"Loss of Resistance" Versus CompuFlo® for Epidural Placement

November 3, 2020 updated by: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

A Randomized Clinical Comparison of the "Loss of Resistance" Technique Versus the CompuFlo® Computerized Syringe Pump for Proper Epidural Placement

The purpose of this study is to compare how well the CompuFlo® computerized syringe pump works as compared to the traditional method of inserting an epidural (a needle placed in one's back to give pain medicine).

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It is possible to utilize epidural anesthesia as the sole anesthetic technique for thoracic, abdominal, and lower extremity surgeries, as a method of postoperative pain management after surgery, and for pain relief during labor and delivery. However, despite the various benefits of epidural anesthesia, this procedure is not utilized to its maximum potential in the operating room. One reason for inadequate utilization of this procedure is the difficulty in properly identifying the epidural space. Current techniques for identifying the epidural space rely on the subjective perception of the operator on loss of resistance to air or saline as the needle passes from the ligamentum flavum into the epidural space. CompuFlo®'s pressure-sensing technology provides an objective measurement for proper placement of the epidural.

Very little advancement has been made in improving training to identify the correct location of the epidural space. Epidural anesthesia has a relatively higher failure rate when performed by residents in training. The skills of trainees differ greatly, and there are no standard teaching methods to teach epidural anesthesia. Statistical analysis conducted by Naik et al. concluded that some residents may need as many as 75 attempts at epidural anesthesia to ensure proficiency.

The CompuFlo® is a computerized syringe pump capable of volume and pressure-controlled infusion. It has a pressure sensor and a mathematical algorithm capable of determining the pressure at the needle tip. Pressures are continuously monitored and displayed, which are reflected by acoustic changes in tone. A dramatic pressure decrease and a high tissue compliance (pressure does not increase despite continuous infusion) signifies entrance into the epidural space. Combining a program with a low upper pressure limit and a high infusion rate mimics the technique used by the loss of resistance with saline proponents (constant pressure on the plunger). It combines the "feel" of inserting an epidural needle with the visualization of the pressure level, as well as a sound indicator to indicate proper placement.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Memorial Hermann Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any obstetric patient presenting for vaginal delivery desiring epidural anesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification I-III
  • Aged 18-65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Obstetric patients presenting for Cesarean section
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification ≥ IV
  • Contraindications for epidural anesthesia
  • Allergy to local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Number of attempts
Incidence of incorrect epidural placement
Pain level 1-10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Subjective difficulty in placing epidural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oscar Ghelber, M.D., The University of Texas Medical School at Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-04-248

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe