Preservation of Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients With Certican Therapy

January 19, 2015 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Presentation of Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients With Certican Therapy: PROTECT Study A Twelve-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Certican-based Regimen Versus Calcineurin Inhibitor-based Regimen in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients

The study is designed to show that everolimus initiation together with reduction and thereafter discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) will improve significantly renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients as compared to continuation of CNI-based treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

276

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, A-6020
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wien, Austria, A-1090
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Jena, Germany, 07740
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CE
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Genève, Switzerland, 1211
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females 18 - 70 years old
  • Liver transplant recipient (living or deceased donor)
  • Patients in whom an allograft biopsy will not be contraindicated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of multiple solid organ transplants or patients that have already received a transplant in the past
  • HCV positive patients who need an active anti-viral treatment (HCV- positive patients without active antiviral treatment are allowed)
  • HIV positive patients
  • Patients who are breast feeding
  • Patients with a current severe systemic infection
  • Presence of any hypersensitivity to drugs similar to Certican® (e.g. macrolides)
  • Preexisting (i.e. not related to CNI-damage) renal dysfunction that, according to the judgment of the investigator, will not significantly improve after transplantation (i.e., for example, patients that are expected to have a cGFR below 50ml/min at 4 weeks post transplantation)
  • Patients that have received Simulect prior to this study.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Everolimus
Basiliximab plus everolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen following the reduction and cessation of initial CNI regimen plus optional steroids according to local best practice
All patients who met the eligibility criteria were treated with 2 doses of basiliximab on Day 0 (transplantation) and Day 4.
Other Names:
  • simulect
Patients who met the screening eligibility received CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy for 1 month. Then at week 4 (or week 8 at maximum), patients randomized to the CNI arm continued on CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy.
Active Comparator: Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)
Basiliximab plus CNI-based immunosuppressive regimen according to local best practice plus optional steroids according to local best practice
All patients who met the eligibility criteria were treated with 2 doses of basiliximab on Day 0 (transplantation) and Day 4.
Other Names:
  • simulect
Patients who met the screening eligibility received CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy for 1 month. Then at week 4 (or week 8 at maximum), patients randomized to the CNI arm continued on CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy.
Start dose of everolimus was 1.5 mg in the morning followed by 1.5 mg in the evening. After one week, the dose was adjusted to achieve trough levels between 5-12 ng/mL. Once trough levels were above 5ng/mL, the CNI dose was reduced to 70%. At week 8 post-baseline (latest at week 16 post baseline), CNI was completely discontinued. For patients receiving Ciclosporin A (CiA) as CNI, the everolimus dosage was adjusted to achieve a trough level of 8-12 ng/mL, prior to discontinuation of CiA. After discontinuation of CNI, everolimus was maintained at a trough level of 5-12 ng/mL.
Other Names:
  • certican

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)
Time Frame: Month 11
This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
Month 11

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Efficacy Failure
Time Frame: Month 11
Efficacy failure was defined as the composite endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death, lost to follow-up (from any reason), whichever occurred first. Incidence of efficacy failure was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).
Month 11
Incidence of the Need for a Change in the Immunosuppressive Regimen
Time Frame: Month 11
The incidence of any changes in the immunosuppressive regimen other than allowed in the study protocol (for example, introduction of Mycophenolic acid (MPA) or sirolimus) was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).
Month 11
Incidence of Renal Deterioration
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 11
Renal deterioration was defined as a decrease by ≥25% in the cGFR compared to baseline and confirmed by one consecutive measurement. The analysis of this outcome measure was omitted because of missing relevance.
Baseline, Month 11
Renal Function (cGFR)
Time Frame: Month 5
This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
Month 5
Incidence of Treated BPAR
Time Frame: Month 11
The incidence of treated BPAR was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).
Month 11
Patient and Graft Survival
Time Frame: Month 11
Patient survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, patient survival was censored as the date of last contact. Graft survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of graft loss. If a patient was not known to suffer from a graft loss or died without graft loss, time to graft loss was censored with date of last contact or date of death, respectively. Patient and graft survival were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Month 11
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive Patients
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 5
HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) was measured by real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR; copies per mL).
Baseline, Month 5
Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
Time Frame: From randomization to Month 11
Patients with all (serious and non-serious) adverse events, serious adverse events and death were reported.
From randomization to Month 11
Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
Time Frame: Month 12 to Month 59 post-baseline
Patients with all (serious and non-serious) adverse events, serious adverse events and death were reported.
Month 12 to Month 59 post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transplantation

Clinical Trials on basiliximab

Subscribe