Study of Urgent PC Versus Sham Effectiveness in Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms (SUmiT)

April 13, 2012 updated by: Uroplasty, Inc
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate superiority of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy compared to sham therapy for the treatment of patients with overall bladder (OAB) symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

220

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Chico, California, United States, 95928
        • Gregory L. Davis, M.D., FACOG, Inc.
    • Connecticut
      • Greenwich, Connecticut, United States, 06830
        • Greenwich Urological Associates, P.C.
    • Florida
      • Naples, Florida, United States, 34102
        • Specialists in Urology
    • Michigan
      • Muskegon, Michigan, United States, 49444
        • Mercy Health Partners at the Lakes
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48703
        • Beaumont Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Grand Rapids, Minnesota, United States, 49503
        • Grand Rapids Women's Health DBA Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology Institue of Michigan
      • Minnetonka, Minnesota, United States, 55343
        • Uroplasty, Inc
      • Royal Oak, Minnesota, United States, 48073
        • Beaumont Hospital
    • Nebraska
      • Fremont, Nebraska, United States, 68025
        • Urology Health Center, PC
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Capital Region Urological Surgeons, PLLC
      • White Plains, New York, United States, 10604
        • Central Missouri Women's Healthcare, LLC
    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27403
        • Alliance Urology Specialists
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23235
        • Virginia Urology
    • Washington
      • Issaquah, Washington, United States, 98027
        • Athena Urology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women and men >18 years of age
  • A score of > 4 on the OAB-q short form for urgency (question 1)
  • Average urinary frequency > 10 times in one 24 hour day based on a 3-day voiding diary
  • Self-reported bladder symptoms present > 3 months
  • Self-reported failed conservative care (i.e., dietary restriction, fluid restriction, bladder training, behavioral modification, pelvic muscle training, biofeedback, etc.)
  • Off all antimuscarinics for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Capable of giving informed consent
  • Ambulatory and able to use a toilet independently, without difficulty
  • Capable and willing to follow all study-related procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant as confirmed by urine pregnancy test, or plans to become pregnant during the study period
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Botox use in bladder or pelvic floor muscles in the past year
  • Pacemakers or implantable defibrillators
  • Primary complaint of stress urinary incontinence
  • Current urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Current vaginal infection
  • Current use of InterStim
  • Current use of Bion
  • Current use of TENS in the pelvic region, back or legs
  • Previously been treated with PTNS
  • Use of investigational drug/device therapy within the past 4 weeks
  • Participating or have participated within the past 4 weeks in any clinical investigation involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function
  • Deemed unsuitable for enrollment in study by the investigators based on subjects' history or physical examination (including bleeding disorders or anticoagulant medications, and peripheral neuropathy)
  • Subjects with nerve damage that would impact either percutaneous tibial nerve or pelvic floor function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Urgent PC
The Urgent PC Neuromodulation System is a minimally invasive neuromodulation system designed to deliver retrograde access to the sacral nerve through percutaneous electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve. The method of treatment is referred to as Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS).
No Intervention: Sham / Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Global Response Assessment (GRA) for Overall Bladder Symptoms to Compare the Proportion of Subjects Reporting "Moderately" or "Markedly Improved" Responses on the GRA After 12 Interventions of Randomized Therapy, in an Intent to Treat Analysis.
Time Frame: 13 weeks
A responder was defined as reporting bladder symptoms as moderately or markedly improved on a 7-level GRA at week 13 after completing 12, 30-minute, consecutive weekly intervention sessions.
13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe