Quantum biology in low level light therapy: death of a dogma

Andrei P Sommer, Peter Schemmer, Attila E Pavláth, Horst-Dieter Försterling, Ádám R Mester, Mario A Trelles, Andrei P Sommer, Peter Schemmer, Attila E Pavláth, Horst-Dieter Försterling, Ádám R Mester, Mario A Trelles

Abstract

Background: It is shown that despite exponential increase in the number of clinically exciting results in low level light therapy (LLLT), scientific progress in the field is retarded by a wrong fundamental model employed to explain the photon-cell interaction as well as by an inadequate terminology. This is reflected by a methodological stagnation in LLLT, persisting since 1985. The choice of the topics is, by necessity, somewhat arbitrary. Obviously, we are writing more about the fields we know more about. In some cases, there are obvious objective reasons for the choice. Progress in LLLT is currently realized by a trial and error process, as opposed to a systematic approach based on a valid photon-cell interaction model.

Methods: The strategy to overcome the current problem consists in a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical foundation of LLLT, and if necessary, by introducing new interaction models and checking their validity on the basis of the two pillars of scientific advance (I) agreement with experiment and (II) predictive capability. The list of references used in this work, does contain a representative part of what has been done in the photon-cell interaction theory in recent years, considered as ascertained by the scientific community.

Results: Despite the immense literature on the involvement of cytochrome c oxidase (COX) in LLLT, the assumption that COX is the main mitochondrial photoacceptor for R-NIR photons no longer can be counted as part of the theoretical framework proper, at least not after we have addressed the misleading points in the literature. Here, we report the discovery of a coupled system in mitochondria whose working principle corresponds to that of field-effect transistor (FET). The functional interplay of cytochrome c (emitter) and COX (drain) with a nanoscopic interfacial water layer (gate) between the two enzymes forms a biological FET in which the gate is controlled by R-NIR photons. By reducing the viscosity of the nanoscopic interfacial water layers within and around the mitochondrial rotary motor in oxidatively stressed cells R-NIR light promotes the synthesis of extra adenosine triphosphate (ATP).

Conclusions: Based on the results of our own work and a review of the published literature, we present the effect of R-NIR photons on nanoscopic interfacial water layers in mitochondria and cells as a novel understanding of the biomedical effects R-NIR light. The novel paradigm is in radical contrast to the theory that COX is the main absorber for R-NIR photons and responsible for the increase in ATP synthesis, a dogma propagated for more than 20 years.

Keywords: Low level light therapy (LLLT); adenosine triphosphate (ATP); biological field-effect transistor (FET); biostimulation; cytochrome c oxidase (COX); interfacial water; mitochondria; quantum biology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.159). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basic Arndt-Schultz curve (1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principle of the biological field-effect transistor (FET): The tunneling of electrons (not shown in the image) across the gate comprising the nanoscopic interfacial water layer formed by three monolayers of H2O (blue), confined between the enzymes cytochrome c acting as emitter (red) and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) acting as drain (green), is controlled by R-NIR photons. The expectation that exposure of the enzyme complex to biostimulatory intensities of R-NIR light induces an instant drop in the viscosity of the nanoscopic interfacial water layer confined in the space between emitter and drain, complemented by a spatial separation (volume expansion) is based on the results described in (44,49), respectively. The working principle of the FET can be understood on the basis of Eq. [1] and [2]. Image inspired by (48).

References

    1. Sommer AP, Pinheiro AL, Mester AR, et al. Biostimulatory windows in low-intensity laser activation: lasers, scanners, and NASA's light-emitting diode array system. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001;19:29-33. 10.1089/104454701750066910
    1. Mester E. The use of the laser beam in therapy. Orv Hetil 1966;107:1012-6.
    1. Mester E, Spiry T, Szende B, et al. Effect of laser rays on wound healing. Am J Surg 1971;122:532-5. 10.1016/0002-9610(71)90482-X
    1. Mester E. Über die stimulierende Wirkung der Laserstrahlung auf die Wundheilung. In: Der Laser: Grundlagen und Klinische Anwendungen. Dienstl K, Fischer PL. editors. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1981:109-18.
    1. Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A. The biomedical effect of laser application. Lasers Surg Med 1985;5:31-39. 10.1002/lsm.1900050105
    1. Sommer AP. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase is not the primary acceptor for near infrared light-it is mitochondrial bound water: the principles of low-level light therapy. Ann Transl Med 2019;7:S13. 10.21037/atm.2019.01.43
    1. Karu T. Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 1999;49:1-17. 10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00219-X
    1. Wong-Riley MT, Liang HL, Eells JT, et al. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins: role of cytochrome c oxidase. J Biol Chem 2005;280:4761-71. 10.1074/jbc.M409650200
    1. Desmet KD, Paz DA, Corry JJ, et al. Clinical and experimental applications of NIR-LED photobiomodulation. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24:121-8. 10.1089/pho.2006.24.121
    1. Whelan H, Desmet K, Buchmann E, et al. Harnessing the cell's own ability to repair and prevent neurodegenerative disease. SPIE Newsroom 2008;2008:1-3.
    1. Karu TI. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation (Low-Power Laser Therapy). IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2014;20:7000306. 10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2273411
    1. Hennessy M, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation and the brain: a new paradigm. J Opt 2017;19:013003. 10.1088/2040-8986/19/1/013003
    1. Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and Mitochondrial Redox Signaling in Photobiomodulation. Photochem Photobiol 2018;94:199-212. 10.1111/php.12864
    1. Paiva ACM, da Fonseca AS. Could adverse effects and complications of selective laser trabeculoplasty be decreased by low-power laser therapy? Int Ophthalmol 2019;39:243-57. 10.1007/s10792-017-0775-0
    1. Mason MG, Nicholls P, Cooper CE. Re-evaluation of the near infrared spectra of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase: Implications for non invasive in vivo monitoring of tissues. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014;1837:1882-91.
    1. Malatesta F, Antonini G, Sarti P, et al. Structure and function of a molecular machine: cytochrome c oxidase. Biophys Chem 1995;54:1-33. 10.1016/0301-4622(94)00117-3
    1. Cooper CE, Springett R. Measurement of cytochrome oxidase and mitochondrial energetics by near-infrared spectroscopy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1997;352:669-76. 10.1098/rstb.1997.0048
    1. Beauvoit B, Evans SM, Jenkins TW, et al. Correlation between the light scattering and the mitochondrial content of normal tissues and transplantable rodent tumors. Anal Biochem 1995;226:167-74. 10.1006/abio.1995.1205
    1. Koch HG, Schneider D. Folding, assembly, and stability of transmembrane cytochromes. Current Chem Biol 2007;1:59-74.
    1. Wang Y, Huang YY, Wang Y, et al. Red (660nm) or near-infrared (810nm) photobiomodulation stimulates, while blue (415nm), green (540nm) light inhibits proliferation in human adipose-derived stem cells. Sci Rep 2017;7:7781. 10.1038/s41598-017-07525-w
    1. Kushibiki T, Hirasawa T, Okawa S, et al. Blue laser irradiation generates intracellular reactive oxygen species in various types of cells. Photomed Laser Surg 2013;31:95-104. 10.1089/pho.2012.3361
    1. Quirk BJ, Whelan HT. Effect of red-to-near infrared light on the reaction of isolated cytochrome c oxidase with cytochrome c. Photomed Laser Surg 2016;34:631-7. 10.1089/pho.2015.4042
    1. Sommer AP. A mechanism for ultrasound/light-induced biostimulation. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:291.
    1. Rakic P. DNA synthesis and cell division in the adult primate brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1985;457:193-211. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb20806.x
    1. Gross CG. Neurogenesis in the adult brain: death of a dogma. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000;1:67-73. 10.1038/35036235
    1. Yang L, Tucker D, Dong Y, et al. Photobiomodulation therapy promotes neurogenesis by improving post-stroke local microenvironment and stimulating neuroprogenitor cells. Exp Neurol 2018;299:86-96. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.10.013
    1. Wang X, Tian F, Soni SS, et al. Interplay between up-regulation of cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemoglobin oxygenation induced by near-infrared laser. Sci Rep 2016;6:30540. 10.1038/srep30540
    1. Passarella S, Karu T. Absorption of monochromatic and narrow band radiation in the visible and near IR by both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial photoacceptors results in photobiomodulation. J Photochem Photobiol B 2014;140:344-58. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.07.021
    1. Ohshiro T. Low Level Laser Therapy: A Practical Introduction. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988:30.
    1. Oshiro T. Light and life: A review of low reactive-level laser therapy, following 13 years’ experience in over 12000 patients. Laser Ther 1993;5:5-22.
    1. Passarella S, Casamassima E, Molinari S, et al. Increase of proton electrochemical potential and ATP synthesis in rat liver mitochondria irradiated in vitro by helium-neon laser. FEBS Lett 1984;175:95-9. 10.1016/0014-5793(84)80577-3
    1. Karu T., Pyatibrat L., Kalendo G.. Irradiation with He-Ne laser increases ATP level in cells cultivated in vitro. J Photochem Photobiol B 1995;27:219-23. 10.1016/1011-1344(94)07078-3
    1. Lubart R, Eichler M, Lavi R, et al. Low-energy laser irradiation promotes cellular redox activity. Photomed Laser Surg 2005;23:3-9. 10.1089/pho.2005.23.3
    1. Lubart R, Lavi R, Friedmann H, et al. Photochemistry and photobiology of light absorption by living cells. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24:179-85. 10.1089/pho.2006.24.179
    1. Ford RC, Ruffle SV, Ramirez-Cuesta AJ, et al. Inelastic incoherent neutron scattering measurements of intact cells and tissues and detection of interfacial water. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:4682-8. 10.1021/ja0393269
    1. Cauwels A, Rogge E, Vandendriessche B, et al. Extracellular ATP drives systemic inflammation, tissue damage and mortality. Cell Death Dis 2014;5:e1102. 10.1038/cddis.2014.70
    1. Volonté C, Amadio S, Cavaliere F, et al. Extracellular ATP and neurodegeneration. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord 2003;2:403-12. 10.2174/1568007033482643
    1. Murgia M, Pizzo P, Steinberg TH, et al. Characterization of the cytotoxic effect of extracellular ATP in J774 mouse macrophages. Biochem J 1992;288:897-901. 10.1042/bj2880897
    1. Wang L, Hu L, Grygorczyk R, et al. Modulation of extracellular ATP content of mast cells and DRG neurons by irradiation: studies on underlying mechanism of low-level-laser therapy. Mediators Inflamm 2015;2015:630361.
    1. Chaudry IH. Does ATP cross the cell plasma membrane. Yale J Biol Med 1982;55:1-10.
    1. Dahl G. ATP release through pannexon channels. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2015. doi: .10.1098/rstb.2014.0191
    1. Sommer AP, Jaganathan S, Maduro MR, et al. Genesis on diamonds II: contact with diamond enhances human sperm performance by 300%. Ann Transl Med 2016;4:407. 10.21037/atm.2016.08.18
    1. Price M. Diamond dishes could boost IVF success rates. Available online:
    1. Sommer AP, Haddad MKh, Fecht HJ. Light effect on water viscosity: Implication for ATP biosynthesis. Sci Rep 2015;5:12029. 10.1038/srep12029
    1. Anders JJ, Arany PR, Baxter GD, et al. Light-Emitting Diode Therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy Are Photobiomodulation Therapy. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2019;37:63-5. 10.1089/photob.2018.4600
    1. Strubakos CD, Malik M, Wider JM, et al. Non-invasive treatment with near-infrared light: A novel mechanisms-based strategy that evokes sustained reduction in brain injury after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2020;40:833-44. 10.1177/0271678X19845149
    1. Sanderson TH, Wider JM, Lee I, et al. Inhibitory modulation of cytochrome c oxidase activity with specific near-infrared light wavelengths attenuates brain schemia/reperfusion injury. Sci Rep 2018;8:3481. 10.1038/s41598-018-21869-x
    1. Shimada S, Shinzawa-Itoh K, Baba J, et al. Complex structure of cytochrome c-cytochrome c oxidase reveals a novel protein-protein interaction mode. EMBO J 2017;36:291-300. 10.15252/embj.201695021
    1. Sommer AP, Hodeck KF, Zhu D, et al. Breathing Volume into Interfacial Water with Laser Light. J Phys Chem Lett 2011;2:562-5. 10.1021/jz2001503
    1. DeVault D, Chance B. Studies of photosynthesis using a pulsed laser. I. Temperature dependence of cytochrome oxidation rate in chromatium. Evidence for tunneling. Biophys J 1966;6:825-47.
    1. DeVault D, Parkes JH, Chance B. Electron tunnelling in cytochromes. Nature 1967;215:642-4. 10.1038/215642a0
    1. Benjamin I, Evans D, Nitzan A. Electron tunneling through water layers: Effect of layer structure and thickness. J Chem Phys 1997;106:6647. 10.1063/1.474079
    1. Hahn JR, Hong YA, Kang H. Electron tunneling across an interfacial water layer inside an STM junction: tunneling distance, barrier height and water polarization effect. Applied Physics A 1998;66:S467-72. 10.1007/s003390051184
    1. Lin J, Balabin IA, Beratan DN. The nature of aqueous tunneling pathways between electron-transfer proteins. Science 2005;310:1311-3. 10.1126/science.1118316
    1. Walski T, Dąbrowska K, Drohomirecka A, et al. The effect of red-to-near-infrared (R/NIR) irradiation on inflammatory processes. Int J Radiat Biol 2019;95:1326-36. 10.1080/09553002.2019.1625464
    1. Sommer AP, Zhu D, Försterling HD, et al. Crystalline Water at Room Temperature − Under Water and in Air. Cryst Growth Des 2008;8:2620-2. 10.1021/cg800382x
    1. Beiser A. Concepts of Modern Physics, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, 1995:179-81.
    1. Lima PLV, Pereira CV, Nissanka N, et al. Photobiomodulation enhancement of cell proliferation at 660 nm does not require cytochrome c oxidase. J Photochem Photobiol B 2019;194:71-5. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.03.015
    1. Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer's disease: Has the light dawned? Photonics 2019. doi: .10.3390/photonics6030077

Source: PubMed

3
订阅