- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00352612
Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections
Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin in the Empiric, Outpatient Treatment of Suspected Staphylococcal Cutaneous Infections in the Era of Community-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (CA-MRSA)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (CA-MRSA) infections have increased significantly over the past decade. Nearly every major region of the country has reported infections with this organism, with some areas reporting a prevalence as high as 80%. Epidemiologic evidence points to the emergence of a new strain of MRSA within the community, with unique genetic and clinical characteristics that differentiate it from traditional hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). Unlike HA-MRSA, these CA-MRSA are often susceptible in vitro to multiple antibiotic classes (other than penicillins and cephalosporins), and often cause significant, deep-seated abscesses in healthy individuals without any known risk factors for healthcare contact. Prior to awareness of this disease, many clinicians were using penicillin and cephalosporin antibiotics for empiric treatment of cutaneous abscesses, yet widespread treatment failures in the face of increasing CA-MRSA infections did NOT occur. During a one-year retrospective study in pediatric patients at our institution, we found that nearly 50% of CA-MRSA abscesses were treated with "inappropriate" antibiotics by susceptibility profiles without any significant adverse outcomes. Many clinicians are now confronted with the dilemma of whether to change empiric antibiotic therapy to other classes to which CA-MRSA would be expected to be susceptible; the most common choices including clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or vancomycin. Unfortunately, each of these antibiotics has problems of its own in terms of increased cost, poor palatability of pediatric liquid formulation, poorer side effect profile, or necessity of IV infusion, and at this time the optimal, empiric antibiotic treatment for presumed CA-MRSA skin and soft tissue infections is unclear.
The purpose of this study is to help define the role of antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric skin infections caused by CA-MRSA. We hypothesize that treatment with cephalexin, a penicillin-like antibiotic to which CA-MRSA would be expected to be resistant, does not result in poorer outcomes than treatment with clindamycin, an antibiotic to which CA-MRSA is most often susceptible.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children between the ages of 6 months and 18 years of age (inclusive)
- Suspected purulent staphylococcal skin or soft tissue infection
- No hospitalization within the previous 14 days
- Must have reliable means of follow-up contact (e.g. working phone)
- Outpatient management in the judgement of treating physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hospitalization on initial visit
- Voluntary withdrawal by the treating physician in order to dictate the antibiotic being used
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to or intolerance of cephalexin (or other beta lactams) or clindamycin.
- Patients with altered immunity (inherited or acquired)
- Patients with skin infections related to surgical wounds or hardware.
- Patients currently on antibiotic therapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: cephalexin
|
cephalexin suspension or tablets, 40mg/kg/day, given by mouth, divided TID, for 7 days
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: clindamycin
|
clindamycin suspension or tablets, 20mg/kg/day, given by mouth, divided TID, for 7 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Improvement at the 48-72 Hour Clinical Follow-up
Time Frame: 48-72 hour clinical follow-up
|
Clinical improvement was defined as improvement in at least one of the following four measures without regression in any: (1) erythema (2) pain (3) induration (4) patient or families self report of improvement.
|
48-72 hour clinical follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aaron E Chen, MD, Johns Hopkins University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Skin Diseases
- Inflammation
- Disease Attributes
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Bacterial Infections
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
- Suppuration
- Skin Diseases, Bacterial
- Hair Diseases
- Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Cellulitis
- Skin Diseases, Infectious
- Staphylococcal Skin Infections
- Staphylococcal Infections
- Folliculitis
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Protein Synthesis Inhibitors
- Clindamycin
- Clindamycin palmitate
- Clindamycin phosphate
- Cephalexin
Other Study ID Numbers
- NA_00003301
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.