Pre-surgical Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) Using Radiolabeled G250-Antibody

September 3, 2018 updated by: Heidelberg Pharma AG

A Comparative Study of PET/CT Versus Diagnostic CT for the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Pre-surgical Patients With Renal Masses Using Iodine-124 Labeled Chimeric G250 (124I-cG250)

This is a multicenter Phase III study to demonstrate the diagnostic utility of 124I-cG250 PET/CT pre-surgical imaging in patients with operable renal masses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A preoperative 124I-cG250 PET scan may distinguish between clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma in patients with renal masses. Studies of imaging characteristics of 124I by a variety of PET cameras, quantification of tumor uptake of 124I-labeled antibody and correlation with biopsy measurement of tumor and normal tissue have met with encouraging results. As clear cell renal cancers are associated with an aggressive phenotype their a priori determination may help guide appropriate surgical/therapeutic management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

226

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1721
        • David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Clinic
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0330
        • University of Michigan
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89135
        • Nevada Cancer Institute
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • UNC School of Medicine-Chapel Hill
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27711
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-4283
        • Fox Chase Cancer Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-4283
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009
        • MD Anderson

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is over 18 years of age.
  • Presence of a renal mass.
  • Scheduled for surgical resection of renal mass (partial or total nephrectomy, open or laparoscopic technique).
  • Expected survival of at least 3 months.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < 2.
  • The following laboratory results should be within the following limits within the last 2 weeks prior to study day 1:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
    • Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
    • Serum bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
    • Aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) ≤ 2.5 x ULN
    • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x ULN
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL (calculated creatinine clearance >45 ml/min)
  • Negative serum pregnancy test; to be performed on female patients of childbearing potential within 24 hours prior to receiving investigational product. All females of childbearing potential must indicate intent to avoid pregnancy and must use an accepted, effective method of contraception for the duration of the study.
  • Recovered from toxicity of any prior therapy.
  • Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastasis of primary tumor other than Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).
  • Prior history of malignancy within the last 5 years.
  • Prior exposure to murine proteins or chimeric antibodies.
  • Intercurrent medical condition that may limit the amount of antibody to be administered.
  • Intercurrent medical condition that renders the patient ineligible for surgery.
  • New York Heart Association Class III/IV cardiac disease.
  • History of autoimmune hepatitis.
  • Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks prior to 124I-cG250 infusion on day 1.
  • Mental impairment that may compromise the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Lack of availability for immunological and clinical follow-up assessments.
  • Participation in any other clinical trial involving another investigational product within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Allergy to iodine, hyperthyroidism, or Grave's Disease.
  • Known allergic reaction to human serum albumin.
  • Contraindication for contrast-enhanced CT or PET/CT.
  • Contraindication to potassium iodide intake (see package insert).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)
Single arm study, comparing 124I cG250 PET/CT and CT. Each patient underwent a PET/CT and CT scan days (+/-2days) after receipt of 124I cG250.
i.v. and PET/CT scan 4+/-2 days after administration
Other Names:
  • Ca9-SCAN
contrast enhanced CT scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and Specificity of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Versus Diagnostic CT.
Time Frame: 6 months

Average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality on the proportion of participants that were correctly identified on the 124I-cG250 PET/CT Images of having (sensitivity) or not having (specificity) clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) compared to CT images.

Histopathology provided the standard-of-truth because it is the only definitive method for accurately identifying ccRCC.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Imaging Versus Diagnostic CT Imaging
Time Frame: 6 months
The Accuracy is the proportion of participants with correct determinations of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
6 months
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) reflects the Proportion of positive results that are true positive. The PPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
6 months
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Time Frame: 6 months
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) reflects the proportion of negative results that are true negatives. The NPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chaitanya Divgi, MD, UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe