Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx(R)) as Monotherapy in Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer (Study P05059)

May 15, 2017 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Caelyx(R) in Breast Cancer in the Elderly. Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx(R)) as Monotherapy in Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in elderly patients who are to receive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer, not amenable to surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients meeting the following criteria will be eligible for enrollment.

    • Female patients with histologic or cytologic diagnosis of breast cancer that is locally advanced or metastatic, and not amenable to surgery.
    • Age >= 65 years.
    • World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status 0 - 2
    • Measurable disease in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Patients with bone metastasis can also be included but will be evaluated according to WHO criteria. Patients with non-measurable disease can also be included.
    • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >= 50% verified by ultrasound cardiography (UCG); no clinical signs of heart disease.
    • Normal organ function, except due to disease involvement, however maximum deviation:

      • S-creatinine <= 1.5 x upper normal limit;
      • Bilirubin <= 2 x upper normal limit;
      • Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) <= 3 x upper normal limit. In case of liver metastases, ALAT and/or ASAT <= 5 x upper normal limit.
    • Adequate bone marrow function, ie:

      • Platelets >= 100 x 10^9/L;
      • Neutrophils >= 1.5 x 10^9/L;
      • White Blood Cell (WBC) >= 3.0 x 10^9/L;
      • Hemoglobin > 90 g/L.
    • Life expectancy >= 12 weeks.
    • Patients having received oral and written information and having provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will not be enrolled if any of the following conditions apply.

    • Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. (The patient may have received previous endocrine therapy or single-drug Herceptin. Intrapleural or intrapericardial Novantrone is allowed.)
    • Recurrence <= 12 months after adjuvant anthracycline-containing treatment and/or prior doxorubicin > 300 mg/m^2 or epirubicin > 540 mg/m^2.
    • Myocardial infarction within 6 months of planned inclusion.
    • Symptomatic brain metastases.
    • Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) positivity eligible for treatment with trastuzumab, or estrogen receptor (ER) positivity eligible for hormonal therapy.
    • Allergy to anthracyclines.
    • Uncontrolled infection.
    • Other not radically treated malignancy.
    • Other disease or condition contraindicating treatment or not allowing follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Caelyx
Caelyx will be administered intravenously at a dose of 40 mg/m^2 on day one every 4 weeks until progression, or unacceptable toxicity, or other reason to discontinue the study treatment. The drug is diluted in 250 ml glucose 5% (500 ml for doses >=90 mg).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Treatment Failure (Defined as Progression of Disease [According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria] or Unacceptable Toxicity Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment or Death).
Time Frame: Time of treatment until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity leading to discontinuation of treatment or death, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Treatment failure was defined as progression of disease (according to the RECIST or WHO criteria) or unacceptable toxicity leading to discontinuation of treatment or death. Progressive Disease according to RECIST response criteria: >=20% increase in the sum of the Longest Diameter of target lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Appearance of new lesions will also constitute progressive disease. Progressive Disease according to WHO response criteria: Increase in size of existing lesions or appearance of new lesions.
Time of treatment until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity leading to discontinuation of treatment or death, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD) as Best Response
Time Frame: Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Response was calculated according to RECIST criteria except for bone metastasis where WHO criteria was used. For patients with skeletal disease only, WHO criteria was used. For patients with measurable disease according to RECIST as well as bone metastasis, both RECIST & WHO were used.

RECIST response criteria for SD required steady state of response of at least 9 weeks duration. There may be no appearance of new lesions.

WHO response criteria for SD required no significant change for at least 8 weeks.

Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Number of Patients With Partial Response (PR) as Best Response
Time Frame: Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Response was calculated according to RECIST criteria except for bone metastasis where WHO criteria was used. For patients with skeletal disease only, WHO criteria was used. For patients with measurable disease according to RECIST as well as bone metastasis, both RECIST & WHO were used.

RECIST PR criteria required >=30% decrease in certain target lesions & no increase in size of non-target lesions or appearance of new lesions

WHO PR criteria required partial decrease in size of lytic lesions, recalcification of lytic lesions, or decreased density of blastic lesions for >=4 wks

Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Number of Patients With Progressive Disease (PD) as Best Response
Time Frame: Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Response was calculated according to RECIST criteria except for bone metastasis where WHO criteria was used. For patients with skeletal disease only, WHO criteria was used. For patients with measurable disease according to RECIST as well as bone metastasis, both RECIST & WHO were used.

RECIST PD criteria required >=20% increase in certain target lesions OR progression of non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions

WHO PD criteria required increase in size of existing lesions or appearance of new lesions.

Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Number of Patients Requiring Dose Reduction
Time Frame: Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
The protocol contains instructions to reduce the Caelyx dose according to specific schedules, in cases necessary due to reasons such as hematological toxicity, non-hematological toxicity, cardiotoxicity, or other toxic side-effects of treatment reducing quality of life etc.
Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Time to Response
Time Frame: Time of treatment until response, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Response can be partial (>=30% decrease in the sum of Longest Diameter of target lesions, determined by two observations not less than 4 weeks apart; no unequivocal increase in the size of non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions may occur) or complete (disappearance of all clinical evidence of tumor determined by 2 observations not less than 4 weeks apart), whichever status is recorded first.
Time of treatment until response, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Duration of response is defined as the time span from the first evaluation that shows response until the first evaluation that shows progression. Where patients did not show progress, duration of response was measured from the first evaluation that showed response until they discontinued the study.

Response can be partial or complete (as previously defined), whichever status is recorded first.

Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Time to Progression
Time Frame: Time of treatment until progression, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Progression is defined as the first evaluation that shows progression (either by RECIST or WHO criteria):

Progressive Disease according to RECIST response criteria: >=20% increase in the sum of the Longest Diameter of target lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Appearance of new lesions will also constitute progressive disease.

Progressive Disease according to WHO response criteria: Increase in size of existing lesions or appearance of new lesions.

Time of treatment until progression, assessed every 12th week until end of treatment (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
Duration of Overall Survival
Time Frame: Time of treatment until death, up to the time that all participants ended treatment
Patients were followed with regards to survival even after they left the trial (ie after End of Treatment visit). Deaths that occurred after patient participation ended were collected all the way through to the overall end of the trial which took place on Oct 31, 2009. These deaths were used to calculate overall survival.
Time of treatment until death, up to the time that all participants ended treatment
Number of Days the Patients Were Hospitalized for Cancer-related Symptoms or Toxicity of Treatment
Time Frame: Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).
The cumulative sum of hospitalization days during the study, per patient. Some patients had multiple hospitalizations.
Time of treatment until treatment discontinuation (study planned to continue until all participants ended treatment).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 7, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 30, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/Merck%20Procedure%20on%20Clinical%20Trial%20Data%20Access%20Final_Updated%20July_9_2014.pdf

http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe