Symptomatic Study Investigating Degarelix in Patients Suffering From Prostate Cancer

October 18, 2013 updated by: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

A Randomised, Parallel-arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Secondary to Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

The purpose of this trial was to see how well a new trial drug (degarelix) worked on lower urinary tract symptoms (also known as LUTS) in prostate cancer patients as compared to how a standard drug hormonal treatment worked on the same symptoms. The advancement/worsening of prostate cancer may be associated with LUTS and the symptoms may impact the ability to urinate normally and thereby the quality of life for these patients.

Patients were randomly selected (like flipping a coin) to receive either degarelix or standard hormone therapy (combination of goserelin and bicalutamide) for a 3 month treatment period. During this period the relief of urinary symptoms was evaluated via a questionnaire filled in by patients and addressing the severity and frequency of their symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bamberg, Germany, 96047
        • Facharztpraxis für Urologie
      • Borken, Germany, 46325
        • Gemeinschaftspraxis
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Universitätsklinikum Dresden
      • Fürth, Germany, 90763
        • Euromed Clinic
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22399
        • Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis
      • Köln, Germany, 50667
        • Gemeinschaftspraxis
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04109
        • VITURO Gesellschaft für Klinische Studien
      • Offenbach, Germany, 63069
        • Klinikum Offenbach GmbH
      • Planegg, Germany, 82152
        • Urologische Klinik Planegg
      • Wuppertal, Germany, 42103
        • Wuppertaler Gemeinschaftspraxis
      • Alcalá de Henares-Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
      • Alcorcon, Spain, 28922
        • Fundación Hospital Alcorcón
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Fundacion Puigvert
      • Bilbao (Bizkaia), Spain, 48013
        • Hospital de Basurto
      • Coruña, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario S. Carlos
      • Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 28222
        • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
      • Manacor, Spain, 07500
        • Hospital Manacor
      • Oviedo, Spain, 33006
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
        • Hospital Santiago De Compostela
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41014
        • Hospital Virgen Macarena
      • Vigo, Spain, 36204
        • Hospital Xeral de Vigo
      • Bristol, United Kingdom, BS2 8HW
        • United Bristol Healthcare NHSTrust Bristol Royal Infirmary
      • Falkirk, United Kingdom, FK1 5QE
        • Falkirk and District Royal Infirmary
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
        • Southern General Hospital
      • Hull, United Kingdom, HU16 5JQ
        • Castle Hill Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • King's College Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, E11 1NR
        • Whipps Cross University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
        • The Royal Free Hospital
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom, PL6 8DH
        • Derriford Hospital
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
        • Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield South
      • Sunderland, United Kingdom, SR4 7TP
        • Sunderland Royal Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has given written informed consent before any trial-related activity is performed
  • Has a confirmed prostate cancer in which this type of treatment is needed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment for prostate cancer
  • Previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate
  • Current use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitor or α-adrenoceptor antagonist.
  • Patients in need of external beam radiotherapy to be started at the same time as hormone therapy
  • Certain risk factors for abnormal heart rhythms/QT prolongation (corrected QT interval over 450 msec., Torsades de Pointes or use of certain medications with potential risk)
  • History of severe untreated asthma, anaphylactic reactions, or severe urticaria and/or angioedema.
  • Hypersensitivity towards any component of the investigational product
  • Other previous cancers within the last five years with the exception of prostate cancer and some types of skin cancer.
  • Clinical disorders other than prostate cancer including but not limited to renal, haematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, cardiac, neurological, psychiatric disease, alcohol or drug abuse or other conditionals as judged by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg
Degarelix 240 mg (40 mg/mL) + 80 mg (20 mg/mL)
The degarelix doses were administered into the abdominal wall every 28 days. A starting dose of 240 mg (40 mg/mL) degarelix was administered on Day 0 as two 3 mL subcutaneous (s.c.) injections. The second and third doses of 80 mg (20 mg/mL) degarelix were administered as single 4 mL s.c. injections on Days 28 and 56, respectively.
Other Names:
  • FE200486
Active Comparator: Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)
Goserelin implants (3.6 mg) were inserted s.c. into the abdominal wall every 28 days. The second and third doses of goserelin were administered on Days 31 and 59, respectively.
Other Names:
  • Zoladex
On Day 0, three days before the first dose of goserelin on Day 3, patients began once-daily per-oral (p.o.) treatment with bicalutamide (50 mg) as anti-androgen flare protection; this treatment continued for 14 days after the first dose of goserelin.
Other Names:
  • Casodex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
Time Frame: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.
After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value.
Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8
Time Frame: After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.
After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline
Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit
Time Frame: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the maximum urine flow (Qmax; mL/sec)
After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit
Time Frame: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the residual volume (Vresidual; mL)
After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12
Time Frame: After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline
TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate.
After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline
Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit
Time Frame: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit
Time Frame: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
Time Frame: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS questionnaire included an additional single question to assess the participant's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms. The question was: 'If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition the way it is now, how would you feel about that?' The possible answers to this question ranged from 'delighted' (a score of '0') to 'terrible' (a score of '6'). The figures in the tables present the change (ie decrease) in IPSS QoL score, i.e. the bigger the decrease the better QoL.
After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least on participant with one abnormal value are presented, many more variables were included in the trial.
Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Degarelix

3
Subscribe