Concomitant proton pump inhibitor use does not reduce the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir: A pooled analysis of 1,322 patients with hepatitis C infection

Nancy Reau, Michael N Robertson, Hwa-Ping Feng, Luzelena Caro, Wendy W Yeh, Bach-Yen T Nguyen, Janice Wahl, Eliav Barr, Peggy Hwang, Stephanie O Klopfer, Nancy Reau, Michael N Robertson, Hwa-Ping Feng, Luzelena Caro, Wendy W Yeh, Bach-Yen T Nguyen, Janice Wahl, Eliav Barr, Peggy Hwang, Stephanie O Klopfer

Abstract

Concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use reduces plasma concentrations of certain nonstructural protein 5A inhibitors, which are key components of modern hepatitis C infection (HCV) treatments. These reduced concentrations may decrease efficacy, leading to challenging treatment failures due to the development of resistance-associated substitutions. This post-hoc analysis assessed 12-week sustained viral response (SVR12) and pharmacokinetics of fixed-dose combination elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in patients with HCV infection and self-reported PPI use. Data were derived from six phase 3 EBR/GZR trials with treatment-naive or treatment-experienced genotype 1- or 4-infected patients, with or without compensated cirrhosis. Baseline PPI use was defined as ≥7 consecutive days of use between study days -7 and 7. Bivariate analyses assessed PPI use and factors associated with SVR12 with sex, age (continuous and dichotomous), cirrhosis status, prior treatment status, baseline HCV RNA (continuous and dichotomous), HCV genotype, and baseline resistance-associated substitutions as variables in the models. Overall, 12% (162/1,322) of EBR/GZR-treated patients reported baseline PPI use. Of those, 96% achieved SVR12. In patients without PPI use, 97% achieved SVR12. PPI use was not a predictive factor in achieving SVR12 based on a univariate analysis (P = 0.188). In the bivariate models, none of the interaction terms involving PPI use were statistically significant. There was no significant effect of PPI usage, regardless of adjustment for considered factors. The estimated area under the curve and maximum concentration values for EBR were comparable among patients with and without reported PPI use. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that PPI use with EBR/GZR had no clinically significant effect on SVR12 rates in genotype 1/4-infected patients with or without compensated cirrhosis. (clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02092350, NCT02105467, NCT02105662, NCT02105688, NCT02105701, NCT02358044) (Hepatology Communications 2017;1:757-764).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot of bivariate regression models. Abbreviation: RAS, resistance‐associated substitution.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Population PK modeling showing the estimated AUC0‐24 and Cmax values for EBR. (A) Distribution of EBR AUC by SVR12 status and PPI use with at least 7 consecutive days of PPI use within days –7 to 7. (B) Distribution of EBR Cmax by SVR12 status and PPI use with at least 7 consecutive days of PPI use within days –7 to 7.

References

    1. Rane PP, Guha S, Chatterjee S, Aparasu RR. Prevalence and predictors of non‐evidence based proton pump inhibitor use among elderly nursing home residents in the US. Res Social Adm Pharm 2017;13:358‐363.
    1. Mazer‐Amirshahi M, Mullins PM, van den Anker J, Meltzer A, Pines JM. Rising rates of proton pump inhibitor prescribing in US emergency departments. Am J Emerg Med 2014;32:618‐622.
    1. Othman F, Card TR, Crooks CJ. Proton pump inhibitor prescribing patterns in the UK: a primary care database study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016;25:1079‐1087.
    1. Lauffenburger JC, Mayer CL, Hawke RL, Brouwer KL, Fried MW, Farley JF. Medication use and medical comorbidity in patients with chronic hepatitis C from a US commercial claims database: high utilization of drugs with interaction potential. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:1073‐1082.
    1. Shin JM, Sachs G. Pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2008;10:528‐534.
    1. Ogawa R, Echizen H. Drug‐drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010;49:509‐533.
    1. De Clercq E. Current race in the development of DAAs (direct‐acting antivirals) against HCV. Biochem Pharmacol 2014;89:441‐452.
    1. EPCLUSA (sofosbuvir and velpatasvir) prescribing information. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences, Inc; 2016:1‐34.
    1. HARVONI (ledipasvir and sofosbuvir) prescribing information. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences, Inc; 2016:1‐41.
    1. Blechman MB, Gelb AM. Aging and gastrointestinal physiology. Clin Geriatr Med 1999;15:429‐438.
    1. Buti M, Esteban R. Management of direct antiviral agent failures. Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22:432‐438.
    1. Summa V, Ludmerer SW, McCauley JA, Fandozzi C, Burlein C, Claudio G, et al. MK‐5172, a selective inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS3/4a protease with broad activity across genotypes and resistant variants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:4161‐4167.
    1. Coburn CA, Meinke PT, Chang W, Fandozzi CM, Graham DJ, Hu B, et al. Discovery of MK‐8742: an HCV NS5A inhibitor with broad genotype activity. Chem Med Chem 2013;8:1930‐1940.
    1. Harper S, McCauley JA, Rudd MT, Ferrara M, DiFilippo M, Crescenzi B, et al. Discovery of MK‐5172, a macrocyclic hepatitis C virus NS3/4a protease inhibitor. ACS Med Chem Lett 2012;3:332‐336.
    1. Zeuzem S, Ghalib R, Reddy KR, Pockros PJ, Ben Ari Z, Zhao Y, et al. Grazoprevir‐elbasvir combination therapy for treatment‐naive cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 4, or 6 infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:1‐13.
    1. Buti M, Gordon SC, Zuckerman E, Lawitz E, Calleja JL, Hofer H, et al. Grazoprevir, elbasvir, and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection after failure of pegylated interferon and ribavirin with an earlier‐generation protease inhibitor: final 24‐week results from C‐SALVAGE. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:32‐36.
    1. Forns X, Gordon SC, Zuckerman E, Lawitz E, Calleja JL, Hofer H, et al. Grazoprevir and elbasvir plus ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype‐1 infection after failure of combination therapy containing a direct‐acting antiviral agent. J Hepatol 2015;63:564‐572.
    1. Kwo PG, Peng E, Pearlman CY, Vierling B, Serfaty J, Buti Ferret L, et al. Patients with HCV G1 G4 or G6 infection who previously failed peginterferon/RBV: C‐EDGE treatment‐experienced trial. In: European Association for the Study of the Liver; April 22‐26, 2015; Vienna, Austria.
    1. Roth D, Nelson DR, Bruchfeld A, Liapakis A, Silva M, Monsour H Jr, et al. Grazoprevir plus elbasvir in treatment‐naive and treatment‐experienced patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and stage 4‐5 chronic kidney disease (the C‐SURFER study): a combination phase 3 study. Lancet 2015;386:1537‐1545.
    1. Rockstroh JK, Nelson M, Katlama C, Lalezari J, Mallolas J, Bloch M, et al. Efficacy and safety of grazoprevir (MK‐5172) and elbasvir (MK‐8742) in patients with hepatitis C virus and HIV co‐infection (C‐EDGE CO‐INFECTION): a non‐randomised, open‐label trial. Lancet HIV 2015;2:e319‐e327.
    1. Dore GJ, Altice F, Litwin AH, Dalgard O, Gane EJ, Shibolet O, et al.; C‐EDGE CO‐STAR Study Group . Elbasvir‐grazoprevir to treat hepatitis C virus infection in persons receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625‐634.
    1. Feng HP, Vaddady P, Guo Z, Liu F, Panebianco D, Levine V, et al. No pharmacokinetic interaction between HCV inhibitors elbasvir/grazoprevir and famotidine or pantoprazole. Clin Transl Sci 2017; doi: . [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Sperl J, Horvath G, Halota W, Ruiz‐Tapiador JA, Streinu‐Cercel A, Jancoriene L, et al. Efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir and sofosbuvir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin: a phase III randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol 2016;65:1112‐1119.
    1. Shiffman ML, Rustgi V, Bennett M, Forns X, Asselah T, Planas Vila R, et al. Safety and efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir with or without ribavirin in HCV‐infected patients taking concomitant acid‐reducing agents. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:845‐851.
    1. Terrault N, Zeuaem S, Di Bisceglie AM, Lim JK, Pockros PJ, Frazier LM, et al.; HCV‐TARGET Study Group . Treatment outcomes with 8, 12, and 24 week regimens of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of hepatitis C infection: analysis of a multicenter prospective, observational study. Presented at: 66th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; November 13‐17, 2015; San Francisco, CA.
    1. Mascolini M. Effect of food and acid reducing agents on the relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir fixed dose combination tablet. In: 15th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV and Hepatitis Therapy; May 19‐20, 2014; Washington, DC.
    1. VIEKIRA PAK (ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir tablets; dasabuvir tablets) prescribing information. North Chicago, IL: Abbvie; 03‐B366; 2016:1‐50.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅