Evaluation of a Living With Hope Program

January 5, 2016 updated by: University of Saskatchewan

Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Psychosocial Supportive Hope Focused Program for Patients With Advanced Cancer

The Living with Hope program was developed by the research team, a panel of experts and palliative patients and their families. The program was evaluated with 60 advanced cancer patients 60 years of age and older. Thirty received the program and 30 did not. After one week, those receiving the Living with Hope Program had higher hope and quality of life scores compared to those who did not. This suggests that the program is effective in increasing hope and quality of life for older palliative care patients with cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overall purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a psychosocial supportive intervention called "Living with Hope Program" (LWHP) in increasing hope and quality of life for older adult community-living terminally ill cancer patients. Using a mixed method concurrent nested experimental design, 60 terminally ill cancer patients over the age of 60 years were randomly assigned to a treatment and control group. Baseline hope [Herth Hope Index (HHI)] and quality of life scores [McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, (MQOL)] were collected at the first visit in the patients' homes by trained research assistants. Those in the treatment group received the LWHP, which consisted of viewing an international award winning video on hope and a choice of one of three hope activities to work on over a one-week period. The control group received standard care. Hope and quality of life data were collected one week later from both groups. Qualitative data using open-ended hope questions were collected from the treatment group.

Subjects receiving the Living with Hope Program had statistically significant higher hope (U=255, p=.005) and quality of life scores at visit two (U=294.5, p=.027) than those in the control group. Qualitative data confirmed this finding with the majority (61.5%) of subjects in the treatment group reporting the LWHP increased their hope. This preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the LWHP suggests that it may increase hope and quality of life for older terminally ill cancer patients at home.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for the study is; a) male or female 60 years of age and over, b) diagnosed with cancer, c) receiving palliative home care services d) English speaking, e) able to give informed consent and participate in the study as determined by the Palliative Care Coordinator or SWADD team's assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria includes patients who are non-autonomous adults, cognitively impaired as determined by the SWADD team and or unable in the opinion of the SWADD team to participate-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Hope (Herth Hope Index) and Quality of Life (MacGill Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Saskatchewan

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wendy Duggleby, University of Saskatchewan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Study Completion

February 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BSC 03-899

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe