Efficacy and Safety of Xepol (Human Immunoglobulin) in Subjects With Post-Polio Syndrome (PPS)

April 2, 2007 updated by: Calliditas Therapeutics AB

Efficacy and Safety of Xepol (Human Immunoglobulin) in Subjects With Post-Polio Syndrome (PPS): A Randomized, Two-Arm, Parallel, Double-Blind, Multi-Centre, Placebo Controlled Study

The primary objective was to assess the effect of Xepol compared to placebo on physical health and on muscle strength in subjects with post-polio syndrome.The secondary objective was to assess the effect of Xepol compared to placebo on functional balance, activity patterns, pain, fatigue, sleep, vitality, muscular strength, pulmonary capacity, walking ability, balance and safety.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study Rationale:

In an earlier open and non-controlled study in 10 patients with PPS, Xepol was given during three days. The patients showed improvements in muscular strength and co-ordination and a decrease in pain. The aim of this study was to investigate if these findings can be confirmed in a larger, double-blind, randomised and placebo controlled study.

There are no simple clinical findings and specific laboratory changes that can be used to indicate the severity and progress of PPS. Different self-reporting questionnaires and objective measures of disability have often been used in clinical studies including SF-36 questionnaire, muscle strength measurement and walking test. The primary and secondary variables in this study were based on the clinical experience and literature reviewed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Danderyd, Sweden
        • Danderyd Hospital
      • Gothenburg, Sweden
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden, SE-141 86
        • Huddinge University Hospital
      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Uppsala Academic Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female subjects ≥18 to ≤75 years of age.
  2. Post-polio syndrome according to Halstead and Gawne:

    • History of polio virus infection
    • Restitution or improvement regarding motor function and disabilities after initial infection
    • Confirmed polio by EMG
    • Subjectively increased muscular weakness after a period of at least 15 years functional stability
    • No other explanation but post-polio syndrome to the symptoms
  3. Confirmed polio by EMG in the lower extremities in at least two of the following major muscle groups; musculi quadriceps, gastrocnemicus and tibialis anterior. (Two affected muscle groups in the same extremity were accepted).
  4. Subjectively increased muscular difficulties or pain after a period of at least 15 years functional stability.
  5. A muscle that had deteriorated within the last five years, and had 20-75 % of the muscle strength compared to age matched normal population when measured by a dynamometer or an electronic grip force sensor (GRIPPIT).
  6. Stable weight (defined as weight change <7 kg) during the last five years.
  7. Body Mass Index (BMI) £ 29 kg/m2.
  8. Subjects capable to understand given information and had signed the Informed Consent Form after full discussion of the research nature of the treatment and its risks and benefits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known or suspected intolerance to trial product or related products (e.g. sorbitol, glucose and fructose).
  2. Selective IgA deficiency.
  3. Inability to walk with walking aids.
  4. Any active malignancy, history of active malignancy or treatment for malignancy during the last three years.
  5. Disabling pain from extremities or skeletal system due to previous fracture(s), arthritis or other reasons not related to PPS.
  6. Subjects who received or who within 12 weeks prior to enrolment received any immunosuppressive/ systemic corticosteroid treatment (topical corticosteroids excluded).
  7. Treatment with intravenous human immunoglobulin for the Post-polio syndrome within six months prior to the first screening visit.
  8. Participation in any other study during this study and the receipt of any investigational drug within three months prior to the screening visit.
  9. Pregnancy or lactation or females of childbearing potential taking inadequate measures to prevent pregnancy.
  10. Hepatitis or HIV disease.
  11. Increased liver enzymes (ASAT, ALAT, γGT) above twice the upper normal value.
  12. Creatine kinase >10 mkat/l.
  13. Any disease or treatment that according to the discretion of the Investigator could pose a medical threat to the subject in combination with study drug, i.e. clinical manifested severe cardiovascular disease or severe arteriosclerosis or severe psychiatric disorder or other treatment that affected the immunological system such as prednisone and methotrexate.
  14. Any disease or condition that according to the discretion of the Investigator would obstruct the subject from performing the tests in the protocol (e.g. fill in the questionnaires).
  15. Conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance (e.g. known drug or alcohol abuse).
  16. Previous participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Primary endpoints:
Physical health was quantified using the SF-36 questionnaire scales summarized into the composite Physical Component Summary (PCS) measure.
Muscular strength was measured using a dynamometer or anelectronic grip force sensor (GRIPPIT) depending on the musclechosen.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Adverse events
Physical examination
Secondary endpoints:
Functional balance was assessed by using the Timed "Up and Go" (TUG) test.
Activity pattern was assessed by the Physical Activity Scale of the Elderly (PASE).
Pain was assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale and by a pain drawing.
Fatigue was assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) questionnaire.
Vitality was assessed using the vitality subscale (VT) of SF-36 questionnaire.
Sleep was assessed using the Sleep quality scale.
Muscular strength measured by a dynamometer and an electronic grip force sensor (GRIPPIT) for those muscles not included as the primary endpoint.
Walking ability was assessed by a 6 minutes walking test.
Pulmonary capacity (vital capacity, FEV1, FEV %) was measured by a standard spirometer method.
Balance was assessed as postural sway velocity and the subject's ability to voluntarily sway to various locations in space (NeuroCom Balance Master) or balance assessed by static and dynamic posturography (Chattecx® balance system)
Vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate)
Laboratory tests

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristian Borg, MD, Prof, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine;Huddinge University Hospital; Stockholm, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Study Completion

May 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 3, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2007

Last Verified

September 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe