Impact of an Infusion Therapy Nursing Expert Service on Length of Stay and Clinical Results of Venous Access Devices (ETI)

September 20, 2013 updated by: Lucia Garate Echenique, Basque Health Service

Impact of an Infusion Therapy Nursing Expert Service on Length of Stay, Clinical Results of Venous Access Devices and Satisfaction on Patients With Long Intravenous Therapy Prescription.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an infusion therapy nursing expert service is effective in decreasing hospital length of stay, improving the clinical results of venous access devices and increasing patient satisfaction with venous access.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Araba
      • Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain, 01009
        • Araba University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Require an estimated long prescription of intravenous treatment. These treatments may be of fluid therapy, pharmacological, nutritional or hemotherapy.

    • Estimation of 7 days or more of continuous intravenous therapy.
    • Estimation of an intermittent intravenous therapy of less than a week, but on a monthly basis or less and a total estimated duration superior to 3 months.
  • Be patient at Araba University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To have a central venous catheter indwelled
  • MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus)
  • Younger than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
routine care for the selection, placement and maintenance of venous access devices (VAD).
Experimental: Infusion Therapy Nursing Expert
Patients in this group will receive the infusion therapy nursing expert (ITNE) service.

The ITNE will assess the patient and treatment characteristics and use an evidence based decision making algorithm for the selection of the most suitable VAD.

If the VAD needed is a PICC or a midline ITNE will place it following hospital's protocols. If needed, ITNE will also educate and support patients and next of keens in the maintenance of the device at home.

If other devices such as peripheral catheters, central venous catheters (jugular or subclavian) or venous subcutaneous reservoirs are the preferable VADs for patients and treatment conditions, ITNE will work together with health professionals in charge of patients to activate the usual procedures to place the according device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Venous Access Devices reaching end of treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Incidence of complications derived from VAD
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Patients receiving intravenous therapy at home
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Patient satisfaction with VAD
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucia Garate, MsC, Basque Health Service

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients With Prolonged Intravenous Therapy

Clinical Trials on Infusion therapy nursing expert service

Subscribe