Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Calcaneus Fractures With and Without Bone Graft (CALCANEUS)

September 28, 2013 updated by: University of Alabama at Birmingham

Prospective Comparison of Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Calcaneus Fractures With and Without Tricortical Iliac Crest Bone Grafting

The purpose of this study is to compare patient functional outcomes for surgical fixation of calcaneus fractures with and without tricortical iliac crest bone grafting

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed as a randomized, prospective evaluation of patients who have sustained an intra-articular calcaneus fracture that requires open reduction with internal fixation as the preferred method of treatment. Patients who desire to participate in this study will be randomized into one of two groups. Group A will be made up of patients that undergo open reduction with internal fixation and Tricortical iliac crest bone grafting. Group B will consist of patients that undergo open reduction with internal fixation without bone grafting. All other surgical techniques and management of the fracture and patient will remain unchanged.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Orthopaedic Trauma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • intra-articular calcaneus fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation
  • Adult patient (19 years or older)
  • Mental capacity to comply with post-operative regimen, evaluation and data collection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-operative fractures for primary or secondary reasons
  • prior surgery to the hindfoot of the involved lower extremity
  • inability to comply with post-operative regimen, evaluation and data collection
  • inability or unwillingness to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ORIF with Bone Grafting
This study will be designed as a randomized, prospective, blinded evaluation of patients who have sustained an intra-articular calcaneous fracture that would require open reduction with internal fixation as the preferred method of treatment. Group A will be made up of patients that undergo ORIF and Tricortical iliac crest bone grafting.
The calcaneus fracture will be surgically repaired with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and Tricortical Iliac Crest bone grafting
Active Comparator: ORIF without Bone Grafting
This study will be designed as a randomized, prospective, blinded evaluation of patients who have sustained an intra-articular calcaneous fracture that would require open reduction with internal fixation as the preferred method of treatment. Group B will consist of patients that undergo open reduction with internal fixation without bone grafting
The calcaneus fracture will be surgically repaired with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (no bone grafting)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Union and healing of Calcaneus Fracture
Time Frame: 3 month to 12 month healing period
3 month to 12 month healing period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rena L Stewart, MD, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2000

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • F990923008

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe