Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Intravenous (IV) Catheterization in Children

March 7, 2007 updated by: Norton Healthcare

Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Children

This trial is a comparison of the anesthetic effectiveness of J-Tip needle-free jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to the anesthetic effectiveness of topical 4% ELA-Max for peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) insertion. The researchers hypothesize that the jet injection of lidocaine will provide superior anesthesia to the ELA-Max prior to PIV insertion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A prospective, block-randomized, controlled trial comparing J-Tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to a 30-minute application of 4% ELA-Max for topical anesthesia in children 8-15 years old presenting to a tertiary care pediatric emergency department for PIV insertion. All subjects recorded self-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain at time of enrollment and pain of PIV insertion. Jet injection subjects also recorded pain of jet injection. Subjects were videotaped during jet injection and PIV insertion. Videotapes were reviewed by a single blinded reviewer for observer-reported VAS pain scores for jet injection and PIV insertion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Kosair Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 8-15 years requiring a PIV as part of their management in the emergency department.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excluded from the study if they reported use of analgesic medication within 6 hours of enrollment,
  • Had a Glasgow Coma Score < 15,
  • A baseline screening VAS pain score > 20 mm, or
  • A history of skin hypersensitivity or lidocaine allergy,
  • Were incapable of self-reporting a pain score,
  • Had a known neurological condition that alters pain perception,
  • Had methemoglobinemia, or
  • Did not speak or understand English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
VAS pain scores for the PIV insertion as judged by the patients and the blinded observer.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Secondary outcome measures included patient and blinded observer VAS scores for pain of jet injection, patient and blinded observer scores for anxiety of PIV insertion, nursing satisfaction of placing the PIV with jet injection or ELA-Maxâ, nursing diffi

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: In K Kim, MD, Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kosair Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Study Completion

April 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2007

Last Verified

March 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe