MEK Inhibitor MSC1936369B Plus FOLFIRI in Second Line K-Ras Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)

August 24, 2016 updated by: EMD Serono

A Double-blind, Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter, Exploratory, and Placebo-controlled Phase II Trial of FOLFIRI Plus MSC1936369B or Placebo With a Safety run-in Part as Second-line Treatment of Metastatic K Ras Mutated Colorectal Cancer Subjects

The research trial is testing the experimental treatment pimasertib (MSC1936369B) in combination with FOLFIRI, as second-line treatment in metastatic K Ras mutated colorectal cancer subjects. The study will be run in two parts:

Part 1, or Safety Run-in Part: Will determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pimasertib combined with FOLFIRI as second-line treatment in subjects with metastatic K Ras mutated colorectal cancer.

Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomised Part: Will assess the anti-tumor activity of pimasertib combined with FOLFIRI compared to FOLFIRI with placebo as second-line treatment in metastatic K Ras mutated colorectal cancer subjects.

Phase I which Is an open label dose escalation "3+3" cohort, non-randomized, safety Phase II which is a double blind randomized safety/efficacy

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Napoli, Italy
        • Research Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For Safety Run-in and Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomised Part

  • Histologically confirmed K-Ras mutated colon/rectum cancer
  • Subject's disease must have progressed during or after a first-line treatment for metastatic disease with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab
  • Evidence of metastatic measurable disease at trial entry as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Complete tumor assessment performed within 14 days prior to first trial drug administration
  • Male/female subjects aged greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years
  • Subject has read and understood the informed consent form
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative blood pregnancy test at the screening visit. Subjects and their partners must be willing to avoid pregnancy during the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

For Safety Run-in and Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomised Part

  • Bone marrow impairment
  • Renal impairment
  • Liver function and liver cell integrity abnormality
  • History of central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • History of difficulty of swallowing, malabsorption or other chronic gastrointestinal disease
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) greater than (>)1
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity, active hepatitis C, or active hepatitis B
  • Has received extensive prior radiotherapy on more than 30 percent (%) of bone marrow reserves, or prior bone marrow/stem cell transplantation
  • Has received chemotherapy, any investigational drug, or having participated in another clinical trial within the past 4 weeks prior to trial first drug administration
  • Has a history of any other significant medical disease
  • Past or current history (within the last 2 years prior to inclusion) of malignancies except for the indication under this study
  • Has significant cardiac conduction abnormalities and/or pacemaker
  • Is a pregnant or nursing female
  • Has retinal degenerative disease, history of uveitis, or history of retinal vein occlusion
  • Other significant disease that in the Investigator's opinion would exclude the subject from the trial
  • Known hypersensitivity to the trial treatment(s) or diluents (when applicable), including placebo or other comparator drug(s)
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Pimasertib+FOLFIRI
Subjects will be administered with pimasertib orally once daily on Days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of a 28 day cycle.
Other Names:
  • MSC1936369B
Subjects will be administered with FOLFIRI (laevoleucovorin 200 milligram per square meter [mg/m^2] intravenous [i.v] infusion over 90 minutes or leucovorin [dl-leucovorin] 400 mg/m^2 i.v. infusion over 90 minutes; followed by irinotecan 180 mg/m^2 given as a 90-minute infusion in 500 milliliter [mL] dextrose 5%; followed by a bolus 5-fluorouracil [FU] 400 mg/m^2 and a 46-hour infusion 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2) at conventional doses on days 1 and 15 of the same 28 day cycle.
Experimental: Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomized part: Pimasertib+FOLFIRI
Planned, not performed
Subjects will be administered with pimasertib orally once daily on Days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of a 28 day cycle.
Other Names:
  • MSC1936369B
Subjects will be administered with FOLFIRI (laevoleucovorin 200 milligram per square meter [mg/m^2] intravenous [i.v] infusion over 90 minutes or leucovorin [dl-leucovorin] 400 mg/m^2 i.v. infusion over 90 minutes; followed by irinotecan 180 mg/m^2 given as a 90-minute infusion in 500 milliliter [mL] dextrose 5%; followed by a bolus 5-fluorouracil [FU] 400 mg/m^2 and a 46-hour infusion 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2) at conventional doses on days 1 and 15 of the same 28 day cycle.
Experimental: Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomized part: Placebo+FOLFIRI
Planned, not performed
Subjects will be administered with FOLFIRI (laevoleucovorin 200 milligram per square meter [mg/m^2] intravenous [i.v] infusion over 90 minutes or leucovorin [dl-leucovorin] 400 mg/m^2 i.v. infusion over 90 minutes; followed by irinotecan 180 mg/m^2 given as a 90-minute infusion in 500 milliliter [mL] dextrose 5%; followed by a bolus 5-fluorouracil [FU] 400 mg/m^2 and a 46-hour infusion 5-FU 2400 mg/m^2) at conventional doses on days 1 and 15 of the same 28 day cycle.
Subjects will be administered with placebo orally once daily on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, and 22-26 of a 28 day cycle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 28 (Part 1)
MTD was defined as the dose level, at which the treatment-related dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in >1 of 3 subjects or in >1 of 6 subjects. DLT was defined using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Any Grade >=3 non-hematological toxicity except for Grade 4 asymptomatic increases in liver function tests (LFTs) reversible within 7 days in subjects with liver involvement, Grade 3 asymptomatic increases in LFTs reversible within 7 days in subjects without liver involvement, Grade 3 vomiting controlled with adequate and optimal therapy and prophylaxis, and Grade 3 diarrhea controlled with adequate and optimal anti-diarrhea therapy; any Grade 4 neutropenia lasing >5 days/ febrile neutropenia lasting >1 day; any Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 with bleeding; any treatment delay >2 weeks due to trial treatment-related adverse effects at any dose level and judged to be possibly or probably related to the trial treatment.
Baseline up to Day 28 (Part 1)
Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomised Part: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From randomization up to first documented disease progression maximum up to 2 years
PFS was defined as time (in months) from the date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression as reported and documented by the Investigator (i.e. radiological progression per RECIST v1.0) or death for any cause.
From randomization up to first documented disease progression maximum up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and TEAEs Leading to Death
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug administration
An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
From the first dose of study drug administration up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug administration
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Pimasertib, Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Pimasertib, Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Pimasertib, Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC0-t) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification.
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Pimasertib, Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
The AUC(0-inf) of pimasertib and irinotecan was estimated by determining the total area under the concentration time curve extrapolated to infinity.
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of Pimasertib, Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
The t1/2 was defined as the time required for the plasma concentration of pimasertib and irinotecan to decrease 50% in the final stage of elimination.
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/f) of Pimasertib, (CL) Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Clearance of a drug was a measure of the rate at which drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Apparent clearance after oral dose (CL/f) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Apparent Oral Volume of Distribution (Vz f) Pimasertib, (Vz) of Irinotecan and SN-38
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired serum concentration. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/f) was influenced by the fraction absorbed.
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Ratio of Cmax for Pimasertib (Day 1/Day 8), Irinotecan and SN-38 (Day 1/Day 15)
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan and SN-38
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Ratio of AUC0-inf of Pimasertib (Day 1/Day 8), Irinotecan and SN-38 (Day 1/Day 15)
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan
The AUC(0-inf) was estimated by determining the total area under the concentration time curve extrapolated to infinity.
Day 1 and Day 8 for pimasertib; Day 1 and Day 15 for Irinotecan
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Number of Subjects With Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
BOR was defined based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.0 (RECIST V1.0) as following: Complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions. Partial response (PR) was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of the targeted lesions. CR and PR had to be documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks (28 days). Stable disease (SD) was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as progressive disease (PD) being demonstrated during the first 4 weeks. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions compared to the smallest SLD since the study treatment started.
Up to 2 years
Part 1 or Safety Run-in Part: Circulating Biomarkers in Serum
Time Frame: Predose, Day 1, 2 and 16 of cycle 1 followed by Day 1 pre-dose of every second cycle up to 2 years
Predose, Day 1, 2 and 16 of cycle 1 followed by Day 1 pre-dose of every second cycle up to 2 years
Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomized Part: Circulating Biomarkers
Time Frame: Predose, Day 1, 2 and 16 of cycle 1 followed by Day 1 pre-dose of every second cycle up to 2 years
Predose, Day 1, 2 and 16 of cycle 1 followed by Day 1 pre-dose of every second cycle up to 2 years
Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomized Part: Best Overall Response
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
BOR was defined based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.0 (RECIST V1.0) as following: Complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions. Partial response (PR) was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of the targeted lesions. CR and PR had to be documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks (28 days). Stable disease (SD) was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as progressive disease (PD) being demonstrated during the first 4 weeks. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions compared to the smallest SLD since the study treatment started.
Up to 2 years
Part 2 or Phase 2 Randomized Part: Number of Subjects With TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and TEAEs Leading to Death
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug administration
An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAES between first dose of study drug administration and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
From the first dose of study drug administration up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Responsible, Merck Serono S.A., Geneva

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Pimasertib

3
Subscribe