Dihydroartemisinin (DHA)-Piperaquine for IPT to Prevent Malaria in Children in Burkina Faso

Randomized Trial of the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for Seasonal IPT to Prevent Malaria in Children Under 5 Years

The aim of the study is to determine whether piperaquine plus dihydroartemisinin (DHA-PQ) is as effective, and better tolerated, than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SP+AQ), when used for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) to prevent malaria in children aged 3 to 59 months in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso and to determine the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There is evidence from several studies that in areas where the transmission of malaria is seasonal, the use of IPT can reduce substantially the incidence of clinical malaria in children under the age of five years, by as much as 90% (Greenwood et al, Trends in Parasitology 24(11):485-6, 2008). The most effective regimen is SP+AQ but alternative regimens are needed because amodiaquine can be poorly tolerated (Sokhna et al PlosOne 3:e1471, 2008) and resistance to SP is increasing. In recent trials in Senegal and The Gambia, PQ combined with DHA or SP was as effective against malaria, and better tolerated, than SP+AQ. Of these regimens, only DHA+PQ is licensed for use as an antimalarial in African countries. However there are no data on pharmacokinetics of PQ when used for IPT in children, and the impact of DHA+PQ in preventing spread of resistance is not known. This trial aims to provide this information in order to evaluate the suitability of DHA+PQ for use for seasonal IPT in children and to determine the optimum dose regimen for piperaquine.

Malaria (caused primarily by Plasmodium falciparum) is endemic in the southern third of Burkina Faso, occurring seasonally between June to November, with most cases occurring between August and October. In Burkina Faso there has been no evidence of a recent decline in malaria incidence as seen in some other African countries. Although the policy is to treat uncomplicated malaria with artemisin combinations, in practice chloroquine remains the treatment used in most health facilities. Several studies have shown that seasonal IPT in children (IPTc) can provide a high degree of protection against clinical malaria. SP+AQ is the most effective regimen but amodiaquine is not well tolerated and resistance to SP is increasing n many areas. Alternative regimens are required. Piperaquine (PQ), a long acting antimalarial used for prophylaxis in China, is suitable for use for IPT. In studies in Senegal and The Gambia piperaquine plus SP or dihydroartemisinin (DHA) was as effective and better tolerated than SP+AQ. The purpose of this study is to determine whether DHA-PQ is more effective than SP+AQ in preventing spread of drug resistant parasite genotypes and to determine the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children who receive this drug for IPT. Little was known about the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine until recently, and there is currently only limited information about the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children. The pharmacokinetic data from this study will allow us to estimate the optimum dose regimen for piperaquine; the current recommended regimen for DHA-PQ is three doses over three days. For IPT, a single dose regimen is highly desirable as it would be easier to deliver and better accepted by communities.

1500 children aged 3 to 59 months will be enrolled and randomized to receive 3 monthly administrations of DHA-PQ or SP-AQ, in August, September and October. From August to November children will be visited twice weekly to check for malaria symptoms.

A subset of 45 children in each treatment group will be asked to provide a venous blood sample on days 0 and 7 for analysis of biochemical and haematological parameters.

In the DHA-PQ group only, a subset of 210 children will be asked to provide finger prick blood samples for PK analysis on day 0, between day 0 and day 6, on day 7, and between day 8 and day 30. To calibrate measurements of drug concentration in peripheral blood against existing PK models, each month 17 of these children will be asked to also provide a venous sample (up to 2ml taken into a vacutainer) on three occasions (one between day 0 and 6, one on day 7, and one between day 8 and 30). In addition, a separate group of 750 children aged 3 to 59 months will be recruited to be surveyed at the end of the transmission season to determine the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and of drug-resistance parasite genotypes in the study area.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1500

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed consent from a parent
  • age 3-59 months at enrolment
  • no history of allergy to study drugs
  • no chronic illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of allergy to study drugs
  • intention to move away from the study area before the end of 2009
  • any chronic illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DHA-PQ
Three monthly administrations of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus piperaquine (PQ) in August, September and October.

Three monthly administrations of Duocotexcin (DHA-PQ):

dihydroartemisinin 2.1mg/kg and piperaquine phosphate 16.8 mg/kg once daily for three days

Other Names:
  • Seasonal IPTc with Duocotexcin (Holley)
Active Comparator: SP-AQ
Three monthly administrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine

Three monthly administrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine:

One dose of Sulfadoxine 25mg/kg and pyrimethamine 1.25mg/kg Three daily doses of amodiaquine phosphate 10mg/kg

Other Names:
  • Seasonal IPTc with Fansidar plus amodiaquine (Flavoquine)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Efficacy against clinical malaria
Time Frame: August to December 2009
August to December 2009
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Within 7 days of each treatment round and within 1 month of treatment
Within 7 days of each treatment round and within 1 month of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics of piperaquie: the oral clearance (CL/F), AUC, steady state volume of distribution(s) (Vss/F), inter-compartment clearance(s) (Q/F) and absorption rate (ka) will be estimated.
Time Frame: during 30 days after start of treatment
during 30 days after start of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jean-Bosco Ouédraogo, MD, IRSS, Direction Régionale,BP 545 Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)
  • Study Chair: Paul JM Milligan, PhD, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Issaka Zongo, MD, IRSS, Burkina Faso and LSHTM, UK

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 21, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe