Comparison of the Immunogenicity, Safety and Reactogenicity of FluBlok, To a Licensed Vaccine In Elderly Adults

December 16, 2009 updated by: Protein Sciences Corporation

Comparison of the Immunogenicity, Safety and Reactogenicity of FluBlok, Trivalent Recombinant Baculovirus-Expressed Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine, to a Licensed Egg-Grown Influenza Vaccine In Ambulatory Elderly Adults

The purpose of this study were to obtain additional evidence in support of the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) vaccine in an elderly population, and to establish non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the rHA vaccine when compared with a licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). Another purpose was to provide a preliminary estimate of the relative efficacy of the two vaccines against culture-positive influenza-like illness during the subsequent epidemic.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Annual influenza epidemics are associated with serious excess morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVs) have been shown to reduce hospitalization and death following influenza in this vulnerable population, but their efficacy is lower than that observed in younger, healthy populations. In addition, recent studies have questioned the level of effectiveness of TIV in the elderly, suggesting that cohort studies have overestimated the benefits of immunization with current TIV formulations in this age group. In view of these considerations, it is widely accepted that improved and alternative vaccines are needed for control of seasonal and pandemic influenza.

Currently available TIVs are prepared from viruses that are grown in embryonated hens' eggs. Alternative substrates for vaccine production are desirable in order to reduce the vulnerability of and to expand influenza vaccine supply. Recombinant DNA techniques allow for expression of the influenza hemagglutinin (rHA) by baculovirus vectors in insect cell cultures. Advantages of this technique include speed of production, absence of egg protein, and a highly purified product. Previous studies among healthy younger and older adults have confirmed that rHA vaccines are safe, well tolerated and immunogenic at dosages up to nine times higher than those contained in TIV. Dose-related increases in serum antibody levels after immunization also were observed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

870

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Center of Vaccine Development, Univ. of Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21230
        • Passport Health Maryland
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
    • New Jersey
      • Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States, 07702
        • Passport Health New Jersey
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • Rochester Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 15241
        • Primary Physicians Research
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory adults aged 65 and older
  • Medically stable, as determined by oral temperature <100.0°F, medical history, and targeted physical examination based on medical history
  • Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures
  • Provides written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to eggs or other vaccine components.
  • Immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or treatment, or used anticancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 36 months.
  • Any malignancy (excluding nonmelanotic skin cancer or lymphoproliferative disorder), other than localized prostrate cancer, diagnosed or treated actively during the past 5 years. Subjects with any history of lymphoproliferative disorder will be excluded, while subjects with a history of localized nonmelanotic skin cancer may be eligible.
  • Long-term use of oral steroids, parenteral steroids, or high-dose inhaled steroids within the preceding 6 months (Nasal and topical steroids are allowed).
  • Major psychiatric diagnosis including schizophrenia, bipolar disease or other major depression, or any diagnosis of dementia or associated concomitant medications (e.g., Aricept) used for treating dementia
  • History of receiving immunoglobulin or other blood product within the 3 months prior to enrollment in this study.
  • Receipt of any other licensed vaccines within 2 weeks (for inactivated vaccines) or 4 weeks (for live vaccines) prior to enrollment in this study.
  • History of severe reactions following immunization with influenza virus vaccines.
  • Moderate to severe acute illness or febrile illness (oral temperature greater than 100*F) within 1 week prior to vaccination.
  • Receipt of an experimental agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product or medication) within 1 month prior to enrollment in this study, or expects to receive an experimental agent during study period.
  • Known active human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 5 years.
  • History of Guillain-Barré Syndrome.
  • Any acute or chronic medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would render vaccination unsafe, interfere with the evaluation of responses, or render the subject unable to meet the requirements of the protocol. These conditions include, but are not limited to: history of significant renal impairment (dialysis and treatment for kidney disease, including diabetic and hypertensive kidney disease); subjects with diabetes mellitus, well-controlled with oral agents may enroll as long there has been no dosage increase within the past 6 months; insulin-dependent diabetes is excluded; cardiac insufficiency, if heart failure is present (New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV); an arteriosclerotic event during the 6 months prior to enrollment (e.g., history of myocardial infarction, stroke, recanalization of femoral arteries, or transient ischemic attack).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FluBlok

Recombinant Trivalent Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine: 2005-2006 formulation containing 45μg of each hemagglutinin derived from A/New Caledonia (H1N1), A/Wisconsin (H3N2) and B/Ohio

135μg total

0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other Names:
  • Fluzone
  • recombinant hemagglutinin
  • rHA
  • TIV
  • rHA0
  • FluBlok
Active Comparator: TIV (Fluzone)

Licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV): 2005-2006 formulation containing 15μg of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Wisconsin (H3N2), A/New Caledonia (H1N1) and B/Malaysia

45μg total

(Fluzone, sanofi pasteur)

0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other Names:
  • Fluzone
  • recombinant hemagglutinin
  • rHA
  • TIV
  • rHA0
  • FluBlok

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluation of safety and reactogenicity of FluBlok and TIV in medically stable adults 65 years and older.
Time Frame: influenza season
influenza season

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of relative efficacy and effectiveness of FluBlok and TIV in medically stable adults 65 years and older.
Time Frame: influenza season
influenza season
Evaluation and comparison of immunogenicity of FluBlok and TIV in medically stable adults 65 years and older.
Time Frame: influenza season
influenza season

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wendy A. Keitel, MD, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Hana M. El-Sahly, MD, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: John J. Treanor, MD, University of Rochester Medical
  • Principal Investigator: Keith S. Reisinger, MD, Primary Physicians Research
  • Principal Investigator: Gregory A. Poland, MD, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth D. Lessans, MD, Passport Health Maryland
  • Principal Investigator: John J. Minneti, MD, Passport Health New Jersey
  • Principal Investigator: Kristen Lyke, MD, Center of Vaccine Development, University of Maryland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 2, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2009

Last Verified

December 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza

Clinical Trials on Influenza Vaccination

3
Subscribe