A Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety in UK Laboratory Workers of Menitorix

March 20, 2019 updated by: Public Health England

A Phase IV, Single Group Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety in UK Laboratory Workers of a Licensed Hib and Meningococcal C Conjugate Combined Vaccine (Menitorix)

Menitorix is a combined Hib conjugate and meningococcal C conjugate vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline. It is currently licensed and recommended as a booster vaccination for UK children in the second year of life.

It is important that staff who have a potential occupational exposure to infectious disease are afforded protection where possible. The licensure and availability of Menitorix provides the opportunity to vaccinate such staff.

Immune responses that are indicative of protection have been established for both Hib and meningococcal C disease. It is therefore proposed that the immune responses of those laboratory staff taking part be measured as data currently available following Menitorix vaccination is in naïve children and adults. This study will also allow us to provide occupational healthcare to laboratory workers.

Participation in the study would be offered to all those staff considered to be at occupational health risk of Hib or meningococcal C disease at the Manchester HPA site. This will be a single group study in that everyone enrolled will receive a single dose of Menitorix and will have blood collected prior to and 4-6 weeks following vaccination.

Assessment of whether protective levels of antibody have been achieved will be made using the blood sample taken 4-6 weeks after vaccination. Extra dose(s) will be offered to any subjects whose levels are not considered to confer protection as described later in this protocol. Subjects receiving and extra vaccination will be offered and a further blood test 4-6 weeks later to allow antibody levels to be checked again.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Menitorix is a combined Hib conjugate and meningococcal C conjugate vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline. It is currently licensed and recommended as a booster vaccination for UK children in the second year of life.

It is important that staff who have a potential occupational exposure to infectious disease are afforded protection where possible [HPA Occupational Health Policy [Appendix 1]; HSE Safe working and the prevention of infection in clinical laboratories and similar facilities, 2003]. The licensure and availability of Menitorix provides the opportunity to vaccinate such staff.

Immune responses that are indicative of protection have been established for both Hib and meningococcal C disease [Andrews et al., 2003; Kayhty et al., 1983]. It is therefore proposed that the immune responses of those laboratory staff taking part be measured as data currently available following Menitorix vaccination is in naïve children and adults [Tejedor et al., 2006a and b; Carmona et al., 2006; Habermehl et al., 2006; Pace et al., 2006]. This study will also allow us to provide occupational healthcare to laboratory workers.

Laboratory staff at Manchester have not received a Hib vaccine although they have received a number of meningococcal vaccines with the majority having received their meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine in 1999. Certain staff would have received bivalent meningococcal A and C prior to the conjugate vaccine which has recently been demonstrated to hinder the induction of immunological memory by the conjugate vaccine [Vu et al., 2006]. Following the conjugate vaccine many staff have since received a quadrivalent A/C/Y/W135 polysaccharide vaccine in the following seven years, but little is known about the duration of protection in this age group.

Receiving a polysaccharide vaccine following a conjugate does induce an elevated antibody response but it is known that polysaccharide vaccination does not generate memory B cells and can result in the loss of the ability to mount subsequent memory antibody responses, as was observed by MacLennan et al. for Neisseria meningitidis group C anticapsular antibody responses [MacLennan et al., 2001]. The clinical importance of loss of immunological memory or induction of antibody hyporesponsiveness, is unknown. However, in addition to dampening antibody responses to a subsequent immunisation, a delay or impaired serum antibody response upon encountering an encapsulated pathogen could theoretically increase susceptibility to developing disease. Such a mechanism may explain the higher rate of otitis media observed after administration of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine to Dutch children primed with a 7-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide protein conjugate vaccine as compared with the rate in controls given hepatitis B vaccine (P=0.0001) [Veenhoven et al., 2003]. In contrast, during the six months between the conjugate vaccination and booster there was a trend in favor of fewer episodes of otitis in the pneumococcal-vaccinated group.

It appears that staff will benefit from both the Hib and serogroup C conjugate vaccinations.

Assessments in this study:

Participation in the study would be offered to all those staff considered to be at occupational health risk of Hib or meningococcal C disease at the Manchester HPA site. The maximum number of participants would therefore be 30. This will be a single group study in that everyone enrolled will receive a single dose of Menitorix and will have blood collected prior to and 4-6 weeks following vaccination.

Local anaesthetic cream will be offered to minimise discomfort of the blood tests and fully trained staff will carry out all procedures.

Assessment of whether protective levels of antibody have been achieved will be made using the blood sample taken 4-6 weeks after vaccination. Extra dose(s) will be offered to any subjects whose levels are not considered to confer protection as described later in this protocol. Subjects receiving and extra vaccination will be offered and a further blood test 4-6 weeks later to allow antibody levels to be checked again.

Samples will be sent to collaborating laboratories of the National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium for assessment of responses to vaccinations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WZ
        • Health Protection Agency, Manchester Laboratory.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No contraindications to vaccination as specified in the "Green Book" - Immunisation Against Infectious Disease, HMSO.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine serum bactericidal antibody levels against Neisseria meningitis serogroup C.
Time Frame: 1 month after vaccination
1 month after vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine anti-Hib IgG concentration (ELISA)
Time Frame: 1 month after vaccination
1 month after vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ed Kaczmarski, MBBS, Public Health England

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • StaMen

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe