- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT00517127
Crystalloids Versus Colloids During Surgery (CC)
A Comparison of Crystalloids vs. Colloids for Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Management
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
For a long time there is a raging debate whether crystalloid solutions or colloid solutions are better suited for fluid therapy. Early proponents both for crystalloids [Shires 1961] and colloids [Shoemaker 1979] deserve credit for elucidating important facts about volume replacement therapy - without answering the primary question. Elaborate reviews comparing crystalloid and colloid therapy for critically ill patients have been performed in the late nineties and updated recently [Roberts 2004]. However, it has been suggested that both questions and answers of reviews leave us none but wiser [Webb 1999]. Although a plethora of studies comparing crystalloid vs. colloid therapy in the last decades have been published, volume replacement therapy is still considered to be based on dogma and personal beliefs [Boldt 2003].
Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy monitored by Esophageal Doppler identifies volume-responders, thereby decreasing length of stay in hospital in orthopedic [Sinclair 1997], cardiac [Mythen 1995], and abdominal surgery patients [Gan 2002, Wakeling 2005, Noblett 2006]. However, all these studies have been performed with a colloid to be the substance applied. Thus, it has been questioned whether monitoring with the Esophageal Doppler monitor, or the application of additional colloid improved outcome [Horowitz, Kumar 2003].
Consequently, the researchers will use Esophageal Doppler Monitoring for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy to compare the effects of crystalloid vs. colloid therapy on various organ systems, assessing combined perioperative morbidity [Bennett-Guerrero 1999] .
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Fase 4
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Vienna, Áustria, 1090
- Medical University of Vienna
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- After written informed consent patients undergoing elective open colon surgery, or open hysterectomy or myomectomy, or spine surgery or hip replacement will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients having severe cardiac or renal insufficiency
- Patients with severe coronary artery disease
- Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
- Patients with severe COPD
- Patients with symptoms of infections or sepsis
- Patients with allergy to hydroxyethylstarch.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Quadruplicar
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: 1
Arm Nr 1: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Lactated Ringer's Solution will be administered.
|
Arm Nr 1: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Lactated Ringer's Solution will be administered.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: 2
Arm Nr 2: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Hydroxyethylstarch 6% 130/0.4 will be administered.
|
Arm Nr 2: If corrected flow time (fTc), measured by esophageal doppler, falls below 350 msec, 250 ml of Hydroxyethylstarch 6% 130/0.4 will be administered.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Prazo |
|---|---|
|
combined perioperative morbidity
Prazo: 30 days after surgery
|
30 days after surgery
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Prazo |
|---|---|
|
Tissue oxygenation, Wound Infection, Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain, pulmonary function,
Prazo: 30 days after surgery
|
30 days after surgery
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Coagulation (ROTEM)
Prazo: intraop, postop day1
|
in a subgroup of 50 patients undergoing hepatic resection ROTEM measurements will be performed intraoperatively, postoperatively and on the first postoperative morning and compared between the groups.
|
intraop, postop day1
|
|
Inflammatory response attenuation by HES 130/0.4
Prazo: 4 postoperative days
|
In a subgroups of 120 patients the postoperative immune function will be evaluated and compared between crystalloids and colloids. The immunological parameters include: IL6, IL-8, IL-10, Procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, HLA-DR Expression, CRP C-reactive protein, leucocytes, TNF alpha Blood samples will be collected immediately before surgery (T0) for baseline measurement, immediately after surgery finish (T1), and on postoperative day one, two and four (T2, T3 and T4). |
4 postoperative days
|
|
Body Composition Monitor Measurement (BCM)
Prazo: pre and postoperatively
|
In a subgroup of 100 patients overhydration will be evaluated pre- and immediately postoperatively with a body composition monitor (BCM), a whole-body bioimpedance spectroscopy device manufactured and distributed by Fresenius Medical Care, Germany. Measurements will be compared betwwen the groups |
pre and postoperatively
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Edith Fleischmann, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Bennett-Guerrero E, Welsby I, Dunn TJ, Young LR, Wahl TA, Diers TL, Phillips-Bute BG, Newman MF, Mythen MG. The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999 Aug;89(2):514-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00050.
- SHIRES T, WILLIAMS J, BROWN F. Acute change in extracellular fluids associated with major surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 1961 Nov;154(5):803-10. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196111000-00005. No abstract available.
- Shoemaker WC, Hauser CJ. Critique of crystalloid versus colloid therapy in shock and shock lung. Crit Care Med. 1979 Mar;7(3):117-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-197903000-00007. No abstract available.
- Roberts I, Alderson P, Bunn F, Chinnock P, Ker K, Schierhout G. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD000567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub2.
- Webb AR. Crystalloid or colloid for resuscitation. Are we any the wiser? Crit Care. 1999;3(3):R25-R28. doi: 10.1186/cc346. No abstract available.
- Boldt J. New light on intravascular volume replacement regimens: what did we learn from the past three years? Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1595-1604. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000089961.15975.78.
- Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):909-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.909.
- Mythen MG, Webb AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg. 1995 Apr;130(4):423-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040085019.
- Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002 Oct;97(4):820-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012.
- Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, Woods WG, Miles WF, Barclay GR, Fleming SC. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):634-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei223. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
- Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1069-76. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5454.
- Horowitz PE, Kumar A. It's the colloid, not the esophageal Doppler monitor. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jul;99(1):238-9; author reply 239. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200307000-00045. No abstract available.
- Obradovic M, Kurz A, Kabon B, Roth G, Kimberger O, Zotti O, Bayoumi A, Reiterer C, Stift A, Fleischmann E. The effect of intraoperative goal-directed crystalloid versus colloid administration on perioperative inflammatory markers - a substudy of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 21;20(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01126-3.
- Reiterer C, Kabon B, Zotti O, Obradovic M, Kurz A, Fleischmann E. Effect of goal-directed crystalloid- versus colloid-based fluid strategy on tissue oxygen tension: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):768-776. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 431/2005
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .