- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00358280
Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Limb Surgery
March 25, 2009 updated by: AstraZeneca
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multi-Centre, Parallel Group Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of 5 mg/ml Ropivacaine and 5 mg/ml Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Limb Surgery
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, duration of motor block until return to normal function in the non-operated leg after the start of injection, of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml when used for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Research Site
-
Guangzhou, China
- Research Site
-
Shanghai, China
- Research Site
-
Shenyang, China
- Research Site
-
Xi'an, China
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of written informed consent
- Men or women, 18 years £ age £ 70 years
- Patient scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgery with an estimated duration < 2 hours under spinal anaesthesia
- ASA category I ~ II
- 18.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 23.9
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to spinal anaesthesia, such as local infections, generalised septicaemia, platelet and clotting factor abnormalities, significant neurological disease with motor or sensory deficit, diagnosed increased intracranial pressure
- A known history of allergy, sensitivity or any other form of reaction to local anaesthetics of amide type
- Suspected inability to comply with the study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease, as judged by the investigator
- Psychiatric history or any other concomitant disease which may lead to unreliability in clinical assessments, as judged by the investigator
- Significant alcohol, drug or medication abuse, as judged by the investigator
- Women who are pregnant or lactating or women of child bearing potential who are not practising adequate contraception or have positive urine pregnancy test (a urine Human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG] analysis)
- Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff or staff at the study site)
- Previous enrolment in the present study
- Participation in a clinical study during the last 3 months
- Serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the subjects' safety or successful participation in the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
|---|
|
To compare the efficacy, duration of motor block until return to normal function in the non-operated leg after the start of injection, of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml when used for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing unilateral lower
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
|---|
|
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in the duration of sensory block at dermatome T10 level
|
|
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in the onset time of sensory block and motor block respectively
|
|
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in the quality of anaesthesia
|
|
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in subject pain during surgery
|
|
To determine the safety of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml by evaluating the incidence and severity of adverse events, blood pressure, pulse rate and blood loss
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: AstraZeneca China Medical Director, MD, AstraZeneca
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2006
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2006
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2006
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 28, 2006
First Posted (Estimate)
July 31, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 26, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 25, 2009
Last Verified
March 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D0695L00002
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia,Spinal
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedSpinal Anesthesia | Success or Failure of Spinal AnesthesiaKorea, Republic of
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompleted
-
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of TraumaRecruitingSpinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension | Geriatric Population | Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly PatientsPakistan
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompletedAnesthesia, Epidural | Anesthesia, Spinal | AntisepsisBrazil
-
San Salvatore Hospital of L'AquilaCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia; Functional | Spinal CordItaly
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedSpinal Anesthesia Evaluation | Analgesic | Intrathecal AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompletedAnesthesia, General | Anesthesia, Spinal | Umbilical CordTurkey
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedAnesthesia, SpinalKorea, Republic of
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompletedSpinal AnesthesiaCanada
Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine
-
Northern Jiangsu People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Peking University First HospitalCompletedEpidural Analgesia | Labor Pain | Dexmedetomidine | Esketamine | Ropivacaine | SufentanilChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruiting
-
Sahiwal medical college sahiwalCompletedBradycardia | Post Operative Analgesia | Opioid Sparing Anaesthesia | Hypotension, Controlled | Stoma Reversal ProcedurePakistan
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingBreast Neoplasms | Anesthesia, Local | Surgical Procedures, Operative | Pulmonary Ventilation | Intercostal Nerve Block
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingAnesthesia | Hallux ValgusBelgium
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingNerve Block | Ropivacaine | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Total Knee AnthroplastyChina
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRecruitingAnalgesia | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Preperitoneal InfiltrationChina
-
University Health Network, TorontoUnknownPIB Versus CI Through a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter for Analgesia Following Major Ankle SurgeryPain, PostoperativeCanada
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedPostoperative PainUnited States