- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00271544
Attain Model 4196 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead
September 24, 2009 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart.
This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes.
When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat.
In certain heart failure cases, when the two lower chambers of the heart no longer beat in a coordinated manner, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be prescribed.
CRT is similar to a pacemaker.
It is placed (implanted) under the skin of the upper chest.
CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three or four leads (flexible insulated wires) that are inserted through the veins to the heart.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new lead for delivering energy to the left ventricle (bottom left chamber of the heart).
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
190
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada
-
-
-
-
Alaska
-
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States
-
Palo Alto, California, United States
-
-
Iowa
-
Davenport, Iowa, United States
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
-
-
Louisiana
-
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
-
-
Tennessee
-
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
-
-
Vermont
-
Burlington, Vermont, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- QRS greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds (The QRS interval is a measurement of how the electrical signal involved in a heart beat travels, or is conducted, through the ventricles. A wide QRS (more than 120) suggests that there is a conduction problem, or block, in the ventricles.)
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) less than or equal to 35 percent (Ejection Fraction is a measurement of how well the left ventricle pumps blood out to the rest of the body. The higher the EF the more blood the ventricle is pumping.)
- Subject has moderate to severe heart failure despite medications
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with a previous lead in the left ventricle or previous implant attempt within 30 days of implant or ongoing complications from a previous unsuccessful attempt
- Subjects with chest pain or who have had a heart attack within the past month before enrollment in the study
- Subjects that have had certain surgeries on their heart within the past three months
- Subjects with chronic (permanent) fast heart beats in the upper chambers of the heart (atrial arrhythmias)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 4196 Lead
Non-randomized study.
|
implant and follow-up of study device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4196 Lead Related Complication)
Time Frame: One Month
|
A subject who was free of a Model 4196 lead related complication by one month visit.
|
One Month
|
|
Efficacy (Pacing Voltage Thresholds of Distal Tip Electrode)
Time Frame: One Month
|
Model 4196 lead distal tip electrode mean pacing voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms])
|
One Month
|
|
Efficacy (Pacing Voltage Threshold of Proximal Ring Electrode)
Time Frame: Three Months
|
Model 4196 lead proximal ring electrode mean pacing voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms])
|
Three Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Model 4196 Lead
Time Frame: Implant
|
A successful implant occurs when the Model 4196 lead is implanted in the left ventricle of the heart and functions appropriately.
|
Implant
|
|
Subjects Successfully Implanted After Cannulation
Time Frame: Implant
|
A successful implant occurs when the coronary sinus (CS) is successfully cannulated and a left ventricular lead is implanted in the left ventricle of the heart and functions appropriately.
|
Implant
|
|
All Left Ventricular Leads
Time Frame: Implant
|
All left ventricular leads successfully implanted
|
Implant
|
|
All Medtronic Left Ventricular Leads (Attain Family)
Time Frame: Implant
|
All Medtronic left ventricular leads (Lead Model Numbers included 4193, 4194, 4195 and 4196) successfully implanted
|
Implant
|
|
Cannulation Time
Time Frame: Implant
|
Cannulation time was defined as the time from insertion of the first CS cannulation catheter to the first CS cannulation.
|
Implant
|
|
Fluoroscopy Time
Time Frame: Implant
|
Fluoroscopy time was defined as the total time the fluoroscope was imaging.
|
Implant
|
|
Model 4196 Lead Placement Time
Time Frame: Implant
|
Model 4196 lead placement time was defined as the time from insertion of the successfully placed lead to the time when it was placed in the first acceptable pacing location.
|
Implant
|
|
Total Implant Time
Time Frame: Implant
|
Total implant time was defined as time from initial incision to final closure.
|
Implant
|
|
Assessment of Lead Handling Characteristics
Time Frame: Implant
|
Lead handling characteristics assessed as "acceptable" by physicians
|
Implant
|
|
Electrical Performance - Tip Electrode: Sensing
Time Frame: 12-month
|
Model 4196 lead tip electrode R-wave amplitude
|
12-month
|
|
Electrical Performance - Tip Electrode: LV Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 12-month
|
Model 4196 lead tip electrode LV voltage threshold
|
12-month
|
|
Electrical Performance -Tip Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 12-month
|
Model 4196 lead tip electrode pacing impedance
|
12-month
|
|
Electrical Performance -Ring Electrode: Sensing
Time Frame: Implant
|
Model 4196 lead ring electrode R-wave amplitude
|
Implant
|
|
Electrical Performance - Ring Electrode: LV Voltage Threshold
Time Frame: 12-month
|
Model 4196 lead ring electrode LV voltage threshold
|
12-month
|
|
Electrical Performance -Ring Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time Frame: 12-Month
|
Model 4196 lead ring electrode pacing impedance
|
12-Month
|
|
Summarize All Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
|
All adverse events were collected for this trial such as, but not limited to, the following: Atrial Fibrillation, Chest Pain, Pneumonia, Cold/Flu
|
Up to 18 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian Ramza, MD, PHD, St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City MO
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2007
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2005
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 30, 2005
First Posted (Estimate)
January 2, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
September 28, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 24, 2009
Last Verified
September 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 241 (Registry Identifier: University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Turkey))
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.