Impact of Fluid Management Within a Goal-directed Hemodynamic Protocol on Acid-base Balance in Elective Trauma Surgery (HIPSTER)

November 15, 2011 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Impact of a Balanced Infusion Solution Compound of 50% Crystalloid and 50% Colloid Versus an Unbalanced Infusion Solution of 100% Crystalloid Within a Goal-directed Hemodynamic Protocol on Acid-base Balance

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the administration of a compound of balanced infusion solutions including 50% crystalloid and 50% colloid has a positive impact on acid-base balance in elective hip replacement surgery. The application of the study medication will be carried out through a goal-directed intraoperative therapy by transoesophageal doppler.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at the age of 60 and above who want to undergo an elective hip replacement surgery in the center of musculoskeletal surgery
  • Offered patient information and written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another trial according to the German Drug Law 30 days to and during the study
  • Lacking willingness to save and hand out data within the study
  • Accommodation in an institution due to an official or judicial order
  • (Unclear) history of alcohol or substances disabuse
  • Absent knowledge of german language
  • Analphabetism
  • Allergy to hydroxyethyl starch or other ingredients of the intravenous solutions
  • For women: Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test within the preoperative screening
  • Operation due to case of emergency, polytrauma or pathologic fracture
  • Only use of regional anaesthesia
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification greater than III
  • Peripheral or central edema
  • AIDS (according to the CDC-classification of HIV-infection: category C)
  • Rheumatoid disease under treatment with Anti-TNF-alpha-Ab and/or high-dose-corticoid-treatment
  • Immunosuppression therapy
  • History of bleeding tendency (e.g. von-Willebrand-disease, thrombocytopenia)
  • Derailed metabolic disorder (e.g. Diabetes mellitus (Glucose > 300 mg/dl) during the preoperative screening)
  • Known history of electrolyte disturbance (e.g. Hyperkalemia > 5.8 mmol/l, Hypernatraemia > 155 mmol/l)
  • Known history of acid-base-dysbalances
  • History of intracranial hemorrhage within one year of participation in the study
  • Neurological or psychiatric disease with limited contractual capability
  • Advanced disease of the oesophagus or upper respiratory tract
  • Operation in the area of the oesophagus or nasopharynx within the last two months
  • CHF (congestive heart failure) according to (New York Heart Association) classification - NYHA class IV
  • Liver disease (CHILD B or C cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease (MELD-score greater than 10))
  • Conditions after acute or chronic pancreatitis
  • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl or greater than 150 µmol/l or dependency of haemodialysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: unbalanced infusion solution
Based on changes of stroke volume measured by transoesophageal doppler patients during elective hip surgery will achieve either a unbalanced infusion solution, maximum dose of 100 ml/kg BW, or a compound of balanced infusion solution including 50% crystalloid and 50% colloid, each: maximum dose of 50 ml/kg BW. The study medication will be administered only during surgery.
Active Comparator: balanced infusion solution compound
Based on changes of stroke volume measured by transoesophageal doppler patients during elective hip surgery will achieve either a unbalanced infusion solution, maximum dose of 100 ml/kg BW, or a compound of balanced infusion solution including 50% crystalloid and 50% colloid, each: maximum dose of 50 ml/kg BW. The study medication will be administered only during surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standard Base Excess
Time Frame: up to 2 days
After administration of 2 litres of study medication. In recovery room. On general ward.
up to 2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SID (strong ion difference)
Time Frame: up to 2 days
Change of the SID (strong ion difference) according to the stewart-approach of evalutation acid-base-dysbalances
up to 2 days
Hemodynamic Stability
Time Frame: up to 6 days
Doses and duration of therapy with catecholamins, number and duration of hypotensive episodes
up to 6 days
Fluid Loss of Drainage
Time Frame: up to 6 days
The quantity of fluids per day losing by drainage during the first three days after surgery
up to 6 days
Discharge Criteria, Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 5 days up to hospital discharge
Time until fullfilling the hospital discharge criteria (measured by the postanesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS)), and length of hospital stay
5 days up to hospital discharge
Organ Function/Dysfunction
Time Frame: up to 6 days
(Cumulative) frequency of postoperative organ dysfunctions (cerebral, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal)
up to 6 days
Incidence of Infections
Time Frame: up to 5 days
Perioperative Incidence of infections (according to the Centers of Disease and Prevention (CDC))
up to 5 days
Pain
Time Frame: up to 6 days
Pain of the patient measured by NAS (Numeric analogue scale), VAS (Visual analogue scale), NRS (Numeric rating scale) and BPS (Behavioral pain scale)
up to 6 days
Incidence of Delirium
Time Frame: up to 6 days
Incidence of delirium measured accordingly by DSM IV (Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders criteria for delirium), Nu-DESC (Nursing delirium screening scale), DDS (Delirium detection score), CAM (Confusion assessment method), CAM-ICU (Confusion assessment method for the ICU), DRS (Delirium rating scale) and ICDSC (Intensive care delirium screening checklist).
up to 6 days
Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Deficit (POCD)
Time Frame: up to 90 days after surgery
Measurement of cognitive function by 5 tests out of CANTAB (Cambridge neuropsychological test automated battery) modeled by the ISPOCD1 study (International study of post-operative cognitive dysfunction), Stroop colour word test(SCWT) and verbal learning test(VLT)
up to 90 days after surgery
Mobilisation
Time Frame: up to 6 days
Duration and type of mobilisation
up to 6 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Spies, Prof., MD, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2011

Last Verified

November 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodynamic Instability

Clinical Trials on Infusion Therapy

Subscribe