Lifestyle Change and Quality of Life in Obese Patients With Stage I/II Endometrial Cancer in Remission

July 22, 2020 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Lifestyle Change and Quality of Life in Obese Endometrial Cancer Survivors

RATIONALE: Exercise and dietary counseling may affect weight loss and improve the quality of life of obese endometrial cancer patients and may help them live longer and more comfortably.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying the effects of exercise and dietary counseling on weight loss and quality of life of obese patients with stage I or stage II endometrial cancer in remission.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the combined effect of exercise and dietary counseling on the weight loss and quality of life of obese patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer in remission.

Secondary

  • Determine the feasibility and acceptability of lifestyle interventions in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled study. Patients are stratified according to age and body mass index (25-29.9 vs ≥ 30). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo weekly contact with a dietitian; exercise intervention for 6 months; and physician counseling at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
  • Arm II: Patients undergo quality of life, exercise, and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 1 year.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 60 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5047
        • Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed endometrial cancer meeting the following criteria:

    • Stage I or II disease
    • Post-operative total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
    • Disease in remission
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Performance status

  • ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Not specified

Renal

  • Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Not specified

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lifestyle counseling
Patients undergo weekly contact with a dietitian; exercise intervention for 6 months; and physician counseling.Patients undergo quality of life, exercise, and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patients undergo weekly contact with a dietitian; exercise intervention for 6 months; and physician counseling at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patients undergo weekly contact with a dietitian; exercise intervention for 6 months; and physician counseling at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patients undergo weekly contact with a dietitian; exercise intervention for 6 months; and physician counseling at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patients undergo weekly contact with a dietitian; exercise intervention for 6 months; and physician counseling at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Active Comparator: Without Counseling
Patients undergo quality of life, exercise, and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patients undergo quality of life assessments and clinical assessments at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for General Cancer (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Fatigue (FACT-F) at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Weight loss as measured by weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, Weight Efficacy Life Style Questionnaire, Three Factor Eating Inventory Questionnaire, and Leisure Score index at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Functional status as measured by ECOG performance status, and short-form health survey with 36 questions (SF-36)
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Comorbidities as measured by Charlson Co-Morbidity Score at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe