Crystalloids Versus Colloids During Surgery (CC)

January 8, 2018 updated by: Barbara Kabon, Medical University of Vienna

A Comparison of Crystalloids vs. Colloids for Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Management

The purpose of the study is to test whether colloid-based goal-directed intraoperative fluid management leads to less perioperative morbidity compared to crystalloid-based goal-directed intraoperative fluid management. Goal-directed therapy is based on measurements by an Esophageal Doppler Device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For a long time there is a raging debate whether crystalloid solutions or colloid solutions are better suited for fluid therapy. Early proponents both for crystalloids [Shires 1961] and colloids [Shoemaker 1979] deserve credit for elucidating important facts about volume replacement therapy - without answering the primary question. Elaborate reviews comparing crystalloid and colloid therapy for critically ill patients have been performed in the late nineties and updated recently [Roberts 2004]. However, it has been suggested that both questions and answers of reviews leave us none but wiser [Webb 1999]. Although a plethora of studies comparing crystalloid vs. colloid therapy in the last decades have been published, volume replacement therapy is still considered to be based on dogma and personal beliefs [Boldt 2003].

Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy monitored by Esophageal Doppler identifies volume-responders, thereby decreasing length of stay in hospital in orthopedic [Sinclair 1997], cardiac [Mythen 1995], and abdominal surgery patients [Gan 2002, Wakeling 2005, Noblett 2006]. However, all these studies have been performed with a colloid to be the substance applied. Thus, it has been questioned whether monitoring with the Esophageal Doppler monitor, or the application of additional colloid improved outcome [Horowitz, Kumar 2003].

Consequently, the researchers will use Esophageal Doppler Monitoring for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy to compare the effects of crystalloid vs. colloid therapy on various organ systems, assessing combined perioperative morbidity [Bennett-Guerrero 1999] .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1109

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • After written informed consent patients undergoing elective open colon surgery, or open hysterectomy or myomectomy, or spine surgery or hip replacement will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having severe cardiac or renal insufficiency
  • Patients with severe coronary artery disease
  • Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with severe COPD
  • Patients with symptoms of infections or sepsis
  • Patients with allergy to hydroxyethylstarch.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Arm Nr 1: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Lactated Ringer's Solution will be administered.
Arm Nr 1: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Lactated Ringer's Solution will be administered.
Active Comparator: 2
Arm Nr 2: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Hydroxyethylstarch 6% 130/0.4 will be administered.
Arm Nr 2: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Hydroxyethylstarch 6% 130/0.4 will be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
combined perioperative morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Tissue oxygenation, Wound Infection, Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain, pulmonary function,
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coagulation (ROTEM)
Time Frame: intraop, postop day1
in a subgroup of 50 patients undergoing hepatic resection ROTEM measurements will be performed intraoperatively, postoperatively and on the first postoperative morning and compared between the groups.
intraop, postop day1
Inflammatory response attenuation by HES 130/0.4
Time Frame: 4 postoperative days

In a subgroups of 120 patients the postoperative immune function will be evaluated and compared between crystalloids and colloids.

The immunological parameters include:

IL6, IL-8, IL-10, Procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, HLA-DR Expression, CRP C-reactive protein, leucocytes, TNF alpha Blood samples will be collected immediately before surgery (T0) for baseline measurement, immediately after surgery finish (T1), and on postoperative day one, two and four (T2, T3 and T4).

4 postoperative days
Body Composition Monitor Measurement (BCM)
Time Frame: pre and postoperatively

In a subgroup of 100 patients overhydration will be evaluated pre- and immediately postoperatively with a body composition monitor (BCM), a whole-body bioimpedance spectroscopy device manufactured and distributed by Fresenius Medical Care, Germany.

Measurements will be compared betwwen the groups

pre and postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edith Fleischmann, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on Lactated Ringer's Solution

Subscribe