Prospective, Randomised, Single-Blinded, Monocentric Clinical Study to Compare Postoperative Analgesia and Outcome After Combined Paravertebral and Intrathecal Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracotomy

February 12, 2009 updated by: University Hospital Freiburg
The purpose of this study is to compare whether epidural analgesia would provide equal analgesia than combining intrathecal opioids with thoracic paravertebral local anesthetics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thoracotomy is an invasive surgical procedure, which is mainly performed in patients with pre-existing lung disease such as lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pain after thoracotomy is considered the most intense acute postoperative pain, adversely affecting the ability to cough, deep breathing, and lung function, resulting in respiratory complications and delayed recovery. The adverse effects can be further aggravated by occurrence of chronic post-thoracotomy pain.

Thoracic epidural analgesia is often recommended as the gold standard for the relief of acute post-thoracotomy pain. Thoracic paravertebral blockade or intrathecal opioid analgesia has also been shown to be efficacious for pain relief. Since there is no ideal single regional technique for pain relief after thoracotomy an alternative method maybe the combination of low-dose intrathecal morphine and sufentanil plus continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia with local anesthetics.

We therefore hypothesized that combining intrathecal sufentanil and morphine with thoracic paravertebral applicated ropivacaine would provide equal analgesia compared to thoracic epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil. We further speculate that this new regimen would have a lower incidence of typical side effects due to TEA, such as block failure, hypotension or urinary retention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Freiburg, Germany, D-79106
        • Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sex: male/female
  • Age: 18 - 75 years
  • Informed consent of the patient
  • Elective thoracotomy
  • Two chest drains

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications against the use of regional techniques: known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Infection around the puncture site
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Drug abuse
  • Emergency surgery
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
thoracic epidural analgesia
Active Comparator: 2
intrathecal opioids and thoracic paravertebral analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome measures used are pain at rest, at coughing, and on movement at each time point, as reported by the patient using a standard Visual Analogue Score (VAS).
Time Frame: within the first three days
within the first three days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
incidence of side-effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation score, respiratory depression, hypotension, pruritus, urinary retention), total number of doses of piritramide administered, patient satisfaction, and incidence of chronic pain.
Time Frame: within one year
within one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Torsten Loop, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center, Hugstetterstrasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany,
  • Principal Investigator: Sebastian Dango, M.D., Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center, Hugstetterstrasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany,

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2009

Last Verified

February 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe