obtain more significant self management efficacy and quality of life improvement from Symptom management nursing intervention, and are the key beneficiaries of the intervention.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

176

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Cina, 200031
        • Dahua Hospital, Xuhui District, Shanghai

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • According to the diagnostic criteria of primary lung cancer [9], the clinical stage was stage ⅢB-Ⅳ
  • aged 18-75 years old
  • Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥60 and expected survival ≥3 months
  • Patients had clear consciousness and normal cognitive function, and could complete the questionnaire independently or with the assistance of the researcher
  • have basic communication skills and can cooperate to complete the whole intervention
  • Patients or their families informed and signed the consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • primary malignant tumors in other parts
  • history of severe heart, liver, kidney and other important organ failure, severe infection or mental illness
  • Unable to cooperate with the study due to cognitive impairment, visual and hearing impairment
  • participating in other similar nursing intervention studies.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: Routine nursing group
Patients in the routine group were given routine care, including disease monitoring, medication care, diet and nutrition guidance, basic life care, routine health education on admission and discharge, symptomatic treatment of patients' discomfort symptoms, telephone follow-up twice a week to understand the patient's condition, and no systematic and personalized SM nursing intervention.
Patients in the routine group were given routine care, including disease monitoring, medication care, diet and nutrition guidance, basic life care, routine health education on admission and discharge, symptomatic treatment of patients' discomfort symptoms, telephone follow-up twice a week to understand the patient's condition, and no systematic and personalized SM nursing intervention.
Altro: standardized systematic SM nursing group
On the basis of routine nursing, implementation of systematic SM nursing intervention for 8 weeks, the specific content is as follows: (1) The intervention group was established. (2) Baseline assessment and file establishment (within 24 hours of admission).(3) Implementation of core intervention (1st to 8th week).
On the basis of routine nursing, implementation of systematic SM nursing intervention for 8 weeks, the specific content is as follows: (1) The intervention group was established. (2) Baseline assessment and file establishment (within 24 hours of admission).(3) Implementation of core intervention (1st to 8th week).

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Quality of Life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Scale
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale will be used to assess changes in quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. The scale consists of 36 items across five domains: physical health status, social and family conditions, emotional well-being, functional capability, and lung cancer-specific supplementary concerns. Each item is scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 144. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The scale has demonstrated good reliability and validity in Chinese populations (Cronbach's α = 0.88-0.92).
Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Self-Management Efficacy as measured by the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (SUPPH) Scale
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
The SUPPH scale will be used to assess changes in disease self-management efficacy. The scale includes 28 items across three dimensions: Positive Attitude, Self-Applied Stress Reduction, and Independent Decision-Making. Each item is scored on a 1-5 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 28 to 140. Higher scores indicate greater self-management efficacy. The Chinese version has excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.96 for the total scale).
Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
Change in Psychological Resilience as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)
The CD-RISC will be used to assess changes in psychological resilience. The scale measures three dimensions-Tenacity, Self-Improvement, and Optimism-using 25 items. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate stronger psychological resilience. The Chinese version has demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.91).
Baseline (within 24 hours of admission) and at 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention)

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Mediating Effect of Self-Management Efficacy on the Relationship between Symptom Management Intervention and Quality of Life
Lasso di tempo: Assessed at 8 weeks (post-intervention) using post-intervention scores
This outcome will examine whether self-management efficacy (SUPPH score) mediates the relationship between the symptom management nursing intervention (group assignment) and quality of life (FACT-L score). The mediating effect will be analyzed using the PROCESS macro with bootstrap resampling (5,000 iterations). Indirect effect, direct effect, and total effect will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. An effect is considered significant if the 95% CI does not include zero.
Assessed at 8 weeks (post-intervention) using post-intervention scores

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

10 giugno 2023

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

27 ottobre 2024

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

12 dicembre 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

25 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

25 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

1 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

1 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

25 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 20230509

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su routine nursing group

3
Sottoscrivi