Efficacy and Safety of Combination Grazoprevir (MK-5172)/Elbasvir (MK-8742) Versus Sofosbuvir + Pegylated Interferon + Ribavirin in Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1, 4 or 6 Infection (MK-5172-077)

September 3, 2018 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Phase III, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Regimen of MK-5172/MK-8742 Versus Sofosbuvir/Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (PR) in Treatment-Naïve and PR Prior Treatment Failure Subjects With Chronic HCV GT1, 4 or 6 Infection

This is a study comparing grazoprevir (MK-5172) plus elbasvir (MK-8742) treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) plus Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin (RBV) [PR] treatment in treatment-naïve and prior PR treatment failure participants with chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype (GT)1, GT4, or GT6 infection. The primary objectives are to compare efficacy (assessed by the percentage of participants achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks after ending study treatment [SVR12]) and safety between the grazoprevir plus elbasvir treatment arm and the SOF plus PR treatment arm. The primary hypothesis is that the percentage of participants achieving SVR12 in the grazoprevir plus elbasvir treatment arm is non-inferior to that in the SOF plus PR treatment arm.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

257

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Weigh ≥40 kg and ≤125 kg
  • documented chronic HCV GT1, GT4, or GT6 infection
  • cirrhosis/absence of cirrhosis defined by liver biopsy, Fibroscan, or FibroSure®
  • either treatment naïve or PR Null Responder, PR Partial Responder, or PR Prior Relapser
  • participant and partner both agree to use at least use at least 2 effective methods of contraception from at least 2 weeks prior to Day 1 and continue until up to 6 months after last dose of study drug, or longer if dictated by local regulations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • has evidence of decompensated liver disease
  • is coinfected with hepatitis B virus (e.g. hepatitis B surface antigen positive) or human immunodeficiency virus
  • history of malignancy ≤5 years prior to signing informed consent, or is under evaluation for other active or suspected malignancy
  • has cirrhosis and liver imaging within 6 months of Day 1 showing evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or is under evaluation for HCC
  • has any of the following conditions: immunologically-mediated disease, organ transplants other than cornea and hair, poor venous access that precludes routine peripheral blood sampling, history of gastric surgery or malabsorption disorders, or any medical condition requiring, or likely to require, chronic systemic administration of corticosteroids during the course of the trial, history of chronic hepatitis not caused by HCV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Grazoprevir + Elbasvir
Participants receive a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of 100 mg grazoprevir and 50 mg elbasvir for 12 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.
Drug: Sofosbuvir
400 mg tablets, taken orally (PO) every day (QD) for 12 weeks.
Biological: PegIntron
PegIntron administered subcutaneously every week (QW) at 1.5 mcg/kg for 12 weeks.
Drug: Ribavirin
Capsule and/or tablet administered PO twice daily (BID) based on weight (1000 - 1200 mg) for 12 weeks.
Active Comparator: SOF + PR
Participants receive SOF (400 mg) combined with PegIntron (1.5 mcg/kg) plus RBV (1000-1200 mg weight-based dose) for 12 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of follow-up.
Drug: Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (100 mg/50 mg) FDC
Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (100 mg/50 mg) FDC, taken PO QD for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary: Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After the End of All Treatment (SVR12)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 24)
Hepatitis C Virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 on blood samples drawn from each participant. SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) at 12 weeks after the end of all study therapy. The primary efficacy hypothesis for this study was that the percentage of participants achieving SVR12 in the grazoprevir plus elbasvir arm was non-inferior to the percentage in the SOF plus PR arm. A secondary statistical analysis was performed to determine whether the percentage of participants achieving SVR12 in the grazoprevir plus elbasvir arm was superior to the percentage in the SOF plus PR arm.
12 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 24)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Period Plus First 14 Follow-up Days
Time Frame: Treatment + First 14 days of follow-up (Up to Week 14)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported for each treatment arm.
Treatment + First 14 days of follow-up (Up to Week 14)
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE
Time Frame: Up to Week 12

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, was also an AE.

The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was reported for each treatment arm. Participants that discontinued study drug treatment due to an AE may have still continued on trial.
Up to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Tier 1 Safety Event (Key Safety Parameter) During the Treatment Period and First 14 Follow-up Days
Time Frame: Treatment + First 14 days of follow-up (Up to Week 14)
Tier 1 safety events were pre-specified by the protocol to evaluate safety and test the safety superiority hypothesis. Tier 1 safety events were chosen to assess broad tolerability, hematological side effects and liver-related laboratory abnormalities. For this study, Tier 1 safety events included: any serious drug-related AE, any drug-related AE leading to permanent discontinuation (DC) of all study drugs, neutrophil count <0.75 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, severe depression, hepatic events of clinical interest (defined by abnormal increases in alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], or alkaline phosphatase [ALP]), or events meeting stopping rule criteria for DC from trial (due to abnormal increases of ALT, AST, or ALP with/without pre-specified related AEs). The percentage of participants who experienced each individual event that was defined as a Tier 1 safety event during the study treatment period was reported for each treatment arm.
Treatment + First 14 days of follow-up (Up to Week 14)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Ending Study Treatment (SVR24)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 36)
HCV-RNA levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 on blood samples drawn from each participant. SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA <LLOQ at 24 weeks after the end of all study therapy.
24 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 36)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response 4 Weeks After Ending Study Treatment (SVR4)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 16)
HCV-RNA levels in plasma were measured using the Roche COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 on blood samples drawn from each participant. SVR4 was defined as HCV RNA <LLOQ at 4 weeks after the end of all study therapy.
4 weeks after end of all therapy (Study Week 16)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5172-077
  • 2014-003836-38 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on Sofosbuvir

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Slovenia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe