Outcomes Following Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adults

November 25, 2013 updated by: Brian Kogon, Emory University

Review of Outcomes Following Pulmonary Valve Replacement for Congenital Heart Disease in Adults

One of the most common residual lesions in adult survivors of pediatric cardiac surgery is pulmonary valve disease, particularly regurgitation.

Multiple studies have demonstrated that placement of a pulmonary valve in such patients, results in improved ventricular function and resolution of symptoms. However, the optimal prosthetic valve for use in the pulmonary position has not been defined. There are essentially three alternatives available: the stented bioprosthetic valve, stentless bioprosthetic "tube" grafts used to replace the entire right ventricular outflow tract and mechanical valves.

All three of these valve options have been used in adults with congenital heart disease at Emory Healthcare and at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston.

The goal of this study is to evaluate and compare the indications and short and mid-term outcomes for these alternative therapies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients who have received a pulmonary valve replacement for congenital heart disease at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston or are in the Emory Healthcare System between 1976 and 2004.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul M Kirshbom, MD, Emory University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Disease, Congenital

Subscribe