Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness (COMPETE III)

October 18, 2016 updated by: Dr. Anne Holbrook, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

A Randomized Trial of Electronic Integration of Care for Better Vascular Outcomes: The Compete III Study Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness (COMPETE III)

Vascular diseases (cardiac events, strokes, peripheral vascular disease) remain the number one killer in Canadian society as well as the leading cause of hospitalization and days spent in the hospital. A 1996 estimate placed Ontario's vascular disease financial burden at $5.5 billion in total. Any intervention which lowers vascular risk, will have a direct impact on the quantity and quality of life and costs of health care. Further integration of health professionals in teams focused on chronic disease management in individuals and populations is also ripe for further evaluation. Increased collaboration between family physicians, physician specialists, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists are generally thought to be beneficial for patient outcomes, but the literature is inconclusive and their cost-effectiveness is unproven. In addition, combining centralized electronic up-to-date information on the patient's status with evidence-based recommendations and the ability to communicate either electronically or by phone is expected to result in improved access to care, quality of care, continuity of care and increase cost-effectiveness of chronic disease management.

COMPETE III builds on the researchers' previous work to study an electronic vascular tracking and decision support system shared by patients and their physicians, combined with a clinical care coordinator and automated telephone support system. The researchers are evaluating its impact on vascular risk processes and outcomes, perceived usefulness, ease of use, need for improvement, medication adherence, quality of life and patient goals and motivation.

Study hypothesis: Patients at increased risk of vascular events, if connected with their family physicians, medical specialists and care coordinator via an electronic network (Web, fax and telephone) sharing an intensive tracking, advice and support program, will lower their vascular risk more than those in usual care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

COMPETE is Canada's original electronic medical record research network and specializes in the rigorous development, implementation and evaluation of electronic technologies in health care. COMPETE III will build on COMPETE II to incorporate the latest evidence on:

  1. the management of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and previous vascular events,
  2. improving patient-clinician interactions,
  3. the use of technology to enhance the quality, safety and efficiency of care and
  4. motivational strategies to change both patient and clinician behaviour.

Specifically, the researchers will:

  1. Expand the disease focus to a vascular risk population (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia or previous vascular event);
  2. Expand the electronic care network beyond patients and primary care providers to also include specialists (physician specialists, specialty nurse clinicians, etc);
  3. Expand the geographical network from Hamilton area, and Ottawa to include other primary care reform (PCR), Ontario Family Health Networks (OFHN) or EHR using sites;
  4. Tighten the integration with the leading Ontario EHR products and concentrate on those meeting the new Ontario Smart Systems for Health Clinical Management System specifications,
  5. Strengthen the clinical decision support by offering evidence-based algorithms specific to the patient, provide specific formulary advice - drug listing, Limited Use prescriptions and codes, Section 8 criteria and form letters;
  6. Improve the researchers pharmacosurveillance network which pursues reasons for starting and stopping medications by seeking adherence information directly from patients;
  7. Provide direct links via Internet for patients and clinicians to best evidence about vascular disease,
  8. Improve the automated telephone support (ATS);
  9. Support physicians in managing this advanced care network by providing clinical care coordinators, either nurse clinicians or clinical pharmacists;
  10. Use HL-7 messaging standards as per Canada Health Infoway guidelines;
  11. Rigorously evaluate the cost-effectiveness of our package intervention in order to provide specific advice to health planners and payers on costs and benefits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1G6
        • Centre for Evaluation of Medicines

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 55 years of age and over
  • Regular patients of a family physician's office (at least one visit in the last 12 months)
  • Vascular disease (previous myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease) or at least one of the following vascular risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The comparison of change in vascular monitoring process total score (proportion of process targets met in group) between intervention and control groups.
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Vascular outcome targets
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Provider satisfaction, perceived value
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Patient satisfaction, self-efficacy, access to care
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Health data privacy and security
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Patient Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: 6 months to 1 year
6 months to 1 year
Facilitators, predictors and barriers to the success of project
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Scalability and sustainability
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne M Holbrook, PharmD MD MSc, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe