Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

DRF Reposition Manual Reduction vs Finger-trap Traction (RepoDRF2)

6. juli 2026 opdateret af: Medical University Innsbruck

Unterschied Der Reposition in Bruchspaltanästhesie Zur Reposition im Aushang Bei Einer Distalen Radiusfraktur - Eine Prospektiv Randomisierte Studie

Participants with distal radius fractures treated conservatively with cast immobilization are assigned to one of two approaches: (1) closed reduction under local anesthesia (hematoma block) followed by traction and casting, or (2) traction and casting without formal reduction. While reduction aims to restore anatomical alignment, loss of reduction may occur during follow-up. The study evaluates whether reduction under local anesthesia provides any benefit over traction alone. The hypothesis is that both treatments result in comparable radiographic alignment and functional outcomes at the end of treatment.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Participants have sustained a distal radius fracture treated with cast immobilization. Two common conservative management approaches are being compared: (1) closed reduction under a local anesthetic (hematoma block) followed by traction and casting, and (2) immobilization after traction alone without formal reduction under anesthesia.

While the first method aims to restore anatomical alignment initially, loss of reduction may occur over time. The second method improves alignment but does not attempt full anatomical reduction.

The study hypothesis is that both approaches result in similar wrist alignment and functional outcomes after completion of treatment. The objective of this study is to determine whether reduction under local anesthesia followed by traction provides any advantage over traction alone in patients with distal radius fractures.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

64

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Tyrol
      • Innsbruck, Tyrol, Østrig, 6020
        • Univ.-Klinik für Orthopädie und Traumatologie

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

Dorsally tilted distal radius fracture (DRF) > 10° (intra-articular or extra-articular) Dorsal comminution of the distal radius fracture

Fracture classification (AO), dorsally displaced:

  • A2
  • A3
  • C1
  • C2
  • C3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Non-displaced fractures of the radius
  • Previous palmar displaced fractures of the radius
  • Displacement greater than one shaft width
  • Open fractures of the radius
  • Bilateral radius fractures
  • History of a previous radius fracture
  • Inability to provide informed consent due to physical or mental disability
  • Unavailability for follow-up examinations (e.g., abroad, polytrauma)
  • Lack of full legal capacity
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Median nerve irritation
  • Pregnancy

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Grundvidenskab
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: R: Manual Reduction
Hematoma block 5 mL 2% lidocaine, followed by 15 minutes finger-trap traction and then manual reduction + cast application
Eksperimentel: A: Finger-trap traction
15 minutes finger-trap traction only and then cast application

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain difference between the groups
Tidsramme: From enrollment (Baseline) to the 12month Follow Up.
Comparison of the pain score in the course of the follow ups between the groups. 0= no pain 10 = worst pain (maximal pain)
From enrollment (Baseline) to the 12month Follow Up.

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
MHQ Hand Score (Patient reported outcome)
Tidsramme: Enrollment until 12 month follow up
Difference in functional outcome measured with MHQ (Michigan Hand Outcome Questionaire) between the two groups. 0 points= very poor hand function / maximum impairment; 100 points → optimal hand function, no impairment.
Enrollment until 12 month follow up
PRWE - Patient reported outcome
Tidsramme: Enrollment until 12month follow up
Difference in functional outcome measured with PRWE (Patient-rated wrist evaluation) between the two groups. 0 points= optimal hand function, no impairment; 100 points → very poor hand function / maximum impairment.
Enrollment until 12month follow up
Grip strength
Tidsramme: 12 weeks until 12mo Follow up
Difference in grip strength measured with dynanometer between the two groups. Grip strength is compared to the contralateral non-injured wrist.
12 weeks until 12mo Follow up
Range of motion - functional outcome
Tidsramme: 12 weeks until 12 mo follow-up
Difference in functional outcome (range of motion) measured with goniometer after treatment between the two groups. Range of Motion is compared to the contraltaeral non-injured wrist.
12 weeks until 12 mo follow-up
Radiological outcome
Tidsramme: Enrollment until 12 month Follow up
Difference in radiological outcome between the two groups; especially, dorsal tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance.
Enrollment until 12 month Follow up
Complications
Tidsramme: After treatment until 12 month Follow up
Complications between the two groups.
After treatment until 12 month Follow up

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. februar 2018

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

31. juli 2022

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

31. juli 2022

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

22. juni 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

6. juli 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

13. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

13. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

6. juli 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • RepoDRF2
  • AOTrauma Research Austria 2020 (Andet bevillings-/finansieringsnummer: AO Trauma)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Distale radiusfrakturer

Kliniske forsøg med Manual reduction

3
Abonner