- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00472043
PDT With Metvix 160 mg/g Cream Versus PDT With Placebo Cream in Participants With Primary Nodular Basal Call Carcinoma
A Multicentre, Phase III, Double Blind Study of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix® 160 mg/g Cream in Comparison to PDT With Placebo Cream in Participants With Primary Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was the selective destruction of abnormal cells through light activation of a photosensitiser in the presence of oxygen. These cells accumulated more photosensitiser than normal cells. The photosensitiser generated reactive oxygen species upon illumination.
For skin diseases, there had been an increasing interest in using precursors of the endogenous photosensitiser protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). The most commonly used precursors had been 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and its derivatives. The present test drug, Metvix®, contained the methyl ester of ALA, which penetrated the lesions well and shows high lesion selectivity .
In vitro studies of animal and human tissues had shown significant intracellular formation of photoactive porphyrins after addition of Metvix®. The increased levels of photoactive porphyrins induced cytotoxic effects in tumour cells after photoactivation.
The primary objective was to compare PDT with Metvix® cream to PDT with placebo cream in terms of participant complete response rates based on histologically verified disappearance of the lesions at 6 months after last treatment cycle.
Secondary objectives were to compare the two treatments in terms of histological and clinical mean participant response weighted by the number of lesions within a participant, lesion response rates across participants, clinical complete participant response, cosmetic outcome and adverse events.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
- Dept. of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
-
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia, 2217
- Dermatology Dept., St. George Hospital
-
Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia, 2170
- Dermatology Centre
-
-
Queensland
-
Benowa, Queensland, Australia, 4217
- Dr. Michael Freeman
-
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
- Dermatology Dept., Princess Alexandra Hospital
-
-
Victoria
-
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia, 3065
- Department of Dermatology, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
-
-
Western Australia
-
Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia, 6160
- Fremantle Dermatology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
A participant with primary, nodular BCC lesion(s) suitable for entry is defined as a participant with
- Clinically diagnosed primary nodular BCC lesion(s).
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of BCC.
- BCC lesions suitable for simple excision surgery.
- Males or females above 18 years of age.
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
A participant that is ineligible for inclusion is a participant fulfilling any of the following criteria:
- Participants with porphyria.
- Participant with Gorlin's syndrome.
- Participant with Xeroderma pigmentosum.
- Participants concurrently receiving immunosuppressive medication.
- Participants with a history of arsenic exposure.
- Known allergy to Metvix®, a similar PDT compound or excipients of the cream.
- Participation in other clinical studies either concurrently or within the last 30 days.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding: All women of child-bearing potential must use adequate contraception (e.g. barrier methods, oral contraceptives or intrauterine device) during the treatment period and one month thereafter. In addition, they must have a negative pregnancy test prior to treatment.
- Conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.
Lesion Exclusion Criteria:
- A nodular BCC lesion in periorbital area, ears and nasolabial fold.
- A nodular BCC lesion with the longest diameter less than 6 mm or larger than 15 mm in face/scalp, larger than 20 mm on extremities and neck and larger than 30 mm on truncus.
- Pigmented nodular BCC lesion(s).
- Morpheaform nodular BCC lesion(s).
- Infiltrating nodular BCC lesion(s).
- Prior treatment of the BCC lesion(s).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Metvix® cream 160 milligram per gram
Methyl aminolevulinate hydrochloride 160 milligram (mg)/gram (g) cream were received by participants with primary nodular basal cell carcinoma.
A thick layer of study cream was applied directly on the lesion and on 5 mm of the surrounding tissue.
An approximately 1 mm thick layer of cream was applied to cover the lesion completely.
The study cream was applied for at least 3 hours followed by illumination using non-coherent red (570-670 nm) light at a fluence of 50- 75 J/cm^2.
|
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants with primary nodular basal cell carcinoma received Metvix® matching placebo cream.
A thick layer of study cream was applied directly on the lesion and on 5 mm of the surrounding tissue.
An approximately 1 mm thick layer of cream was applied to cover the lesion completely.
The study cream was applied for at least 3 hours followed by illumination using non-coherent red (570-670 nm) light at a fluence of 50- 75 J/cm^2.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Histologically Confirmed Complete Response (CR)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Complete Response (CR) was defined as 100 percentage of the lesions within the participant having negative findings for nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the histological examination.
Histological examination included evaluation of all the microscopical slides from the excised tissue for presence of malignant basal cells.
Complete response was defined as complete disappearance of lesion.
Percentage of participants with histologically confirmed complete response were reported.
|
up to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Lesions Per Participant: Histologically Confirmed Participant Weighted Response
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Histological response weight means no signs of malignant basal cells in all microscopical slides containing excised tissue.
The histologically confirmed participant weighted response, weighted by percentage of lesions per participant are reported in this outcome measure.
Number of lesions per participant with-in treatment group were calculated in following way: ni = number of lesions within 1 participant, ci= number of lesions in complete response within 1 participant, xi= 100%.
ci/ni= response rate within one participant, Nt= number of participant within one treatment, nt=number of lesions with-in one treatment, wi=ni/nt= weight for one participant with Nt Σ wi (i=1) = 1 for each treatment.
|
Up to 3 months
|
|
Histological Lesion Response
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Histological examination included from the excised tissue were examined for presence of malignant basal cells, where complete response (CR) was no signs of malignant basal cells and non-CR was evidence of malignant basal cells
|
Up to 3 months
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Confirmed Participant Complete Response (CR)
Time Frame: Up to 9 months
|
A CR to treatment was documented clinically by visual evaluation and palpation.
The on-site investigator evaluated the lesion response by comparing with the lesion size before treatment using the following definitions: CR - complete disappearance of a lesion.
Partial response (PR) -the longest diameter of the lesion is reduced by 50% or more.
No response (NR) - the longest diameter of the lesion is less than 50% reduced.
Progression - the longest diameter is increased by 20% or more.
|
Up to 9 months
|
|
Cosmetic Outcomes for Lesions Assessed by Investigator
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Cosmetic outcome for those lesions with complete histological response was assessed by both the investigator and by the participant.
Cosmetic outcome was assessed with regards to occurrence of the following signs or symptoms like scarring, atrophy, induration, redness, and change in pigmentation.
The cosmetic outcome was graded as excellent: no scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin; good: no scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin; fair: slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration; poor: extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration.
|
Up to 3 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Cosmetic Outcomes for Lesions Assessed by Participants
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Cosmetic outcome for those lesions with complete histological response was assessed by both the investigator and by the participant.
Cosmetic outcome was assessed with regards to occurrence of the following signs or symptoms like scarring, atrophy, induration, redness, and change in pigmentation.
The cosmetic outcome was graded as excellent: no scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin; good: no scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin; fair: slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration; poor: extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration.
|
Up to 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter Foley, MD, Department of Dermatology, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PC T308/00
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.