- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00306995
Safety Study of Pandemic Candidate Influenza Vaccines in the Elderly Population
February 6, 2020 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
A Phase III, Open, Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Vaccination Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Various Formulations of a Monovalent Candidate Pandemic Influenza A Vaccine in Individuals Over 60 Years of Age
Influenza pandemics are caused by viruses that possess an Hemagglutinin molecule to which most of the population lacks immunity.
If such virus is pathogenic to human and demonstrates the ability to transmit from person to person, the result is a global outbreak of disease that affects a high percentage of individuals in a short period of time and is likely to cause substantially increased mortality and morbidity in all countries of the world.
Recently, purely avian influenza viruses, including the H5N1, H9N2 and H7N7 subtypes, have been directly transmitted to humans, raising concern over the possibility of a new influenza pandemic among the world's immunologically naive populations.
In order to face this kind of situation, a pandemic influenza vaccine has to be developed.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
385
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Brandenburg
-
Finsterwalde, Brandenburg, Germany, 03238
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Ketzin, Brandenburg, Germany, 14669
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Niedersachsen
-
Tostedt, Niedersachsen, Germany, 21255
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Sachsen
-
Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01307
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01219
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Geringswalde, Sachsen, Germany, 09326
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Schmiedeberg, Sachsen, Germany, 01762
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Schleswig-Holstein
-
Bad Bramstedt, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24576
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Bad Segeberg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 23795
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Elmshorn, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 25335
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Subjects who the investigator believes that they can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol
- A male or female aged over 60 years at the time of vaccination.
- Written informed consent obtained from the subject.
Exclusion criteria:
- Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study vaccine(s) within 30 days preceding the administration of the study vaccine, or planned use during the study period.
- Participation in an earlier study with a candidate pandemic H9N2 vaccine.
- Acute disease at the time of enrolment.
- Acute clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality
- History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine.
- Drug and/or alcohol dependency.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SB218352_15 Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 1 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 1 vaccine
|
|
Experimental: SB218352_8 Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 2 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 2 vaccine
|
|
Experimental: SB218352_4 Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 3 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 3 vaccine
|
|
Experimental: SB218352_2 Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 4 non-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 4 vaccine
|
|
Experimental: SB218352_8AL Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 2 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Pandemic influenza A formulation 2 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine
|
|
Experimental: SB218352_4AL Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 3 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Pandemic influenza A formulation 3 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine
|
|
Experimental: SB218352_2AL Group
Male and female subjects over 60 years of age, healthy or with underlying disease, received 2 doses of SB218352 pandemic influenza A formulation 4 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, administered in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm, at Day 0 and Day 21.
|
Pandemic influenza A formulation 4 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Serum Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)
Time Frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
|
At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
|
Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
|
At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer lower than (<) 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre higher than or equal to (≥) 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer
|
At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer
|
At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
|
Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 10 compared to day 0.
|
At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
|
Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 compared to day 0.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
|
At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
|
At Day 10 post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 1
|
|
Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
|
At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
|
Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
|
At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in postvaccination titer
|
At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
|
Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer
|
At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
Seroconversion factor defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 42) compared to day 0.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
|
Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 and Day 386 for Subset 2) compared to day 0.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
|
Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2
Time Frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
|
At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: During the 30-days (Day 0-30) post vaccination
|
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.
|
During the 30-days (Day 0-30) post vaccination
|
|
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Day 0 to Day 51
|
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q.
invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).
|
From Day 0 to Day 51
|
|
Frequency of Antigen-specific Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T-cells
Time Frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post vaccination
|
Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).
|
At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post vaccination
|
|
Frequency of Antigen-specific CD4 T-cells
Time Frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).
|
At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
|
Cytokine-positive CD4 T-cells Frequency
Time Frame: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).
Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine.
CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination).
The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.
|
At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
|
Frequency of Antigen-specific Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells
Time Frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).
|
At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
|
Frequency of Antigen-specific CD8 T-cells
Time Frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).
|
At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
|
Cytokine-positive CD8 T-cells Frequency
Time Frame: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).
Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine.
CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination).
The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.
|
At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
|
|
Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms
Time Frame: During the 4-days post Dose 1 (Days 0-3), post Dose 2 (Days 21-24) and across these doses
|
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling.
Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade.
Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities.
Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).
|
During the 4-days post Dose 1 (Days 0-3), post Dose 2 (Days 21-24) and across these doses
|
|
Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms
Time Frame: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling.
Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade.
Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities.
Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).
|
During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms
Time Frame: During the 4-days (Day 0-3) post Dose 1
|
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating.
Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination.
Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity.
Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C.
Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
|
During the 4-days (Day 0-3) post Dose 1
|
|
Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms
Time Frame: During the 4-days post Dose 2 (Days 21-24)
|
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating.
Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination.
Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity.
Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C.
Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
|
During the 4-days post Dose 2 (Days 21-24)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms
Time Frame: During the 4-Days (Day 0-3) across doses 1 and 2
|
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating.
Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination.
Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity.
Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C.
Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
|
During the 4-Days (Day 0-3) across doses 1 and 2
|
|
Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms
Time Frame: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)
|
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axilar temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating.
Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination.
Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity.
Grade 3 fever = fever higher than (>) 39°C.
Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
|
During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Unsolicited AEs
Time Frame: During the 30-days post Dose 3 (Days 189-219 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-395 for Subset 2 groups)
|
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.
|
During the 30-days post Dose 3 (Days 189-219 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-395 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Subjects With SAEs
Time Frame: Within the 365-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-364 for Subset 1 groups) and within the 395-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-394 for Subset 2 groups)
|
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q.
invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).
|
Within the 365-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-364 for Subset 1 groups) and within the 395-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-394 for Subset 2 groups)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Any SAEs
Time Frame: Up to 30-day post Dose 3 (Days 365-394)
|
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q.
invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).
Only Subset 2 groups had available data for the specified time frame.
|
Up to 30-day post Dose 3 (Days 365-394)
|
|
Number of Subjects With Antibody Persistence
Time Frame: At Days 189 and 365
|
Antibody persistence was evaluated in terms of seroprotection rate (SPR) against influenza A subtype H9N2 and seroconversion rate (SCR) against influenza A subtype H9N2.
|
At Days 189 and 365
|
|
Seroconversion Factor (SCF) for Influenza A Subtype H9N2.
Time Frame: At Days 189 and 365
|
SCF was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs at the post-vaccination time points compared to Day 0, for each vaccine strain.
|
At Days 189 and 365
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 11, 2005
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 4, 2006
Study Completion (Actual)
July 4, 2006
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2006
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 24, 2006
First Posted (Estimate)
March 27, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 10, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 6, 2020
Last Verified
February 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 102499
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Study Data/Documents
-
Individual Participant Data Set
Information identifier: 102499Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Dataset Specification
Information identifier: 102499Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Clinical Study Report
Information identifier: 102499Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Study Protocol
Information identifier: 102499Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
-
Informed Consent Form
Information identifier: 102499Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Influenza
-
Novartis VaccinesCompletedInfluenza | Seasonal Influenza | Human Influenza | Influenza Due to Unspecified Influenza VirusBelgium
-
Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and...CompletedInfluenza A | Influenza A Virus Infection | Influenza Epidemic | Influenza H5N1Russian Federation
-
Canadian Immunization Research NetworkCHU de Quebec-Universite Laval; McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingAvian Influenza | H5N1 Virus | H5N1 Influenza | Avian Influenza A VirusCanada
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterHuman Vaccines ProjectCompletedVaccine Reaction | Influenza | Influenza, Human | Influenza A | Influenza Type B | Influenza A H3N2 | Influenza A H1N1United States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza | Avian Influenza | H1N1 InfluenzaUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...University of Oxford; Wellcome Trust; World Health OrganizationCompletedInfluenza | Avian Influenza | Severe InfluenzaSingapore, Thailand, Vietnam
-
Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd.JSYither Biotech Co., LtdActive, not recruitingInfluenza | Influenza VaccineChina
-
NPO PetrovaxCompletedVaccine Reaction | Influenza | Influenza, Human | Influenza A | Acute Respiratory Infection | Influenza Type B | Flu | Influenza A H3N2 | Influenza A H1N1 | Flu, Human | Influenza EpidemicRussian Federation
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed