Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment in Combination With Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

April 11, 2019 updated by: Allergan
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal implant of dexamethasone with laser treatment vs. laser treatment alone in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

253

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    • California
      • Artesia, California, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older with diabetic macular edema
  • Decrease in visual acuity in at least one eye as a result of macular edema (20/50 or worse)
  • Visual acuity in other eye no worse than 20/200

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known anticipated need for ocular surgery within next 12 months
  • History of glaucoma or current high eye pressure requiring more than 1 medication
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Known steroid-responder
  • Use of systemic steroids - Use of Warfarin/Heparin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 700 µg Dexamethasone Implant and Laser Photocoagulation
Initial intravitreal injection of 700 µg dexamethasone with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria. Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
Initial intravitreal injection of 700 µg dexamethasone with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria.
Other Names:
  • Posurdex®
Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
Sham Comparator: Sham Implant and Laser Photocoagulation
Initial sham injection with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria. Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
Initial laser photocoagulation with up to 3 additional treatments based on re-treatment criteria.
Initial sham injection with up to 1 additional treatment based on re-treatment criteria.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With at Least 10 Letters of Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.
Baseline, Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly indicates improvement and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly indicates a worsening.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Central subfield retinal thickness is assessed in the study eye by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The central subfield is an area in the retina (back of the eye). OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system that provides high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina from which retinal thickness can be measured. A negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in the Focal Leakage Area in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12
Focal leakage area in the study eye is assessed using fluorescein angiography. A positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening and a negative number change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Month 12
Time to Retreatment in the Study Eye
Time Frame: 12 Months
Time to retreatment in the study eye is defined as the number of days between the initial treatment and re-treatment with the study medication.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Dexamethasone

Subscribe