此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

DRF Reposition Manual Reduction vs Finger-trap Traction (RepoDRF2)

2026年7月6日 更新者:Medical University Innsbruck

Unterschied Der Reposition in Bruchspaltanästhesie Zur Reposition im Aushang Bei Einer Distalen Radiusfraktur - Eine Prospektiv Randomisierte Studie

Participants with distal radius fractures treated conservatively with cast immobilization are assigned to one of two approaches: (1) closed reduction under local anesthesia (hematoma block) followed by traction and casting, or (2) traction and casting without formal reduction. While reduction aims to restore anatomical alignment, loss of reduction may occur during follow-up. The study evaluates whether reduction under local anesthesia provides any benefit over traction alone. The hypothesis is that both treatments result in comparable radiographic alignment and functional outcomes at the end of treatment.

研究概览

详细说明

Participants have sustained a distal radius fracture treated with cast immobilization. Two common conservative management approaches are being compared: (1) closed reduction under a local anesthetic (hematoma block) followed by traction and casting, and (2) immobilization after traction alone without formal reduction under anesthesia.

While the first method aims to restore anatomical alignment initially, loss of reduction may occur over time. The second method improves alignment but does not attempt full anatomical reduction.

The study hypothesis is that both approaches result in similar wrist alignment and functional outcomes after completion of treatment. The objective of this study is to determine whether reduction under local anesthesia followed by traction provides any advantage over traction alone in patients with distal radius fractures.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

64

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Tyrol
      • Innsbruck、Tyrol、奥地利、6020
        • Univ.-Klinik für Orthopädie und Traumatologie

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Dorsally tilted distal radius fracture (DRF) > 10° (intra-articular or extra-articular) Dorsal comminution of the distal radius fracture

Fracture classification (AO), dorsally displaced:

  • A2
  • A3
  • C1
  • C2
  • C3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Non-displaced fractures of the radius
  • Previous palmar displaced fractures of the radius
  • Displacement greater than one shaft width
  • Open fractures of the radius
  • Bilateral radius fractures
  • History of a previous radius fracture
  • Inability to provide informed consent due to physical or mental disability
  • Unavailability for follow-up examinations (e.g., abroad, polytrauma)
  • Lack of full legal capacity
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Median nerve irritation
  • Pregnancy

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:基础科学
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:R: Manual Reduction
Hematoma block 5 mL 2% lidocaine, followed by 15 minutes finger-trap traction and then manual reduction + cast application
实验性的:A: Finger-trap traction
15 minutes finger-trap traction only and then cast application

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Pain difference between the groups
大体时间:From enrollment (Baseline) to the 12month Follow Up.
Comparison of the pain score in the course of the follow ups between the groups. 0= no pain 10 = worst pain (maximal pain)
From enrollment (Baseline) to the 12month Follow Up.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
MHQ Hand Score (Patient reported outcome)
大体时间:Enrollment until 12 month follow up
Difference in functional outcome measured with MHQ (Michigan Hand Outcome Questionaire) between the two groups. 0 points= very poor hand function / maximum impairment; 100 points → optimal hand function, no impairment.
Enrollment until 12 month follow up
PRWE - Patient reported outcome
大体时间:Enrollment until 12month follow up
Difference in functional outcome measured with PRWE (Patient-rated wrist evaluation) between the two groups. 0 points= optimal hand function, no impairment; 100 points → very poor hand function / maximum impairment.
Enrollment until 12month follow up
Grip strength
大体时间:12 weeks until 12mo Follow up
Difference in grip strength measured with dynanometer between the two groups. Grip strength is compared to the contralateral non-injured wrist.
12 weeks until 12mo Follow up
Range of motion - functional outcome
大体时间:12 weeks until 12 mo follow-up
Difference in functional outcome (range of motion) measured with goniometer after treatment between the two groups. Range of Motion is compared to the contraltaeral non-injured wrist.
12 weeks until 12 mo follow-up
Radiological outcome
大体时间:Enrollment until 12 month Follow up
Difference in radiological outcome between the two groups; especially, dorsal tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance.
Enrollment until 12 month Follow up
Complications
大体时间:After treatment until 12 month Follow up
Complications between the two groups.
After treatment until 12 month Follow up

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2018年2月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2022年7月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2022年7月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月6日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月13日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月6日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • RepoDRF2
  • AOTrauma Research Austria 2020 (其他赠款/资助编号:AO Trauma)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅