Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Diabetic Fibrovascular Proliferation With and Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

November 8, 2007 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital
Internal limiting membrane peeling in diabetic vitrectomy will help prevent postoperative epiretinal membrane formation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Progressive fibrovascular proliferation may occur despite appropriate panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic patients. Fibrovascular proliferation may lead to persistent or recurrent vitreous hemorrhage, macular traction, or traction macular detachment, and becomes a major indication for vitrectomy.1 During the past 25 years, anatomical and visual results of vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy have improved as a result of improved understanding of the pathoanatomy and improvements in surgical instrumentation.2-5 Although anatomical success is high after complete vitrectomy, recurrent epiretinal membrane may cause macular thickening, cysts formation, preventing good functional outcome.6 An epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a non-vascular cellular membrane that may cause symptomatic visual disturbances due to retinal wrinkling and distortion.7 These epiretinal membranes have been found to be composed of fibroblasts, glial cells, macrophages, myofiboblasts, nad retinal pigment epithelial cells.8-9 Studies have suggested removal of internal limiting membrane (ILM) may decrease the likelihood of post-operative ERM formation in cases of diabetic macular edema and idiopathic ERM. It is postulated that removal of the ILM removes the scaffold upon which myofibroblasts would proliferate.10 Efficacy of vitrectomy including removal of ILM was mostly described as facilitating resolution of diffuse diabetic macular edema11 and improvement of visual acuity or in macular hole surgery in diabetic patients.12However, it is unknown if removal of ILM during vitreoretinal surgery in diabetic patients with active fibrovascular proliferation is useful in preventing postoperative ERM formation. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation and visual outcome in diabetic patients with active fibrovascular proliferation who underwent vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

28 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • active fibrovascular proliferation with or without tractional detachment
  • previous pan-retinal photocoagulation at least 3 months before

Exclusion Criteria:

  • biomicroscopic evidence of macular hole
  • combination of tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  • location of fibrovascular proliferation anterior to the equator
  • major ocular surgery history(including, scleral buckle, glaucoma filter, cornea transplant, vitreoretinal surgery etc
  • the presence of other ocular conditions such as glaucoma, uveitis, or other ocular inflammatory diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2
ILM maculorhexis is initiated using scraper and completed using a 25-gauge Synergetics (St. Louis, MO) forceps.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Snellen BCVA and epiretinal membrane formation measured with OCT
Time Frame: within 6 months after the surgery
within 6 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
central macular thickness measured bt OCT
Time Frame: within 6 months after the surgery
within 6 months after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chung-may Yang, M.D., National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2007

Last Verified

April 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Who Have Active Fibrovascular Proliferation

Clinical Trials on ILM peeling

3
Subscribe