A Prospective Study Comparing Ranibizumab Plus Dexamethasone Combination Therapy Versus Ranibizumab Monotherapy for Wet AMD (Lucedex)

December 18, 2012 updated by: Subhransu K. Ray, M.D., Ph.D.

A Prospective Study Comparing Ranibizumab Plus Dexamethasone Combination Therapy Versus Ranibizumab Monotherapy for Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration

The primary objective of this proposed research study is to evaluate the safety of intravitreal ranibizumab in combination with intravitreal dexamethasone in comparison to intravitreal ranibizumab alone in the treatment of wet ARMD. The addition of the broad spectrum anti-inflammatory activity of dexamethasone may augment the anti-VEGF activity of ranibizumab by amelioration of inflammation existing in the microenvironment of the choroidal neovascularization. While the anti-VEGF agents have proven to be very efficacious in the treatment of exudative ARMD, their narrow target and window of activity may limit their overall durability of action.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective, single masked comparative trial using either combination therapy (group 1): same day combination therapy with 0.05cc intravitreal dexamethasone injection (10mg/ml vial) and a single 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab injection for four consecutive months will be compared to monotherapy (group 2): one intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab also given for four consecutive months. These treatments will then be followed by PRN treatment based on clinical exam, angiographic studies, and OCT evidence of residual subretinal fluid, CME, subretinal hemorrhage, or pigment epithelial detachment. Fluorescein angiography and fundus photography will be performed at baseline and at the 1, 3, 6, and 12 month follow-up visits. Only OCT testing will be performed at all follow-up visits. Both groups will be re-evaluated for safety at 12 and 24 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Bay Area Retina Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 4 meters using ETDRS Charts between 20/32 and 20/400 (Snellen Equivalent) in the study eye with evidence of neovascular ARMD.

(Only one eye will be eligible for study. If both eyes are eligible, the one with the better visual acuity will be selected for treatment unless, based on medical reasons, the investigator deems the other eye to be more appropriate for treatment and study.)

  • All lesion subtypes will be enrolled with the following criteria Predominantly and minimally classic: Angiographic lesion greater than 50% of the total lesion area Occult: Lesions must show recent activity progression with respect to vision, subretinal hemorrhage or subretinal fluid
  • Signed informed consent
  • Age greater than or equal to 50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment for ARMD in the study eye
  • Previous intravitreal drug delivery in the study eye
  • Previous vitrectomy in the study eye
  • Fibrosis or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye
  • Neovascular membrane from any other concurrent retinal disease such as high myopia (SER > -8D), histoplasmosis or other ocular inflammatory disease.
  • Known history of glaucoma and on more than one topical medication
  • History of glaucoma filtering surgery in the study eye
  • History of corneal transplant in the study eye
  • Patients with active co-existing macular disease such as diabetic macular edema
  • Active intraocular inflammation in the study eye
  • History of allergy to fluorescein not amenable to treatment
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or lactation
  • Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception. The following are considered effective means of contraception: surgical sterilization or use of oral contraceptives, barrier contraception with either a condom or diaphragm in conjunction with spermicidal gel, an IUD, or contraceptive hormone implant or patch.
  • Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated
  • Inability to comply with study or follow up procedures
  • Participation in another simultaneous medical investigation or trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combination Therapy
Combination therapy (group 1): same day combination therapy with 0.05cc dose intravitreal dexamethasone injection (10mg/ml vial) and a single 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab injection
Combination therapy (group 1): same day combination therapy with 0.05cc dose intravitreal dexamethasone injection (10mg/ml vial) and a single 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab injection
Active Comparator: Monotherapy
intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab
intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence and severity of ocular adverse events and visual acuity
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total number of treatments required
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Subhransu K Ray, M.D., Ph.D., Bay Area Retina Associates

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on ranibizumab and dexamethasone

Subscribe