Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) to Treat Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

October 22, 2013 updated by: Valerie Biousse, Emory University

Visual Field Defects in Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: Effect of Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT)

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of Vision Restoration Therapy, VRT, on the visual function of patients with unilateral or bilateral AION, who have good central vision (at least 20/60) and altitudinal visual field defects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) is one of the most common causes of optic neuropathy after the age of 50. There is currently no available treatment and although up to 40% of patients have some spontaneous improvement within the first few months, most patients remain visually devastated. About 50% of patients retain relatively spared central visual acuity with an inferior altitudinal visual field defect. These patients usually complain of difficulty reading and loss of depth perception.

Recently, training-induced enlargement of visual field defects has been demonstrated in some patients with VF defects secondary to lesions of the retrochiasmal visual pathways. This computer-based Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) was developed in Germany and has been FDA-cleared in the United States for the past one year.

VRT is currently available at Emory for patients with homonymous hemianopia. Patients work on personally-designed software (on a laptop at home) twice daily (30 minutes each) for 6 months. Zones of partially damaged neurons, which are usually located between the intact and damaged area of the visual field (transition zone) are deliberately stimulated by VRT. There is only anecdotal evidence that this visual restoration therapy may be helpful in enlarging the visual field of patients with optic neuropathies.

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the effect of VRT on the visual function of patients with unilateral or bilateral AION, who have good central vision (at least 20/60) and altitudinal visual field defects. The effect of VRT will be evaluated by visual acuity, color vision, stereo vision, Humphrey VF (24-2 SITA standard) testing, and scales evaluating reading speed and vision-based quality of life. These measures will be repeated before VRT, at 3 months, at 6 months, and at 1 year after VRT. 20 patients will be included in the study. Patients will be randomized at inclusion between VRT and sham (placebo)-training (10 in each group). The 10 patients receiving sham training will then receive VRT for the following 6 months if they so choose. All data will be analyzed in a blinded fashion. The company developing VRT in the United States (NOVAVISION) has agreed to provide VRT and sham-training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients seen by Dr Biousse or Dr Newman in the Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit at Emory University.
  • Age ≥ 30 years.
  • Diagnosis of non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy at least 6 months prior to inclusion.
  • Uni- or bilateral AION (in case of bilateral AION, only one eye will be included in the study).
  • Best corrected visual acuity of at least 20/60 in the study eye
  • Altitudinal or arcuate visual field defect, splitting fixation by >10 decibel difference above and below horizontal meridian.
  • Stable visual function demonstrated by more than two stable visual acuity measurements and two automated visual field testings prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patient willing, and able, to spend 60 minutes-a-day for 6 months working on a computer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient cognitively or physically unable to perform reliable automated perimetry testing (on the 24-2 SITA Standard program) (which is grossly equivalent to the effort and attention needed to perform VRT daily at home).
  • Other cause of optic neuropathy.
  • Associated ocular disease requiring treatments or responsible for visual loss (such as untreated significant cataract, glaucoma, age related macular degeneration, etc…).
  • Visual acuity worse than 20/60 in the study eye.
  • Non-stable visual field defect on previous evaluations.
  • Epilepsy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Visual Function

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Valerie Biousse, MD, Emory Eye Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe