Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks

September 27, 2013 updated by: Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, Pain Management Center of Paducah

A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Controlled Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks

  1. To demonstrate whether:

    i. Facet joint nerve blocks have therapeutic value beyond the duration of local anesthetic effect.

    ii. Adjuvant medications (Sarapin and Depo-steroids) provide additional relief of lumbar facet joint pain when used with facet joint nerve blocks.

  2. To demonstrate whether or not there are clinically significant improvements in function of patients who receive lumbar facet joint nerve block with or without Sarapin and Depo-steroids (Group II) compared to patients randomized to Group I who receive only local anesthetic blocks.
  3. To determine the adverse event profile in both groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Primary Outcome Measure(s) To demonstrate a clinically significant difference between the patients treated with adjuvants and those patients randomized to Group I in the pain status, physical, and psychological status and pain at 3, 6, 12, 18and 24 months post treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42003
        • Ambulatory Surgery Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive for facet joint pain with comparative local anesthetic blocks

Candidates are over 18 years of age

Subjects with a history of chronic, function limiting low back pain of at least six months in duration Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are able to understand this investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the center for all the required post-operative follow-ups The subject has not had recent surgical procedures within the last three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Negative or false-positive response to controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks

Narcotic use of greater than Hydrocodone 100 mg/day, Methadone 80 mg or Morphine 100 mg, or dose equivalent

Uncontrolled major Depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders

Uncontrolled or acute medical illnesses including coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, chronic liver dysfunction, progressive neurological deficit, urinary sphincter dysfunction, infection, increased intercranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri, intercranial tumors, unstable angina, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic severe conditions that could interfere with the interpretations of the outcome assessments for pain and bodily function

Women who are pregnant or lactating

Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment

Patients with multiple complaints involving concomitant hip osteoarthritis, will not be amenable to study due to the overlap of pain complaints.

Inability to achieve appropriate positioning and inability to understand informed consent and protocol History of adverse reaction to local anesthetic or anti-inflammatory drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1 Without Steroids
Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block with Local Anesthetic (0.5 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with/without 0.5 mL of Sarapin)
Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block
Experimental: Group 2 With Steroids
Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block with Local Anesthetic (0.5 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with/without 0.5 mL of Sarapin) and 0.15 mg of non-particulate betamethasone)
Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment
Numeric rating scale represented 0 with no pain and 10 with the worst pain imaginable.
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment.
Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI): ODI score is ranged from 0 to 50. Total score is converted in to percent disability. ODI Scoring: 0% to 20% (minimal disability), 21%-40% (moderate disability), 41%-60% (severe disability), 61%-80% (crippled) and 81%-100% (may be bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms).
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, Ambulatory Surgery Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • protocol3

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe