Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Treat Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy

Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy. - Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. A Randomised Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Urinary incontinence is a well known side effect of radical prostatectomy. The prevalence differs according to time period after the operation and the definition of incontinence used. However, a prevalence of 10-20% have been reported one year after the operation. Pelvic floor muscle training has been suggested as a treatment of urinary incontinence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.We conduct a randomized clinical trial, comparing one group(n=40) following a pelvic floor muscle training program after prostatectomy and one group (n=40) receiving only standard information.Primary outcome variable is self registration of urinary incontinence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Trondheim, Norway
        • Clinical Services, St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer prostata operated (radical prostatectomy)
  • Incontinence after separation of catheter
  • Understands Norwegian language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Drug/alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Strength training of the pelvic floor muscles with follow up instructions by a physiotherapist

Group A followed a pelvic floor muscle exercise course consisting of intensive pelvic floor muscle training with follow up instructions (training group or DVD instructions)by a physiotherapist;3 x 10 contractions daily.

Group B were instructed to train the pelvic floor muscles 3 x 10 contractions daily without follow up instructions by a physiotherapist.

Other Names:
  • Physiotherapy, pelvic floor muscle training
Active Comparator: 2
Strength training of the pelvic floor muscles without follow up instructions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
self reported continence (no need for wearing a pad)at 3 months
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: one year
one year
Self reported time period from operation to continence.
Time Frame: One year
One year
24 hours home pad test registering grams of urine
Time Frame: One year
One year
Pelvic floor muscle strength
Time Frame: one year
one year
Erectile dysfunction
Time Frame: one year
one year
Perceived problems with urinary function
Time Frame: One year
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Siv Mørkved, PhD, Clinical Services, St Olavs Hospital/ Dept.of Community Medicine and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe